It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 4

page: 207
162
<< 204  205  206    208  209  210 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 01:57 PM
link   
a reply to: eisegesis

My fave lol




posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 02:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: eisegesis
LOL


Bush/Putin = Brollusion
Trump/Putin = Collusion

Link

An honorary Skull and Bones member?

Those are hilarious!



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 02:10 PM
link   



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 02:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: pavil

originally posted by: tiredoflooking

originally posted by: MindBodySpiritComplex

unknown persons are using bitcoin’s blockchain to store and link to child abuse imagery, potentially putting the cryptocurrency in jeopardy.


Researchers from the RWTH Aachen University, Germany found that around 1,600 files were currently stored in bitcoin’s blockchain. Of the files least eight were of sexual content, including one thought to be an image of child abuse and two that contain 274 links to child abuse content, 142 of which link to dark web services.

“Our analysis shows that certain content, eg, illegal pornography, can render the mere possession of a blockchain illegal,” the researchers wrote. “Although court rulings do not yet exist, legislative texts from countries such as Germany, the UK, or the USA suggest that illegal content such as child abuse imagery can make the blockchain illegal to possess for all users.”


“Since all blockchain data is downloaded and persistently stored by users, they are liable for any objectionable content added to the blockchain by others. Consequently, it would be illegal to participate in a blockchain-based systems as soon as it contains illegal content,” the researchers wrote.


Child abuse imagery found within bitcoin's blockchain


This is really bad. Blockchain tech is such a needed positive thing but I guess this is the dark side of the issue, they cannot take down the bad stuff just like they cannot take down the good. This is an attempt to wreck it all I fear.


Good Lord. I guess it was just a matter of time for them to use Block chain for stuff like kiddie porn. Surprising that those files are in cryptocurrency.

Wonder what other Silk Road stuff is stashed in those chains.




I may have missed the thread, but is it bad guys using or is it being used to either frame folks as bad or to snare bad guys? Or is it a combination of all the above?



They seem to be embedded into the chain. You could own a cryptocurrency and not even realize you have CP on your flash drive.

Great huh?

Probably Banks and Investment firms planting it to mess with the new currency.



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 02:32 PM
link   
Here is my current take on the Texas bombs. It looks like the perpetrator(s) are targeting random people and use package notifications to trigger the bombs remotely. What if this is a ploy to push for more autonomous drones to deliver packages like Amazon? I also suspect a disgruntled package delivery employee that fears drones will replace all the people and lose their jobs in the process. Thoughts?



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 02:43 PM
link   
a reply to: thepixelpusher

did y'all see the Sarkozy news? $42M tied to Libya for funding his campaign in 2010....

nypost.com...



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 02:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: ModusPonus
a reply to: thepixelpusher

did y'all see the Sarkozy news? $42M tied to Libya for funding his campaign in 2010....

nypost.com...

And then he (plus other leaders) repaid it by having Ghadaffi killed. Sweet guy.



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 02:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: ModusPonus
a reply to: thepixelpusher

did y'all see the Sarkozy news? $42M tied to Libya for funding his campaign in 2010....

nypost.com...

And then he (plus other leaders) repaid it by having Ghadaffi killed. Sweet guy.


This revelation could lead right back to HRC. I guess she already regrets her stupid "we came,we saw and he died" comment. This could also tie in with the Red Cross money video.



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 02:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Skyfloating
Facebook loses over 36 Billion in Market Value

(2 Days ago...still losing)

Which explains why Suckerberg has been selling off so many shares.


Is it my imagination or does it look like the CA whistleblower is in reality a white hat? This seems to hurt all the major players/criminals except Trump.



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 02:58 PM
link   
More bad news for Obama. He could easily break the record of being outed as the most corrupt president of all time. My ability to read people never fails me. Obama used executive powers to benefit close friends' private investment firms: Book


President Obama used his executive powers to attack industries to lower the value of certain companies, allowing his friends in the private sector to swoop in and buy them up at reduced prices, according to Peter Schweizer’s new book Secret Empires: How Our Politicians Hide Corruption and Enrich Their Families and Friends.

