It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Irreducible complexity and Evolution

page: 76
16
<< 73  74  75    77  78  79 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 02:54 AM
link   
a reply to: 5StarOracle

Time wise? Interesting.
Odds don't have much to do with time but how much time?

But I thought you were ok with evolution.

edit on 11/30/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)




posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 02:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Akragon

I read it



posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 02:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Akragon

I believe that the odds of it being the latter are somewhere in the vicinity of 10^666



posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 02:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Billions of years



posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 02:56 AM
link   
a reply to: 5StarOracle
That's enlightening.



posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 02:57 AM
link   
a reply to: 5StarOracle

and this estimate is derived from where?



posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 02:58 AM
link   
a reply to: peter vlar

I beg to differ because there has been multiple repeat winners of lotteries...
There are individuals who find ways to manipulate the variables...
No I am not one of them...

edit on 30-11-2017 by 5StarOracle because: Word



posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 02:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Akragon

I read it


did you notice anything saying these experiments arn't assumptions, and are testable and repeatable?




posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 02:59 AM
link   
a reply to: 5StarOracle

Not sure what lotteries have to do w my reply to Akragon, which was sarcastic humor that whizzed right past your scalp.



posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 03:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Akragon

It was about a repeat lotto winner not a science experiment...



posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 03:01 AM
link   
a reply to: 5StarOracle

So, what are the odds?



posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 03:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Akragon

It was about a repeat lotto winner not a science experiment...


lol no...

No it really wasn't




posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 03:02 AM
link   
a reply to: peter vlar

My bad I seen your triple 6 you are so clever having done that...
You are so much smarter than I...



posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 03:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

The odds can't be accurately portrayed because he has found a way to over come the odds...
For a few hundred dollars another multiple winner will teach you how...
edit on 30-11-2017 by 5StarOracle because: Word



posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 03:03 AM
link   
a reply to: 5StarOracle

He cheated?
How very godlike.



posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 03:07 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

I dunno how he did it but I would assume he cheated somehow I know there were scratch tickets involved...
Maybe he has an app he made that can scan through the tickets he invented...



posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 03:11 AM
link   
a reply to: 5StarOracle

Right.
Because the odds say it couldn't happen.

Oh wait, actually the odds don't say that. Do they?



posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 03:11 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

How has God cheated you?
What's that about?



posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 03:12 AM
link   
a reply to: 5StarOracle

whats with this lottery crap?

Isn't there a winner in most of them in any case?

Check out the winners in bacteria




posted on Nov, 30 2017 @ 03:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Hmm lets see 3 winning tickets sent to the same town in a vicinity close enough for the same person to buy them...
I like those odds...







 
16
<< 73  74  75    77  78  79 >>

log in

join