Many of you already know that the CIA is far more involved in the media than most people realize, including some of the most obvious targets like
Anderson Cooper, who interned with the CIA, and expect us to believe it's no big deal or Dana Bash who married into the CIA, for a while and of
course that they routinely allow commentators from the CIA to present themselves as experts, even though they never allow critics of the media, peace
activists or other human rights advocates have any media time.
Of course, they also portray the alternative media outlets as fringe, but do they, or other political organizations, control a large portion of these
alternative media outlets helping to rig the elections for establishment candidates?
I think the evidence indicates that the establishment certainly does although it isn't always clear which organizations they control. Some of them
are obvious as I found out a while back when I though the Daily Kos was a good progressive site, but then found they ban criticism of establishment
candidates and support for expanding the debate.
The CIA has almost certainly been supporting social psychology research experiments dating back to the sixties, when they supported the
Obedience to Authority Experiments (my review indicating
military used thios for opposite of what they claimed)
Stanford Prison Experiment (used to develop boot camp
indoctrination tactics contrary to what they claim)
and these same studies, and many others, have been used to develop propaganda as well. Their
have also been reports about them manipulating many major media outlets as well, and it doesn't take a lot of research to realize that the media did
far more to rig the election for either Trump or Clinton by simply refusing to cover grassroots candidates that aren't selling out the public.
Also as many people here know there have been major unsolved mysteries involving UFOs and Philip Corso's claims that alien technology has been shared
with the government and major corporations. Evidence also indicates that megaliths couldn't have been moved by ancient technology which challenges
many of our beliefs.
If part of this is true do they want to control as much disclosure as possible and release the truth only when it suits their purposes? Seems
reasonable and since the mainstream media controls the History Channel's "Ancient Aliens" series which was preceded here by
Skyfloating "Ancient Extraterrestrials"
a few months before the original premiere
although most of us didn't know it was coming at that time.
There has been some speculation that ATS has been financed by the CIA dating back to at least 2004 when Springer denied it and again in 2012 when
anonymous made similar alleged claims and there were claims coming from both side accusing the other of working for the CIA, as often happens if you
spend enough to on conspiracy theories.
Presumably if the CIA was hiding something, and they wanted to disclose at least part of it at some point, they might want to control the sources, and
could easily arrange for the MSM to provide coverage for people that don't sound credible on Ancient Aliens at all, but the skeptics also make their
own blunders confusing the issues.
My latest article on psychological research and censorship on alternative media outlets explores how the CIA might have been involved in some of this
including a small site that hardly anyone heard of which I was invited to join, but suspect they might have an ulterior motive, censorship at the
Daily Kos and ImgFlip and a segment about how it might be related to disclose of ancient mysteries including why they might like to control content at
conspiracy boards where I wrote the following about ATS
There are routinely even questions about that going back over a decade, even about the most common of those, Above Top Secret when someone asked
in 2004 Is Above Top Secret website a CIA front? 2004- and Springer the ATS owner responded, "For the record, I can ASSURE anyone here that the CIA
does not fund this site. The MWA has been known to invest in this site in the past and plans on continuing the practice as needed for security
upgrades and other things." but it has come up again since then according to Is Abovetopsecret.com Run By Agents/Cia?? Something Shifty About That
Site 2013 and several other articles the hacker group Anonymous exposed ATS as a CIA front however, not surprisingly, people from ATS in Who are
Anonymous who is behind Anonymous, what is their Agenda? deny it and claim that Anonymous might be working for the CIA.
How can we tell which is which?
We might not be able to for sure without additional information, at least; however there might be some way to narrow it down depending on what the CIA
is trying to accomplish, how and why.
As I have written in the past there is enough evidence raising doubts about the early development of civilization, including megaliths, well over a
hundred tons some over seven hundred tons, that were moved long distances, by people that allegedly only had primitive tools, even though experiments
to move megaliths above ten tons had to cheat and only had limited success. This leads me to believe that there might have been some influence from an
unknown advanced intelligence, possibly ancient aliens, as I reported in previous articles including, Is Stanton Friedman working for the CIA to
refute reverse engineering claims? Hurricane Apocalypse Coming With or Without Fringe Conspiracy Theory and Looming North Korea Nuclear Apocalypse
Result of Incompetence? Or Staged?
Above Top Secret has been reporting on these alleged aliens for years, and there should be no doubt that if they're partly true, at a minimum, the
CIA would be observing them and almost certainly having people sign up to present their own arguments. If possible there is no doubt that they would
want to influence the moderators, and if they think they can they would try to arrange for some of them to work for them; or perhaps the rumors are
correct and that they really are working for the CIA so they can disclose information when they want in the manner they want, often, when it suites
their purposes in a manner that only the most credulous would believe or in a way that it seems like a crazy conspiracy theory so few would believe
Are all the media outlets controlled by major corporations or well financed people, often without full disclosure of what biases they might have?
Complete Article "Is CIA studying support for censorship
on the internet?"
Does anyone here think that the CIA is trying to, at a minimum read the content here and provide their own input as a variety of members? Surely that
would be the minimum they would do. Are they arranging for various organizations to confuse the issue so disclosure doesn't happen until it suits