It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Mike.Ockizard
a reply to: Gryphon66
Trick question. Sometimes.
originally posted by: Templeton
a reply to: Gryphon66
I would be, you know, happy to help out a fellow member. However, this is all common knowledge that is easily researched. Example, the left had a voter fraud investigation immediately after the election, but only in red counties and fight vigorously against auditing blue counties as a threat to democracy. Even their enforcement team, Antifa, is using markedly fascist tactics while screaming about Nazis. Help me narrow it down. Which points do you, you know, contest?
originally posted by: Templeton
a reply to: Kali74 Democrats have really drilled in the point this year that they have no place for democracy. If they did they would accept the leader that the vast majority of the country selected.
originally posted by: Mike.Ockizard
a reply to: Byrd
Agreed that size isn't everything
Efficiency through teamwork hasn't worked out that way. If everyone was all-in and proportionally share the cost and the work, sure. I might not be well informed but the only bases I see shut down are those deserted do to us not having troop strength or those in the US shut down by efforts to reduce the military.
In my military experience, if you give a general budget he'll spend it and want more. If you give the pentagon money the same applies. And that's not taking into account the black budget that continues to grow.
originally posted by: tribal
a reply to: Lucidparadox
what are you if youre not nationalist?
originally posted by: AutonomousMeatPuppet
My understanding is that most lower ranks of military are conservative, higher ups such as generals are mostly liberal.
originally posted by: Templeton
a reply to: Byrd
There is, but accepting the win is not an option. The DNC's goal, as defined by their leaders, is to get Trump out of office. By any means necessary.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: Templeton
a reply to: Byrd
There is, but accepting the win is not an option. The DNC's goal, as defined by their leaders, is to get Trump out of office. By any means necessary.
That's just politics as usual. Trying to remove Trump, trying to remove Obama, trying to remove W, trying to remove Clinton. There have been major pushes for all of those. I'm sure that if I were older I would be able to point to instances of trying to remove HW, Reagan, Carter, Ford, and Nixon too.
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: Templeton
I disagree. If anything I think the resistance to Trump is milder than it was to Obama and both of them have had it easier than W did.
My theory is that due to the internet and the gradual expansion of it, the cries against each President have grown more numerous, but it's also diluted the force behind them. I think there's some legitimate criticisms of Trump, just as there are against all Presidents or people but the signal to noise ratio is pretty high. Most of it is nonsense, and most of the population is able to figure that out.
originally posted by: Mike.Ockizard
a reply to: Doctor Smith
Something odd going on here. The military on the side of the globalist? Doesn't make sense to me why a military man would back a group intent on reducing the military budget.