It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Airborne Laser did find some success on the test range on several occasions in 2010 and 2011 (see the Missile Defense Agency's full list), but by that point the writing was already etched on the wall: the Pentagon was pretty much done with this experiment in directed-energy weaponry. In 2009, Defense Secretary Robert Gates scrapped plans to build a second plane (the Air Force had once thought it might have as many as seven Airborne Lasers), and the one existing aircraft cruised to a lonely fate as an R&D effort only.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: intrptr
And you can't prove that there was ever more than one plane ever built. You can't find a hangar that supports it, or evidence of fuel being produced for the laser, or anything else. You can make all the wild claims you want to make, but you don't have a shred of evidence beyond "I say it's so, so it's true".
...Isn't that kind of the point? I've long held that we should never unviel our weapons platform, sounds like a strategic blunder to me.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: intrptr
And you can't prove that there was ever more than one plane ever built. You can't find a hangar that supports it, or evidence of fuel being produced for the laser, or anything else. You can make all the wild claims you want to make, but you don't have a shred of evidence beyond "I say it's so, so it's true".
There was one prototype built, and it was destroyed. Just because one was built doesn't mean that there were more. There was a reason it was renamed the Airborne Laser Testbed.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: intrptr
Mobile GROUND BASED LASERS. So which did they do? Fly a 747 that there's no evidence exists, disguised as a commercial flight and blow it up? Or drive a truck next to the launch site and blow it up that way? The two are NOT interchangeable.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: intrptr
If it was that simple they'd simply take a ground based system, slap it on an aircraft and be done with it. Airborne lasers require modification that ground based lasers don't. Such as power systems, and reducing the weight of the lasers, if you want them for more than just self defense lasers.
originally posted by: Cauliflower
I watched the video for clues but the launch starting at 54 minutes looked normal.
Its heavily choreographed with telescope and on board footage.
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: intrptr
And you can't prove that there was ever more than one plane ever built. You can't find a hangar that supports it, or evidence of fuel being produced for the laser, or anything else. You can make all the wild claims you want to make, but you don't have a shred of evidence beyond "I say it's so, so it's true".
The technology exists has been under development since star wars era. There was at least one prototype built.
I got more 'proof'' on my side than you.
But thanks for playing along...
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: intrptr
And you can't prove that there was ever more than one plane ever built. You can't find a hangar that supports it, or evidence of fuel being produced for the laser, or anything else. You can make all the wild claims you want to make, but you don't have a shred of evidence beyond "I say it's so, so it's true".
The technology exists has been under development since star wars era. There was at least one prototype built.
I got more 'proof'' on my side than you.
But thanks for playing along...
Gonna be pretty funny to have any other prototypes without lasers. There was one , and only one laser built.And that was in the early 80s.
Peace.