It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JacKatMtn
It's a Wonderful thing to see... The MSM in full blown attack mode..
Spoon feeding sheep...
originally posted by: Vorian
originally posted by: 3daysgone
a reply to: Vorian
YES, it has been like this for a very long time. More than 40 years.
If you believe that, then you cannot be reasoned with. No other President in recorded history has been in the news as much as our current President in their first 8 months of office. So I beg to differ. 10 years ago we did not have our communication system that we have today. So yes Miss Vorian. I am afraid you are wrong, and don't take that the wrong way. We are all wrong at something.
He puts himself in the news. He says and does stupid and outrageous things. He uses social media like a 14 year old boy. Of course he is constantly in the news. He probably tweets more than Kim Kardashian.
He uses Twitter to convey US policy. That is also nuts and also puts him in the news.
He says and does stupid and outrageous things.
He uses social media like a 14 year old boy. Of course he is constantly in the news.
He uses Twitter to convey US policy. That is also nuts and also puts him in the news.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Vorian
Bannon was good at using his Breitbart publication to help make Hillary look like an even worse candidate than she was. But you're right.. If Bannon is a habitual leaker, he has to go. If he's not serving a useful purpose, he's a distraction. There's enough distractions outside the White House.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Vorian
Bannon was good at using his Breitbart publication to help make Hillary look like an even worse candidate than she was. But you're right.. If Bannon is a habitual leaker, he has to go. If he's not serving a useful purpose, he's a distraction. There's enough distractions outside the White House.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: 3daysgone
Have you tried to reason with Vorian for awhile? You sound disappointed, 3daysgone. Are you young? At age 45, I stopped trying to change people's minds.
originally posted by: Vorian
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Vorian
Bannon was good at using his Breitbart publication to help make Hillary look like an even worse candidate than she was. But you're right.. If Bannon is a habitual leaker, he has to go. If he's not serving a useful purpose, he's a distraction. There's enough distractions outside the White House.
IF??? Bannon was the most obvious nut to begin with.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: 3daysgone
Have you tried to reason with Vorian for awhile? You sound disappointed, 3daysgone. Are you young? At age 45, I stopped trying to change people's minds.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Vorian
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Vorian
Bannon was good at using his Breitbart publication to help make Hillary look like an even worse candidate than she was. But you're right.. If Bannon is a habitual leaker, he has to go. If he's not serving a useful purpose, he's a distraction. There's enough distractions outside the White House.
IF??? Bannon was the most obvious nut to begin with.
Obviously you have studied his personality and habits. I have no clue, other than he was an owner of Breitbart, and before that, a U.S. Navy officer. Being former Navy myself I was glad to see him appointed as a trusted advisor. But if Bannon's not trustworthy, he's got to go. CNN is worse than 100 Bannons...but that's another thread.
originally posted by: 3daysgone
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: 3daysgone
Have you tried to reason with Vorian for awhile? You sound disappointed, 3daysgone. Are you young? At age 45, I stopped trying to change people's minds.
But if we can save just one, it is worth it.
and it is really inappropriate to make policy using Twitter.
l
IE: Transgenders no longer allowed in the military when no General or DOJ person had been talked to..but Trump felt like lying about it.
originally posted by: Vorian
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: 3daysgone
Have you tried to reason with Vorian for awhile? You sound disappointed, 3daysgone. Are you young? At age 45, I stopped trying to change people's minds.
How old do you think I am? Have I changed so much?
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: 3daysgone
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: 3daysgone
Have you tried to reason with Vorian for awhile? You sound disappointed, 3daysgone. Are you young? At age 45, I stopped trying to change people's minds.
But if we can save just one, it is worth it.
It depends on how much effort you must exert to "save" that one. Usually, people who really use their brain, will find their own way. I voted for Obama in 2008. But after a couple of years, my BRAIN (not my heart) told me that it was a mistake.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Vorian
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: 3daysgone
Have you tried to reason with Vorian for awhile? You sound disappointed, 3daysgone. Are you young? At age 45, I stopped trying to change people's minds.
How old do you think I am? Have I changed so much?
The age question was directed at 3DaysGone, due to his seeming disappointment with not being able to get you thinking more like him/her. Sorry if it wasn't clear.