It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Nope, what you see in that animation comes from fact that moon's orbit isn't exact sphere but an ellipse, there's small changes in orbital speed depending on its position and that makes it look like it's wobbling.
Originally posted by Whiskey Jack
I think that, at least, it's pretty safe to say that the side of the moon facing us is convex.
Originally posted by E_T
First of all if we are exact gravity is manifestation of bending of spacetime caused by masses.
Nope, what you see in that animation comes from fact that moon's orbit isn't exact sphere but an ellipse, there's small changes in orbital speed depending on its position and that makes it look like it's wobbling.
"Religion is the masterpiece of the art of animal training, for it trains people as to how they shall think."
Originally posted by Plumbo
There's a saying in the old testament that cursed is the man who trusts in man, and blessed is the man who trusts in God.
Wrong... you're theories are no different than those of flat/hollow earthers so don't try to make it look like I would be supporting you!
Well, we got a defector from the sphere gang at least!
Originally posted by E_T
Locking of moon's rotation period to its orbital period is called tidal locking and there are also other examples of it in solar system.
Glass like surface of some meteorites comes from heat which melts surface, in many of those you can even see flowing signs of melted rock.
"Religion is the masterpiece of the art of animal training, for it trains people as to how they shall think."
-Arthur Shopenhauer
"Religion is what the common people see as true, the wise people see as false, and the rulers see as useful."
-Seneca
"I have recently been examining all the known superstitions of the world, and do not find in our particular superstition (Christianity) one redeeming feature. They are all alike founded on fables and mythology."
-Thomas Jefferson
"To surrender to ignorance and call it God has always been premature, and it remains premature today."
-Isaac Asimov
"Faith in a holy cause is to a considerable extent a substitute for lost faith in ourselves."
-Eric Hoffer
Well, we got a defector from the sphere gang at least!
Wrong... you're theories are no different than those of flat/hollow earthers so don't try to make it look like I would be supporting you!
Your theory about shape of moon is plainly based to wrong assumptions about its orbit.
And funny how you first downplay Newton's gravity (being pretty close to gravity in relativity) as old and then hug one of the Kepler's laws which is as old.
If you have forgotten basic things, "density" of radiation is proportional to angle in which it hits surface, with smaller hitting angle same amount of radiation is distributed to bigger surface area.
Originally posted by Plumbo
The glass causes the opposite effect in scale and temperature...
Let me explain, at dusk and dawn, we feel the coolness of the day, say, on a hot summer day, and yet, the sun looks HUGE, on the other hand, when we feel the intense heat in mid afternoon, the sun looks it's tiniest-
Wrong. Photos for this kind of comparison are taken so that object is equally high above horizon in all of them. (or above certain angle so that effect of atmosphere negligible)
It is merely the area of the concave moon falling under the bulging illusion created by the glass lens as the moon travels across the sky revealing different areas of the concave surface.
Originally posted by E_T
Equator bulge of earth is caused by combined effect of gravity (in these cases Newton's gravity is enough) and rotation.
Force of gravity is inversely proportional to distance from center of mass so it's equal in every place of earth surface, this is the force which tries to keep earth as sphere.
Now rotation causes "centrifugal force" which tries to break up earth and whose strength depends on only (because rotation time of solid object doesn't vary in different parts of it) from distance to rotation axis with force being directly proportional to it so force is strongest in place farthest away from rotation axis, on equator.
Now when these two forces are combined it leads to little weaker "gravity" on equator leading to squashing of earth/bulging of equator.
Originally posted by Plumbo
The glass causes the opposite effect in scale and temperature...
Let me explain, at dusk and dawn, we feel the coolness of the day, say, on a hot summer day, and yet, the sun looks HUGE, on the other hand, when we feel the intense heat in mid afternoon, the sun looks it's tiniest-
If you have forgotten basic things, "density" of radiation is proportional to angle in which it hits surface, with smaller hitting angle same amount of radiation is distributed to bigger surface area.
Also with sun lower in the sky radiation have to go through thicker atmosphere meaning more radiation is filtered by atmosphere.
That's also behind seasons, angle of sun in the sky at same time of day changes when earth orbits around sun. (because rotation axis is tilted compared to level of orbit)
It is merely the area of the concave moon falling under the bulging illusion created by the glass lens as the moon travels across the sky revealing different areas of the concave surface.
Wrong. Photos for this kind of comparison are taken so that object is equally high above horizon in all of them. (or above certain angle so that effect of atmosphere negligible)
t importantly you're ignoring very big hole in your moon theory, movement of terminator (edge between light and shadow) on moon's surface. If moon would be different shaped than sphere (/close to it) movement of terminator would be entirely different.
