It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

RUMOR - President Trump Suspects That Steve Bannon LEAKS Damaging Information.

page: 2
6
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 12:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: JacKatMtn
It's a Wonderful thing to see... The MSM in full blown attack mode..

Spoon feeding sheep...



As long as President Trump and/or people in his orbit are being attacked by the dimwit media, he must be on the right track.. Whether it's North Korea, ObamaCare, Supreme Court Nominees...whatever.




posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 12:42 AM
link   
a reply to: Vorian

Bannon was good at using his Breitbart publication to help make Hillary look like an even worse candidate than she was. But you're right.. If Bannon is a habitual leaker, he has to go. If he's not serving a useful purpose, he's a distraction. There's enough distractions outside the White House.



posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 12:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vorian

originally posted by: 3daysgone
a reply to: Vorian




YES, it has been like this for a very long time. More than 40 years.


If you believe that, then you cannot be reasoned with. No other President in recorded history has been in the news as much as our current President in their first 8 months of office. So I beg to differ. 10 years ago we did not have our communication system that we have today. So yes Miss Vorian. I am afraid you are wrong, and don't take that the wrong way. We are all wrong at something.


He puts himself in the news. He says and does stupid and outrageous things. He uses social media like a 14 year old boy. Of course he is constantly in the news. He probably tweets more than Kim Kardashian.

He uses Twitter to convey US policy. That is also nuts and also puts him in the news.


Are you referring to this Rumor as the President putting himself in the news?
So you admit that the news covers President Trump at what would easily be considered enormous proportions compared to any other President. Good.




He says and does stupid and outrageous things.


Please elaborate in order to prove what point you are trying to make.




He uses social media like a 14 year old boy. Of course he is constantly in the news.


Could you provide the studies that have been conducted of the comparisons of President Trump and a 14 year old boy as pertains to social media? Maybe call in a specialist. Antedeluvian might be available.




He uses Twitter to convey US policy. That is also nuts and also puts him in the news.


So let me get this straight Miss Vorian. You are saying that informing the citizens of the U.S. of policies that will affect them, in the most efficient manner possible, is nuts? I rest my case. My initial assumption was correct. You cannot be reasoned with.

edit on 13-8-2017 by 3daysgone because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 12:49 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

I think you may be right. You can fool some of the people some of the time, and all of the people all of......well you just shouldn't fool people.



posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 12:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Vorian

Bannon was good at using his Breitbart publication to help make Hillary look like an even worse candidate than she was. But you're right.. If Bannon is a habitual leaker, he has to go. If he's not serving a useful purpose, he's a distraction. There's enough distractions outside the White House.



IF??? Bannon was the most obvious nut to begin with.



posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 12:51 AM
link   
a reply to: 3daysgone

Have you tried to reason with Vorian for awhile? You sound disappointed, 3daysgone. Are you young? At age 45, I stopped trying to change people's minds.



posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 12:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Vorian

Bannon was good at using his Breitbart publication to help make Hillary look like an even worse candidate than she was. But you're right.. If Bannon is a habitual leaker, he has to go. If he's not serving a useful purpose, he's a distraction. There's enough distractions outside the White House.



That would beg the question though. Do you really want to get rid of the guy that got you to the ball, and also knows how he got you there? That is unless Trump is confident in the outcome.



posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 12:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: 3daysgone

Have you tried to reason with Vorian for awhile? You sound disappointed, 3daysgone. Are you young? At age 45, I stopped trying to change people's minds.



But if we can save just one, it is worth it.



posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 12:55 AM
link   
a reply to: 3daysgone

Trump is an idiot for using Twitter. He mainly uses it to insult people, even people that work for him.

If he ever uses it, he should use @POTUS to say something useful to the people. Something not divisive and it is really inappropriate to make policy using Twitter. IE: Transgenders no longer allowed in the military when no General or DOJ person had been talked to..but Trump felt like lying about it.



posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 12:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vorian

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Vorian

Bannon was good at using his Breitbart publication to help make Hillary look like an even worse candidate than she was. But you're right.. If Bannon is a habitual leaker, he has to go. If he's not serving a useful purpose, he's a distraction. There's enough distractions outside the White House.



IF??? Bannon was the most obvious nut to begin with.