The book, released Tuesday, said Obama and his administration would deem industries either destructive to the environment or exploitative for the financial and professional gain of his friends, including industries such as coal mining, offshore drilling, cash advance companies, and for-profit colleges.

The book highlighted Marty Nesbitt and Harreld Kirkpatrick III, both former basketball players and close friends of the Obamas, who launched their private equity investment firm Vistria in sync with Obama’s re-election in 2012.

Unlike other investment funds that avoid highly regulated industries, Vistria was specifically focused on the fields that Obama was busy regulating.

“A curious pattern began to emerge,” Schweizer said in his book. “Obama and his administration would attack industries with government power, which led to substantially lower valuations for these companies. Nesbitt and Vistria, or others close to Obama, could then acquire those assets for pennies on the dollar.”



The book said one of the most visible targets of this scheme was the for-profit higher education industry. Obama concluded in 2013 that for-profit schools such as University of Phoenix, ITT Technical Institute, and DeVry University victimized students.

“They’ve been preyed upon very badly by some of these for-profit institutions,” Obama said in 2013 about students who attended these schools. “Their credit is ruined, and the for-profit institution is making out like a bandit.”

The University of Phoenix was hit hard by Obama's action when he ordered the Federal Trade Commission, among other government agencies, to crack down on for-profit schools.

After being suspended in 2015 following an investigation by the FTC, Phoenix’s parent company, Apollo Education Group, was bought out by three companies in 2016, including Vistria, for nine times less than its value before the suspension.

Schweizer's book also said there were close links between Vistria and the Department of Education, and said some department officials later went to work for the investment firm.



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 03:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: ModusPonus
a reply to: thepixelpusher

did y'all see the Sarkozy news? $42M tied to Libya for funding his campaign in 2010....

nypost.com...

And then he (plus other leaders) repaid it by having Ghadaffi killed. Sweet guy.


Oh, that's right. It was France who led that charge with Obama leading from behind in our"not war" with Libya.



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 03:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Perfectenemy

originally posted by: Skyfloating
Facebook loses over 36 Billion in Market Value

(2 Days ago...still losing)

Which explains why Suckerberg has been selling off so many shares.


Is it my imagination or does it look like the CA whistleblower is in reality a white hat? This seems to hurt all the major players/criminals except Trump.

Over in another thread, all the usual players are trying to make this out to be a major scandal for Trump. But I don't see where he's supposed to have done anything wrong. Do they seriously think a major presidential candidate wouldn't use data analysis? It seems to me they're mostly just sore that Trump got access to Facebook's data, which I assume they think was supposed to be the Dems' secret weapon or something.

I suspect that the Mighty Zuck is selling shares because he's literally going into hiding. His liberal allies consider him a traitor.
edit on 20-3-2018 by AndyFromMichigan because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 03:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: ModusPonus
a reply to: thepixelpusher

did y'all see the Sarkozy news? $42M tied to Libya for funding his campaign in 2010....

nypost.com...

And then he (plus other leaders) repaid it by having Ghadaffi killed. Sweet guy.


Oh, that's right. It was France who led that charge with Obama leading from behind in our"not war" with Libya.

And Hillary proudly cackling the news of victory.



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 03:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Perfectenemy

That's just blatant corruption.


I never thought much about U of Pheonix or ITT, but I did wonder what motivated the Feds to shut them down. Combine this with Uranium 1, and that business venture that Biden & Kerry's kids started. We definitely have a pattern of official decisions being made with the explicit purpose of enriching White House friends & family. Ironic that they're accusing Trump of this, when so far he's lost money being president!
edit on 20-3-2018 by AndyFromMichigan because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 03:14 PM
link   
I guess it's now safe to assume dead cat bounce is the plunging Facebook stock. Good i hate that smug sob who stole the idea for FB in the first place. I'm so glad i never trusted FB and thus didn't make an account. My mistrust of those companies saved me numerous times. Suck it Zuck.



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 03:17 PM
link   
What's up with the flags acting up again? It showed 164 hours ago and now they are back to 158.



