It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I believe what I believe
It's what makes me what I am
No, I did not make it
No, it is making me
Originally posted by junglejake
My faith defines me. If you see that as a crutch, that's fine; I see it as my legs.
Originally posted by junglejake
Not when argueing with someone who doesn't believe, this is true. However, I believe God created us and knows what works and doesn't for us.
I am not so willing to pass up my choice and indepedence to somethign which may or may not exist. You faithful can be led like sheep if you wish, but I see no reason for something as simple as people being together as a major catastrophe that will ruin society.
It wasn't a crazy power trip he had in saying it was wrong, there are huge social implications of not only saying this is acceptable but lashing out and calling anyone who disagrees a horrible person. I guess I don't really feel there is no secular backing for saying that behavior is wrong.
There are secular objectors, yes. But the fact of the matter is I'm not calling you a horrible person. I disagree with you, and when you offer up the argument that "Gods says THIS.", it sorta doesn't cut mustard.
I also think deamonizing that sin above all others is wrong, as well, though. Being actively gay is no worse than me pirating software. However, me pirating sotware is no worse then Dahmer killin' folks.
In the eyes of God, that is.
See, therein lies the problem. Because of your faith, are you supposed to operate accordign to different rules than the rest of us? What right do you have to force your views on us?
DE
Originally posted by DeusEx
Thing is, I'm not stopping you from doing anything, while you are forcing others from doing something. There is a big difference between you depriving someone of their rights because of your religious views, and me enforcing laws that deprive BOTH of us.
thus, we have the harm principle. You are doing harm by denying someone a right, while I am not by giving it to them.
DE
Originally posted by junglejake
Abortion.
In my view, it's legal murder. In yours (I'm guessing) it's a woman's right.
Originally posted by junglejake
Hitler was a bad, bad, bad man. No one in a place of power has come near achieving his level of evil, and even those who may have enough checks and balances to prevent them from doing so that it won't happen. Especially in America unless 75% of the population supports the regime.
Originally posted by DeusEx
Not protect them from themselves, give them an alternative to a desperate, last ditch attempt at salvaging their life in such a brutal way. There is still a stigma attached to single mothers, PARTICULARLY those from a religious background. Anyways, in a lot of cases single motherhood ends up being social suicide. They must work constantly to ensure just the basics for their child, all while ostracized by both their family and friends.
You sound like YOU support forcing women not to have sex, because if they didn't have sex, they wouldn't have to murder their children.
DE
Norma McCorvey has changed her view on abortion and now directs the Crossing Over Ministry, a nonprofit anti-abortion organization. Last year she filed a motion with the U.S. District Court in Dallas requesting that Roe v. Wade be reversed, and more recently a federal judge agreed to hear her arguments.
Originally posted by DeusEx
So, flyersfan, how shall we analogize your
country's slide into fascism without the most
obvious parallel? Would you prefer Pinochet,
perhaps Mussolini?
Originally posted by Shadowflux
However, Bush hasn't followed "Facism for Dummies" close enough, he seemed to have forgotten the chapter on "Executing the Opposition" since John kerry is still free to go wind surfing and get his nails done.