Should Fox News Parade Larry Sinclair Obama's gay lover because MSM Paraded Stormy Daniels????

0bama was sometimes fun, just as Eddy Murphy, but neither really had our interests at heart or even liked the whites. But you see this is going south, as the question was should we play tit for tat with this gay dude and these porn girls.

Short answer ........NO

originally posted by: Plotus
Short answer ........NO

YES! WTH?

Unless you think it's ok for those with power in government to arrest and imprison people in an effort to silence them.

What happened to Larry SInclair goes WAY beyond Stormy voluntarily signing an NDA.

Larry was retaliated against in violation of his Constitutional protections.

originally posted by: Plotus
Back to the OP's question, what good will it accomplish, 0bama was a jerk scoundrel and that is enough, wouldn't want to embarrass Larry Sinclair

Larry wanted the media to report his story -- hence his press conference where he was arrested.

Instead the media smeared him....but porn star (who sat on her allegations throughout the entire election and only came forward after she signed an NDA a week before the election and AFTER Trump was elected) is totes credible and worthy of media attention?

originally posted by: Plotus
0bama was sometimes fun, just as Eddy Murphy, but neither really had our interests at heart or even liked the whites. But you see this is going south, as the question was should we play tit for tat with this gay dude and these porn girls.

Yeah but it really goes to the heart of the issue. On this thread, there's a lot of hate for Obama. Sure he wasn't the greatest president. But as I've shown, Both Bushes, Nixon, Trump --none of them had our interests at heart. Carter and Ford were both inept, and Reagan and Clinton had huge misteps like Lewinski and Iran Contra.

originally posted by: mzinga
a reply to: amfirst1

Proof? Seriously how can threads like this exist?

HERE'S HOW:

Obama has had 10 years to deny Larry's allegations and he never has. So why should you doubt it? Were you with Obama during the weekend that Larry claims he was giving him BJs in a hotel room, in 1999? No? Then you have no reason to disbelieve Larry.

I'm inclined to believe Larry considering the severe retaliation he endured after telling his story to the media at the National Press Club, in the summer of 2008.

originally posted by: jtma508
I don't think it has ever been established that the Sinclair thing is real. But if it is, does the fact that someone fooled around with a person of the same sex make them gay? So when your girlfriend fooled around in college with her roommate does that make her gay? Is everything that black-and-white to you people?

if two chicks get busy, it's just hot. If two dudes get busy, they are gay. It's a glaring double standard, but it is what it is. No grey area at all. None.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: jtma508
I don't think it has ever been established that the Sinclair thing is real. But if it is, does the fact that someone fooled around with a person of the same sex make them gay? So when your girlfriend fooled around in college with her roommate does that make her gay? Is everything that black-and-white to you people?

if two chicks get busy, it's just hot. If two dudes get busy, they are gay. It's a glaring double standard, but it is what it is. No grey area at all. None.

Two bi-sexuals would be grey.

Parade all of his gay lovers...and Michelle's lesbian pals! And while they're at it, demonstrate how the Great Obama reinforced all George Bush's ugly policies, extended the wars in afghan and Iraq, tried to install the Moslem Brotherhood in Egypt, created ISIS to destabilize Iraq, and supported Iran while it vowed death to UA and death to Israel...Yes, the MSM should lay the Obama cards on the table...

originally posted by: Zoyd23
Parade all of his gay lovers...and Michelle's lesbian pals! And while they're at it, demonstrate how the Great Obama reinforced all George Bush's ugly policies, extended the wars in afghan and Iraq, tried to install the Moslem Brotherhood in Egypt, created ISIS to destabilize Iraq, and supported Iran while it vowed death to UA and death to Israel...Yes, the MSM should lay the Obama cards on the table...

I hadn't heard bout Michelle's lesbian lovers or how Obama Created ISIS or how he supported IRAN. Remember that Reagan created the Taliban to fight Russia when they invaded afgahnistan and they turned into Al Queda and now ISIS. He didn't create that. Also remember that Reagan suppported IRAN with the Iran contra deal...remember a guy named Oliver North.

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
No. They missed their chance.

Using homosexuality to smear someone is wrong. Its not an insult to call someone gay. If you believe it is...well....

Nor calling someone transsexual as we saw with Richard Simmons who tried to sue for being called that and the courts ruled it was not a insult or negative thing to say...

Sure. Why not? What is your next question?

Or course calling someone 'gay' as an insult was something we did in elementary school but should Fox do it? They have done worse. So yes, it'd be funny to see Fox have 24 hour coverage centering around Obama being gay.

Wouldn't be great for Fox news, but funny for everyone else.

Sure. Why not? What is your next question?

Or course calling someone 'gay' as an insult was something we did in elementary school but should Fox do it? They have done worse. So yes, it'd be funny to see Fox have 24 hour coverage centering around Obama being gay.

Wouldn't be great for Fox news, but funny for everyone else.

a reply to: amfirst1

Is Any of that what People Really Want to Hear ? ...............Answer - NO .

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: amfirst1

Short answer?

No.

Because policy is what we should be discussing.

Quoted for truth. The country is in the #ter and people are worried about who sleeps with who.

Hm. People were obviously so deprived of information about Larry's story that they seem to believe it's only about extramarital, consensual sex....or the *gay* part.

If it was JUST that, then I would agree it's not worth reporting. However, Larry's story really starts AFTER he made his allegations. The retaliation he faced is absolutely egregious. IMO, it's one of the biggest political scandals in modern U.S. history.

The media utterly FAILED the public in burying Larry's story and spending what little coverage they gave (only Politico and Slate, IIRC) to just smear the guy without reporting any of the details of his allegations. I believe that one of them just called them "naughty" allegations.

The media made up your minds for you.

They didn't even give you a chance to consider Larry's story. You probably shouldn't respect them for that.

It will never be too late to expose what happened to Larry. If people cared about their Constitutional protections, they would care about Larry's story.

originally posted by: Jay Electronica
You people are obsessed with Obama for all the wrong reasons.

They have to. They have nothing else.

originally posted by: carewemust
Is Sin Clair now seeking to invalidate his hush agreement with Obama?

Perhaps Obama's other gay lover who was shot dead on his doorstep might have tried to invalidate his hush agreement... but someone ensured he'd be hushed for good.

a reply to: moistywood


Michelle is post op most likely.

a reply to: amfirst1

I know I am thinking what most are probably thinking, but why the hell do we care who a President or ex-President sleeps with after the Bill Clinton Presidency? I thought we were past this stupidity.