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 03:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
I guess it's now safe to assume dead cat bounce is the plunging Facebook stock. Good i hate that smug sob who stole the idea for FB in the first place. I'm so glad i never trusted FB and thus didn't make an account. My mistrust of those companies saved me numerous times. Suck it Zuck.

I have a very minimal Facebook page that I haven't bothered updating (or looking at) in years. I won't care a bit if it disappears.

Edit: I found an article on Breitbart which really makes sense of this Facebook/Cambridge brouhaha.
Read it here.

As I figured, this is basically the libs getting upset at the thought that Facebook somehow helped Trump get elected. CA is, at worst, guilty of not deleting some FB user data they got in 2014. They insist they did delete it, and didn't use FB data to help Trump's campaign. Even if they did, they didn't hack or steal the data, and it would have been of little use to them.

It's fun watching the Resistance turn on its own.

edit on 20-3-2018 by AndyFromMichigan because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 03:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
I guess it's now safe to assume dead cat bounce is the plunging Facebook stock. Good i hate that smug sob who stole the idea for FB in the first place. I'm so glad i never trusted FB and thus didn't make an account. My mistrust of those companies saved me numerous times. Suck it Zuck.

I have a very minimal Facebook page that I haven't bothered updating (or looking at) in years. I won't care a bit if it disappears.


I expected people on the streets when it became clear that Facebook saves every inappropriate pic on their home servers for potential blackmail but crickets. I have no idea why people chose to ignore this blatant privacy violation. It feels like that we are surrounded by zombies who lost the ability to think for themselves. Did i dodge all the brainwashing BS by not participating and getting sucked in by all the social media companies? Sometimes i'm sure of it. This behavior is just beyond strange.



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 03:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
I guess it's now safe to assume dead cat bounce is the plunging Facebook stock. Good i hate that smug sob who stole the idea for FB in the first place. I'm so glad i never trusted FB and thus didn't make an account. My mistrust of those companies saved me numerous times. Suck it Zuck.

I have a very minimal Facebook page that I haven't bothered updating (or looking at) in years. I won't care a bit if it disappears.


Never had one...never will.
I've never seen FB cause anything but stress and fights between family and friends.

Garbage.



posted on Mar, 20 2018 @ 03:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Perfectenemy

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: ModusPonus
a reply to: thepixelpusher

did y'all see the Sarkozy news? $42M tied to Libya for funding his campaign in 2010....

nypost.com...

And then he (plus other leaders) repaid it by having Ghadaffi killed. Sweet guy.


This revelation could lead right back to HRC. I guess she already regrets her stupid "we came,we saw and he died" comment. This could also tie in with the Red Cross money video.

Quick breakdown on Libya/Ghadafi

Let's not forget that he was switching to currency(Dinar)backed by GOLD and knew of his soon demise. I always wondered where did the money/gold go? The same is asked about Saddam and his money/gold

He was killed because of wanting to drop the dollar for an African gold based currency the Dinar. The mainstream news called him "mad dog", they lie as you know!
Did you know Gadhafi’s Gold-money Plan Would Have Devastated Dollar?

It remains unclear exactly why or how the Gadhafi regime went from “a model” and an “important ally” to the next target for regime change in a period of just a few years. But after claims of “genocide” as the justification for NATO intervention were disputed by experts, several other theories have been floated. Oil, of course, has been mentioned frequently — Libya is Africa‘s largest oil producer. But one possible reason in particular for Gadhafi’s fall from grace has gained significant traction among analysts and segments of the non-Western media: central banking and the global monetary system.

According to more than a few observers, Gadhafi’s plan to quit selling Libyan oil in U.S. dollars — demanding payment instead in gold-backed “dinars” (a single African currency made from gold) — was the real cause. The regime, sitting on massive amounts of gold, estimated at close to 150 tons, was also pushing other African and Middle Eastern governments to follow suit.



edit on 20-3-2018 by LurkNoMore because: Can't stop won't stop



new topics

top topics



 
162
<< 204  205  206    208  209  210 >>

log in

join