Obviously you have studied his personality and habits. I have no clue, other than he was an owner of Breitbart, and before that, a U.S. Navy officer. Being former Navy myself I was glad to see him appointed as a trusted advisor. But if Bannon's not trustworthy, he's got to go. CNN is worse than 100 Bannons...but that's another thread.



posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 12:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: 3daysgone

Have you tried to reason with Vorian for awhile? You sound disappointed, 3daysgone. Are you young? At age 45, I stopped trying to change people's minds.



How old do you think I am? Have I changed so much?



posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 12:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Vorian

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Vorian

Bannon was good at using his Breitbart publication to help make Hillary look like an even worse candidate than she was. But you're right.. If Bannon is a habitual leaker, he has to go. If he's not serving a useful purpose, he's a distraction. There's enough distractions outside the White House.



IF??? Bannon was the most obvious nut to begin with.


Obviously you have studied his personality and habits. I have no clue, other than he was an owner of Breitbart, and before that, a U.S. Navy officer. Being former Navy myself I was glad to see him appointed as a trusted advisor. But if Bannon's not trustworthy, he's got to go. CNN is worse than 100 Bannons...but that's another thread.


No, one Bannon is worse that 1 million CNNs. One FOX is worse than 1 Bannon, maybe.



posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 12:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: 3daysgone

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: 3daysgone

Have you tried to reason with Vorian for awhile? You sound disappointed, 3daysgone. Are you young? At age 45, I stopped trying to change people's minds.



But if we can save just one, it is worth it.


It depends on how much effort you must exert to "save" that one. Usually, people who really use their brain, will find their own way. I voted for Obama in 2008. But after a couple of years, my BRAIN (not my heart) told me that it was a mistake.



posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 01:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Vorian




and it is really inappropriate to make policy using Twitter.


Miss Vorian my dear. He doesn't make the policy using Twitter. He announces a policy using Twitter. To inform the Public. I would have to add, that the Trump Presidency has also been the most transparent Presidencies ever. Do you want a Transparent President, or not?




IE: Transgenders no longer allowed in the military when no General or DOJ person had been talked to..but Trump felt like lying about it.
l

As Commander n Chief of the military he doesn't have to. They have to follow his orders according the United Military Code of Conduct. They are subject to his Authority. So he would not have had to lie about it. He only has to inform them about it so it can take effect.
edit on 13-8-2017 by 3daysgone because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 01:02 AM
link   
Regardless, Trump picked Bannon and his motley group of idiots. The Trump sons automatically came with him.

Civil rights will go back 50 years.




posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 01:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: Vorian

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: 3daysgone

Have you tried to reason with Vorian for awhile? You sound disappointed, 3daysgone. Are you young? At age 45, I stopped trying to change people's minds.



How old do you think I am? Have I changed so much?


The age question was directed at 3DaysGone, due to his seeming disappointment with not being able to get you thinking more like him/her. Sorry if it wasn't clear.



posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 01:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: 3daysgone

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: 3daysgone

Have you tried to reason with Vorian for awhile? You sound disappointed, 3daysgone. Are you young? At age 45, I stopped trying to change people's minds.



But if we can save just one, it is worth it.


It depends on how much effort you must exert to "save" that one. Usually, people who really use their brain, will find their own way. I voted for Obama in 2008. But after a couple of years, my BRAIN (not my heart) told me that it was a mistake.


It is not about changing their minds anyway. It is about planting a seed. That is why I do it. You remember when you were young and free right? Now that you are older you now know how dumb you use to be.



posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 01:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Vorian




Civil rights will go back 50 years.


Can you please explain what civil rights have been broken?



posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 01:05 AM
link   
a reply to: pheonix358

No yes men??? Seriously???

That's all he wants around him. That's why he demands their loyalty to him and gets upset if he doesn't get it.

The problem is that yes men end up going along with Trumps bad ideas because they have no other option. But since Trump can't take the heat for it, they do, he fires them and blames them for it and moves on to the next yes man.

Yes men are the major pieces on the chessboard that get hit protecting the king for the bad moves he makes in the game. Pretty soon you have lost too many of them and it's only a matter of time until game over.



posted on Aug, 13 2017 @ 01:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Vorian

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: 3daysgone

Have you tried to reason with Vorian for awhile? You sound disappointed, 3daysgone. Are you young? At age 45, I stopped trying to change people's minds.



How old do you think I am? Have I changed so much?


The age question was directed at 3DaysGone, due to his seeming disappointment with not being able to get you thinking more like him/her. Sorry if it wasn't clear.


sorry, getting late
edit on 13-8-2017 by Vorian because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join