Radiowaves are EM radiation like visible light, so same "thickening" of atmosphere at low angles affects to them.
Originally posted by Plumbo
Tell me E_T, why are radio transmission signals nearly doubled in strength while the moon is directly overhead? Couldn't it be that the moon is a massive satellite dish reflecting the signal back to us?
Originally posted by Plumbo
Now if you could only define gravity for me...
Originally posted by Plumbo
Can not you see pretty colors in the sky?
Pretty colors come from glass.
Originally posted by Plumbo
No, your just a NASA puppet, you have no brain, no feelings, no common sense. Your heart is filthy, covered with darkness and hatred of God. Repent you disgusting sinner.
Originally posted by ThunderCloud
You've had gravity defined for you already. It's one of the five fundamental forces in the universe. And these fundamental forces are to Physics what postulates are to Math. So, what's your definition of gravity?
You're claiming that Einstein, Newton, et. al. are idiots, while you're the genius. Virtually all the science and math that humanity knows is evidence that these two, and their peers, are correct. And they weren't correct because people just decided to "believe" them -- there is more evidence than any one person could collect in a lifetime proving their discoveries true.
A basic Calculus course, and the application of derivatives and integrals to Newton's equations, will show that gravity will collect matter in spheres (like planets) and disks (like our solar system, our entire galaxy) when conditions are ideal.
Not only that, but Newton's equations are a special case of Einstein's equations -- Einstein's equations work on a cosmic scale, and when scaled down they simplify into Newton's equations, which works on the scale that humanity is accustomed to living.
Wrong. Pretty colors come from light, at different wavelengths. That's like saying, "Toasters create bread from thin air! I know because I saw a toaster produce a piece of bread from its innards once!"
Huh?
Science isn't a religion -- scientists don't decide something is "true" because that's what everyone voted on, or what those in charge decided was the "right" thing to believe. You're treating science as if it were a religion, and that's like calling bald a color of hair.
So, you think that the Moon and Sun are bowls, and that the Earth's atmosphere is covered in glass. Despite the fact that all the presented evidence (not beliefs, but evidence) absolutely disproves it, you cling to your beliefs.
Posters like E_T and myself aren't puppets of anyone; NASA showed us the evidence, and we decided for ourselves. All you have offered are personal beliefs and a few graphics to look at.
Hey, I don't want you to think I'm bashing you or anything -- your avatar and the graphics alone tell me you're an impressive artist. (I couldn't be an artist if I spent my whole life trying.) But, you've got a long way to go before you reach the level of knowledge to make the kind of judgements in Math & Science you're aiming for. But I can tell you're interested, so can I make a suggestion? Take Calculus, Physics I (Mechanics), Physics II (Electromagnetics), and an Astronomy course at your local college. I think you'll be impressed with the evidence once you've seen it all in its algebraic glory.
Originally posted by E_T
Radiowaves are EM radiation like visible light, so same "thickening" of atmosphere at low angles affects to them.
Also at radio frequencies atmosphere (or certain parts of it) work like semi tranparent boundary (like air-water boundary with visible light) so that when hitting angle decreases over certain point, reflectivity of boundary increases "exponentially".
Explained already, with lower hitting angle amount of radiation per surface area is smaller.
Originally posted by PlumboHow far away is the sun? If it is 93,000,000 miles away, then why such a wide temperature difference at the poles as compared to the equator? What's a couple thousand miles? Why are shadows of clouds, viewed from above the atmosphere, at varying heading angles, they're not parallel. Why, if the earth is traveling through frigid space, does it not freeze up like a ice cube in a freezer? How could the core keep perpetually giving off heat?
I'm afraid that's just pretty much impossible, especially with someone "who has permission from god"... like religious leaders of world politics prove.
Originally posted by Banshee
How about we act like adults and stop with the rudeness, mmkay?
Blind belief to something without proofs doesn't qualify as understanding.
But, I have understanding. I understand how things work
These are the people I am looking for.....
With its large body and internal heating from radioactive elements, a planet behaves like a fluid, and over long periods of time succumbs to the gravitational pull from its center of gravity. The only way to get all the mass as close to planet's center of gravity as possible is to form a sphere.
Besides, you're still not explaining what causes the heavy mass to fall onto the tarp.
Yea, I see your point, but what exactly is gravity anyway?
I've asked this question to 'experts' and they can't give me a technical definition for it. I'm convinced no one can. I don't even believe it exists. If you've read any of Velikovsky's work on gravitation, perhaps you'll see where I'm coming from.