It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
Sorry, logical fallacy. 19% of US Muslims refuse to say terrorist attacks are always wrong.
originally posted by: SBMcG
a reply to: chr0naut
I have a personal rule that I don’t respond to posts this long after the fact – I guess I was too caught up in yesterday’s latest London Moslem terrorist slaughter to catch your reply last night, and then this morning made the mistake of hitting the golf course, so I’m starting out a little behind the curve today. Apologies...
However, I sincerely feel your reply demands a response because it is replete with unprovable and outright false declarations, bad chemistry, and what I know to be leftist “one world” talking points.
For the record, I am not a climate change denier. I know the climate is changing as it always has and always will. For the record, I have a graduate degree and my minor was chemistry. I certainly don’t claim to be anything approaching an expert either way, but I can draw my conclusions based upon what we do know, including the fraud, lies, and manipulated data leftists and man-made climate hustlers are still relying upon to forward their agenda.
Before we can even begin to discuss actual climate science, we have to get past the claim that there is “scientific consensus” on the Chicken Little theory of “man-made” climate change because that consensus is based upon a mountain of faked, flawed, and bogus “science”.
How many of your claims are based upon this proven fake data?
You completely blew off the fact that climate has changed – from cooler to warmer and back again, as a part of Earth’s natural rhythm since the Dawn of Time.
Your assertion was that these changes were caused by one-off catastrophic events like asteroids and volcanism. There have been millions of climate cycles in Earth’s pre-human history. That’s a hell of a lot of meteors…
You claimed that…
What is plain is that Ozone is now being depleted by chlorofluorocarbons and that the burning of fossil fuels is releasing far more greenhouse gasses now than nature could possibly release through its normal processes of decomposition and digestion.<
Let me ask you this… Assuming I don’t need to go through the basic chemistry with you, can you explain to me how a compound as “heavy” as the most common human-generated CFC -- CCl₃F, “floats” all the way up through the relatively “light” troposphere into the lighter-than-air ozone layer where there’s almost no uplift?
How much CFC originating on the surface ends up in the ozone layer? How much is neutralized immediately upon release by bonding or reacting with hydroxyl or nitrate radicals in the lower atmosphere?
First, we find that the CO₂ numbers are completely faked, as is much of the “official” climate data. That compromised data is still being used to forward a lie, but because more and more people are getting wise to that lie, all of a sudden, the culprit must be CFC’s rather than carbon dioxide.
The problem with that is, CFC’s don’t cause climate change.