It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SR1TX
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Did Trump just do something I kind of support????
Yeah.
We need to set up a base on the Moon. From there, we could more easily launch manned trips to Mars.
From Mars, we could take trips further out, maybe some of the moons of Jupiter or Saturn.
If we hadn't stopped in the 1970's.... we could already have people on Mars.
That was all a ruse. They needed a shuttle to build a space station to better spy on the world and capture and bring back 'enemy' satellite tech.
What you think the cargo bays are for, one way deliveries? I would show you the inside of one upon return...
but thats classified
A shuttle is not going to intercept a satellite and then bring it back down with it.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Did Trump just do something I kind of support????
originally posted by: Trueman
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk
I find no justification for not having a base in the moon after all these years of space exploration. I'm not asking something too big, maybe and remote controlled observatory. There has to be an intentional delay. I'd say Moon first, then Mars.
originally posted by: Revolution9
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Revolution9
It's not nostalgic at all. It might prove to be necessary to get further away. And kind of cool too. How long will this take?
Knowing Trump it is. Of course for Science it is great news with lots of new cash to spend.
No other President has had any interest. Yes, I repeat, with Trump is it is a sense of nostalgia and pride, you better, you better, you bet. Do ya like him now?
originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti
originally posted by: Revolution9
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Revolution9
It's not nostalgic at all. It might prove to be necessary to get further away. And kind of cool too. How long will this take?
Knowing Trump it is. Of course for Science it is great news with lots of new cash to spend.
No other President has had any interest. Yes, I repeat, with Trump is it is a sense of nostalgia and pride, you better, you better, you bet. Do ya like him now?
Well, there was one president that had interest. John Kennedy once said, the United States will put a man on the moon before the end of the decade. That was in the early sixties. We got to the moon in '69.
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: intrptr
What do you think they retrieve up there? Genuine question.
OPFOR technology.
originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: intrptr
What do you think they retrieve up there? Genuine question.
OPFOR technology.
Okay, I just googled that and Google started listening...
I guess you're onto something there bud.
originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
a reply to: intrptr
Apart from in this report
ntrs.nasa.gov...
originally posted by: Trueman
a reply to: Revolution9
I feel like he's been reading ATS.
originally posted by: Trueman
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk
I find no justification for not having a base in the moon after all these years of space exploration. I'm not asking something too big, maybe and remote controlled observatory. There has to be an intentional delay. I'd say Moon first, then Mars.
www.abovetopsecret.com...