It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Well and I think with an outfit like this, the dirt is a commodity, not necessarily something that they need to be commissioned to do. In this case, like a private intelligence operation.
* Who actually initiated the Russian aspects of the investigation. Was it the DNC, Clinton campaign, Mark Elias, Glenn Simpson?
* Did anyone from outside Fusion GPS sign off on hiring Steele?
* Were the memorandums from Steele (he said he sent 16 separate documents) shared with the Mark Elias (Perkins Coie), DNC, the Clinton campaign, etc.
According to Steele, starting in July, he sent information to an FBI contact himself.
originally posted by: pavil
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: mOjOm
I kind of admire Fusion GPS. Banking off of both sides.
Yes, high standards of integrity and morals to be Sure. Totally trustworthy.
originally posted by: sooth
The best thing about Trump is that, like all the players on both sides, he is rotten to the core human garbage - but he wears it proudly and doesn't try to hide it. And the more he is out there unabashedly flaunting it the more his enemies try to use to destroy him, but are instead taking the polish off their own draconian dealings and exposing themselves for the wicked fiends they all are.
I'm not convinced Trump is doing this on purpose, but it is still bloody brilliant.
As far as intel gathering, well now it was the dems that started this fiasco.
They were very explicit with the Don Jr story, accepting dirt from the russians was collusion, possibly even treason. The difference is Don apparently received no dirt, and he did not solicit or pay for it.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
I always wonder about the OP’s true intent. He failed to say that the Free Becon gave it all up long before the dossier and the hiring of a former spy.
That was all on Hillary and the DNC, in the case with Trump the Free Becon is moot,and even demonstrates they couldn’t find anything and so it all had to be created out of thin air.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Grambler
Right. So let's move to that too because I have a question there as well.
Once they had the dosser from Steele, even if they didn't know if all of it was correct or not, if they did believe certain parts were correct in it and those parts would justify warrants, wouldn't that still be grounds to get them???
Especially if those parts mentioned Manafort or Flynn who actually do raise red flags and we know why. So wouldn't that still be grounds for warrants.
I disagree with them leaking anything they didn't believe to be valid as a way to slander Trump, but aside from that it seems there may be some valid reasons for warrants too.
So why would it then be illegal for Hilary to pick up where they left off again???
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Grambler
Ok. My question is was it illegal to hire Steele though??
Also, I'm still not sure I get why Intel Gathering with a Government Agent is collusion. That would mean every agent who's gathering Intel from other enemy Nations would be considered Collusion too.
I do not believe it would be illegal to hire steele, though I could be wrong.
Regardless, I dont think it is that big of a deal.
As far as intel gathering, well now it was the dems that started this fiasco.
They were very explicit with the Don Jr story, accepting dirt from the russians was collusion, possibly even treason. The difference is Don apparently received no dirt, and he did not solicit or pay for it.
As I said before, I do not think the first three points I made are near as significant as points 4 and 5.
It makes the dems look like hacks to scream about russian collusion while engaging in the same thing, and to lie about it. And it allowed Russia to interfere in our country in a huge way.
But the real scandal is if the russian sourced dossier that was paid for by dems was then used by the Obama admin in part to get fisa warrants to spy on his opponents (which although there are reports of this from CNN and elsewhere they are anonymously sourced so its not confirmed). And the FBI's unwillingness to cooperate with subpoenas to answer this, and possibly paying Steele themselves.
It wasnt that it was Russian individuals or Russian sources that was the problem. It was working directly with the Russian government that was the problem. One you seem so keen on ignoring to push your DNC/Russian collusion deflection.
Talking Points Brought to Trump Tower Meeting Were Shared With Kremlin
Oh look that lawyer you tried to say was a DNC operative was sharing things with the Kremlin!
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: JinMI
Having dirt on someone, especially in American Politics is like having keys to treasure room. Think about it. When you see campaign ads here in America or keep up with politics, what is the primary message coming to, positive or negative???
Other than Sanders who doesn't run those kinds of ads. Almost every ad coming out is always talking sh*t about it's opponent. Way more of the negative attacks then anything positive about what their choice is going to do.
Then there's the potential leaks like you said.
So hell ya, having some dirt is valuable big time. As long as it's credible anyway. You get caught slinging fake dirt and you'll find it will backfire sometimes. But not always. Sometimes it just takes an accusation and that will ruin someone.