It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 0bserver1
a reply to: ArMaP
A camera has multiple shot options, one of them is spot focus/focus spot/spot metering. Meaning its concentrated on the center field, not the surrounding fields and everything on the outside and that's closer to the the camera will be blurred
originally posted by: 0bserver1
a reply to: OrionHunterX
click to enlarge
Besides from reflection or something else, it seems as if the whole ISS is cut and pasted into the scene here, I've brightened the contrast and the straight pixeled lines do not match the rest of the image.
a straightly lined lasso tool is being used for cutting the ISS into the original picture..
the green marker shows how it supposed to be, and the red marker shows cut and pasting to straight pixel lines..
it's a pretty safe assumption it would be exposed to the same bright sunlight as the ISS
long-wave infrared spectra. IR Lenses are optical lenses that use specific substrates or anti-reflection coatings to maximize performance for applications operating above 700nm including thermal imaging
originally posted by: 0bserver1
I believe they used IR spectra lenses, IMO that means they also capture things that aren't seen by normal vision. And as we know IR shows green on the actual photograph
Now the question arises why, why using advanced optical equipment if you just want to snap something you didn't want the public to know about let alone putting them online?
originally posted by: Outlier13
a reply to: skunkape23
lol...do you mean the original machine that had a base plate of prefabulated aluminite, surmounted by a malleable logarithmic casing in such a way that the two main spurving bearings were in a direct line with the pentametric fan? The latter consisted simply of six hydrocoptic marzlevanes, so fitted to the ambifacient lunar waneshaft that side fumbling was effectively prevented. The main winding was of the normal lotus-o-delta type placed in panendermic semi-bovoid slots in the stator, every seventh conductor being connected by a nonreversible tremie pipe to the differential girdlespring on the "up" end of the grammeters.
What "advanced optical equipment"? We don't know the characteristics of the camera.
originally posted by: 0bserver1
a reply to: ArMaP
What "advanced optical equipment"? We don't know the characteristics of the camera.
True , so we can only presume that because in space they needed camera's that were IR sensitive to capture more of the whole spectrum of what could be in space other than what was visible on normal camera's.
a reply to: wmd_2008
I think just what ArMaP said we actually don't know what they used so we can speculate all week long what they used or not .
I seem to have a different opinion as you both have and that I can live with . What I see in those pictures deviates from many here , it's not the first time I see those same objects near earth spacecraft and therefore made my own conclusions about those photographs.
a reply to: antar
That we have to make our own conclusions, those with or without us..
The Nikon NASA F4 Electronic Still Camera was one of the first and rarest fully digital cameras with development started in 1987. While Nikon delivered a modified Nikon F4 body, most of the electronics for the digital camera and housings were designed and built by NASA at the Johnson Space Center and other suppliers. It was first flown in September 1991 on board the Space Shuttle Discovery, mission STS-48. Later the cameras were flown on several other Shuttle missions[4] including STS-44, 45, 42, 49, 53, 56 and 61.
All sensors used in digital cameras are (to some extent) sensitive to infrared light. This is simple to verify. Standard remote controls uses infrared light to signal the device. Take a TV or DVD remote control, point the remote at your digital camera and push one of the buttons. No visible light can be seen, but if you look at the preview or review of the remote on your camera's LCD screen, you should see the infrared light emitted by the device as a bright spot.
IR-light may cause image defects such as flare, false colours, hot spots and chromatic aberrations. It is not a good thing (in an ordinary photograh) to have the image affected by IR-light. As a measure against these defects, an IR-blocking filter in usually placed in the front of the camera's sensor.
originally posted by: 0bserver1
True , so we can only presume that because in space they needed camera's that were IR sensitive to capture more of the whole spectrum of what could be in space other than what was visible on normal camera's.
originally posted by: ArMaP
originally posted by: 0bserver1
True , so we can only presume that because in space they needed camera's that were IR sensitive to capture more of the whole spectrum of what could be in space other than what was visible on normal camera's.
If they wanted to use a special camera to get images with more information than what a normal camera shows why use the camera behind a glass? That would limit the camera to the characteristics of the glass, if the glass acts as a IR filter, for example, they wouldn't get any IR with their "special camera".
originally posted by: 0bserver1
a reply to: ArMaP
NASA
Yeah, you're probably right.
a reply to: Chadwickus
Thanks, mate for them links, I shouldn't look deep into these photographs, you never know who's reflection shows up?
peekaboo