It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Who Dare Say Our China Be Able To Copy Only ?

page: 6
0
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 18 2005 @ 03:37 AM
link   
China are certainly a long way off from innovating something better than the United States - its alot easier to play catch up - they maybe good at contructing tried and tested airframe designs but are 10's of years off the level of creativity, innovation and expertise that the americans have.

The J-10 looks a very basic air craft by modern standards - more worrying would be the capabilities of the internal avionics that are probably surpassed by F-15's. Its more about the internal package of aircraft these days and BVR capabilities.




posted on Apr, 18 2005 @ 10:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by Vanguard
- more worrying would be the capabilities of the internal avionics that are probably surpassed by F-15's. Its more about the internal package of aircraft these days and BVR capabilities.


ARe you certain of that??..


SOC

posted on May, 7 2005 @ 11:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by emile
I got two pics to show the next generation of Chinese fighter.
external image


That one look an awful lot like the Mikoyan 1.44 technology demonstrator to me.



posted on May, 8 2005 @ 07:23 AM
link   
It looks like it, but its quite different. And no, it is basically just a rendered picture of the twin engined J-10.



posted on May, 8 2005 @ 09:05 AM
link   
hey folks,
why copy the Lavi?? its ancient technology.Even the Isreali Airfoce dosnt use the aircraft.



posted on May, 11 2005 @ 02:20 PM
link   
Hmmm. Maybe that's why China just place huge order with Boeing for airliners. They must have decided the Russian ones they have been using weren't worth copying.



posted on May, 19 2005 @ 08:37 AM
link   
These type topic threads will no longer be allowed.
They are distracting and disruptive, and only fuel further division between members [namely the Chinese and Indian members], providing nothing of substance to discussion, the ATS community, and ATS itself.

This matter and issue has been under ongoing observation and is now going to cease.

From here on out, bear in mind this:
READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!

Thread Closed




seekerof



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join