It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Hopefully this will be his chance to stick it to Trump since Bannon is delusional enough to think he can run for president.
What Cult45 should really be worried about is the fact that Bannon chose the same lawyer as Rinsedpubis & the dirty lawyer whose jammed up in the White House.
Rinsed is cooperating & is said to have kept "copious" notes on his time in the administration.
Considering what kind of lowlife Bannon is you don't consider the fact that he has a payback portfolio?
I just want the scum and corrupt out of Washington.
originally posted by: aethertek
a reply to: Middleoftheroad
I just want the scum and corrupt out of Washington.
Then you shouldn't have voted for Trump.
Even before he ran for president it was widely known that Trump was a scumbag, so call me immature all you want, that doesn't absolve you from your ignorant decision.
You chose to support a corrupt carnival barker for the Presidency of the United States.
Why?
Did he "speak" for you?
K~
originally posted by: olaru12
www.thedailybeast.com...
uh oh....
It's most likely just a nothingburger
But there's always the chance that you're correct, but in my experience in the legal system, if, after seven months and hundreds of interviews and thousands of other forms of data and information at your disposal, you have nothing that even slightly indicates the focus of the investigation has done anything illegal, either you're inept at conducting an investigation (and I don't think that Mueller is inept) or there's most likely nothing to the claimed wrongdoings.
I'm assuming Cult45 includes myself since I voted for Trump. Which is cool, you can label us all you want, but just know you're immaturity is showing.
And how long do you think it should take to investigate a president?
originally posted by: Eshel
a reply to: Middleoftheroad
I had to stop here.
I'm assuming Cult45 includes myself since I voted for Trump. Which is cool, you can label us all you want, but just know you're immaturity is showing.
Wanna get into "name calling"?
Here's a couple names I want to run by your "immaturity" checklist.
Snowflake & Libtard
Get back to me on those and I'll find more for you.
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: olaru12
... in my experience in the legal system, if, after seven months and hundreds of interviews and thousands of other forms of data and information at your disposal, you have nothing that even slightly indicates the focus of the investigation has done anything illegal, either you're inept at conducting an investigation (and I don't think that Mueller is inept) or there's most likely nothing to the claimed wrongdoings.
In fact, there's more evidence that shows that this investigation is founded on shady, possibly illegal actions and documents than there is that shows Trump doing anything illegal with the Russians.
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: olaru12
But in any event, waiting is the name of the game, as we could play the speculation game all day every day and get only get nowhere fast.