It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
President Donald Trump will not exert executive privilege over former FBI Director James Comey as he is set to testify this week on Capitol Hill.
A statement from Press Secretary Sean Spicer released Monday afternoon read:
The President’s power to assert executive privilege is well-established. However, in order to facilitate a swift and thorough examination of the facts sought by the Senate Intelligence Committee, President Trump will not assert executive privilege regarding James Comey’s scheduled testimony.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
To be fair if he did block him it would basically just be as good as admitting that he is guilty of something.
This way if Comey does say something Trump does not like he can deny it or dismiss it as lies and fake news.
Trump Will Not Block James Comey Testimony . . .Will Trump do the "Executive Privilege" thing with former FBI Director Comey?
originally posted by: Liquesence
Trump Will Not Block James Comey Testimony . . .Will Trump do the "Executive Privilege" thing with former FBI Director Comey?
He can't.
He fired Comey; therefore, Comey is no longer under his jurisdiction as a federal employee.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Liquesence
Not only that but in tweeting about the conversation (Comey better hope there are no recordings of that conversation...) and talking about it to the Russian spies he invited into the oval office he can't then claim the conversation was privileged.
Everybody knew that including the Whitehouse staff.
This is a gesture . An empty gesture like a liar yelling "hook me up to a lie detector" when he knows it would be inadmissible in a court of law.
Not only that but in tweeting about the conversation
“You told me during an interview that you and Mr. Holder did not authorize the Fast and Furious operation that allowed 2,000 weapons from the United States into Mexico and they were in the drug trafficking [cartels’] hands,” Univision co-host Jorge Ramos asked Obama, according to a translator, during the interview. “I think that up to 100 Mexicans might have died and also American agent Brian Terry. There’s a report that 14 agents were responsible for the operation but shouldn’t the attorney general, Eric Holder, he should have known about that and if he didn’t, should you fire him?” Obama responded with similar talking points his administration has used time and again. “Well, first of all, I think it’s important to understand that the Fast and Furious program was a field-initiated program, begun under the previous administration,” Obama said. “When Eric Holder found out about it, he discontinued it. We assigned an inspector general to do a thorough report that was just issued — confirming that in fact Eric Holder did not know about this, that he took prompt action and that the people who did initiate this were held accountable. But, what I think is most important is recognizing that we’ve got a challenge in terms of weapons flowing south, and the strategy that was pursued out of Arizona, obviously, was completely wrongheaded. Those folks who were responsible have been held accountable. The question now is, how do we move forward with a strategy that will actually work?”
originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: Sillyolme
Not only that but in tweeting about the conversation
Correct. He can't reasonably claim executive privilege (regarding confidential information) if he himself went public with information regarding that discussion, because going public means it's no longer private or confidential.