It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why NASA cant tell the truth about Mars

page: 2
14
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 15 2017 @ 06:41 AM
link   
I would ask if the OP has any proof of life on Mars but since they don't it all comes down to belief and no amount of new agey YouTube videos proclaiming space armadas is going to change the fact that Mars as we know it , is desolate.

As to the naive question on "if no life on Mars why do we keep going back" ... Just because their is no life doesn't mean something unknown isn't worth exploring.




posted on May, 15 2017 @ 06:49 AM
link   
has all water got life in it??? i tried googling but couldn't find an answer.....



posted on May, 15 2017 @ 06:50 AM
link   
a reply to: opethPA

eh.... you should put intelligent before life, then your post makes sense..



posted on May, 15 2017 @ 07:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: data5091
never a straight answer!!!! If Mars is as dead as we are led to believe, then why do we keep going back there?




Why do people keep climbing mountains?



posted on May, 15 2017 @ 07:24 AM
link   
Can anyone show me the actual proof that the world's religious institutions are in fear of life being discovered elsewhere in the universe and/or would react in the way the OP has told us they would in a light of such a discovery?
edit on 15-5-2017 by CulturalResilience because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 15 2017 @ 07:54 AM
link   
The religions would just "interpret" the religious texts differently so they kind of fit with new facts.

They have been doing that ever since religions were created.



posted on May, 15 2017 @ 07:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: data5091
never a straight answer!!!! If Mars is as dead as we are led to believe, then why do we keep going back there?


That`s a great question,
as I recall the reason NASA gave for ending the moon missions was because the moon is dead,there is nothing there, we have seen everything there is to see on the moon and we have enough moon rocks to study.

why is there even talk of sending humans to mars? mars is dead,there is nothing there,we have seen everything there is to see on mars.
I would guess that the 3 rovers we sent to mars have seen more of the martian surface than all the moon missions saw of the moon surface.from the little bit of the moon that the astronauts actually saw and explored it was concluded that there was nothing else to see and more moon missions would be a waste of time and money.
so, why would more mars missions also not be a waste of time and money?


edit on 15-5-2017 by Tardacus because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 15 2017 @ 08:25 AM
link   
Not everyone is ready to learn the truth. Life now is perfect the way it is. With every flaw and perfection in every corner of our global.




posted on May, 15 2017 @ 08:29 AM
link   
At this point NASA could say they found life on Mars , I mean who's going to believe them...



posted on May, 15 2017 @ 08:32 AM
link   
NASA may be guilty of not revealing just what they know, I have no idea, but I do know that the truth will NEVER come to us in the form of a You Tube video and neither will any sort of "Disclosure" come about as a result of a You Tube video.



posted on May, 15 2017 @ 08:42 AM
link   
a reply to: anonentity

I've watched the video and in that time, I see a rush to derail the guts of the thread into discussions over trivial things like "Gulliver's Travels," etc. That is a common practice for ordinary folks that have side issues/interests and dedicated disinfo specialist.

To the point of the thread: Andrew Johnson was careful to not get too far out in his thinking in directly bringing acts of intelligent Martian into his discussions, so I need to point out an area when he failed to go which is indicative to the whole basis story about Mars as indicated by the existence of Phobos and which solves the whole question about Mars.

Early on on the screen are details of the 2010 paper in Geophysical Research Letters that quotes its findings of "large voids" in the interior of the little moon it goes on to admonish us of what not to think: "When applied to various hypothesis bearing on the origins of Phobos, these results are inconsistent with the prepositional that Phobos is a captured asteroid."

I have repeatedly stated on ATS over the years that the grooves on Phobos are caused by it being intelligently manipulated into its close orbit around Mars. As it was drastically moved into position, its surface materials were sloughed off in the weak gravity. It was and is an asteroid!

Of course, as with the denial about the organic materials that weren't found by the Viking landers, they can't yet allow that it was an asteroid because that would be, as I've said many times, the key to unlocking the secrets of Mars and goes a long way toward explaining our constant visitors, the UFOs.
edit on 15-5-2017 by Aliensun because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 15 2017 @ 09:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: moebius
a reply to: anonentity

Sounds more like:

NASA is not telling me what I want to hear, so I'll make something up to explain why.


THIS sounds more like:

"I learned all there is about Mars in church and 4th grade science class and nothing else is even possible because church."



posted on May, 15 2017 @ 09:42 AM
link   
I don't buy the religious argument against disclosure any more. It's very outdated and does not reflect just how flexible the majority of people's religious beliefs really are these days. Look at the polls in the United States and you will see more generalized "I believe in a superior being" answers and less "I am wedded to this very narrow and rigid religious philosophy."



posted on May, 15 2017 @ 09:51 AM
link   
I'm going to make a statement which I believe to accurate. Correct me if I am wrong.

"The only facts we know about Mars are the ones that we have been told by Nasa."

Everyone here arguing about the condition on the surface of mars, water/no water, no atmosphere, whatever...

These things are all based on the fact that you are simply believing the information provided to you by the only agency that has supposedly been there.

Have any of you been there and can state factual evidence of what is on the planet other than the telemitry provided by nasa rovers?



posted on May, 15 2017 @ 10:03 AM
link   
a reply to: anonentity

Your guy in the video discussing phobos is clueless. First it will be in orbit another 50 million years, he thinks its about to crash lol. Second no one said its hollow what they did say is the density is lower than objects from the asteroid belt. No one thinks its hollow but it is suspected there is voids about 25 percent of volume. This is why they think it coalesced in orbit. The moon was discovered in 1877 so again not sure what hes talking about. And by the way someone re released this it was originally made in 2010 before curiosity reached mars. By the way they found through chemical analysis the building blocks for life. They were just short of saying they found life the reason being is it wasnt 100 percent. We have learned a couple of things since then,
edit on 5/15/17 by dragonridr because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 15 2017 @ 10:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: JerseyGuy
I'm going to make a statement which I believe to accurate. Correct me if I am wrong.

"The only facts we know about Mars are the ones that we have been told by Nasa."

Everyone here arguing about the condition on the surface of mars, water/no water, no atmosphere, whatever...

These things are all based on the fact that you are simply believing the information provided to you by the only agency that has supposedly been there.

Have any of you been there and can state factual evidence of what is on the planet other than the telemitry provided by nasa rovers?


The european space agency has sent probes as well. And JAXA is currently planning a mission to be launched. And the Rusians hae sent multiple probes but everyone forgets about them now.
edit on 5/15/17 by dragonridr because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 15 2017 @ 10:25 AM
link   
a reply to: Tardacus

to me the moon is where i would be blasting my rockets from, am i wrong in thinking this?



posted on May, 15 2017 @ 10:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: Davg80
a reply to: Tardacus

to me the moon is where i would be blasting my rockets from, am i wrong in thinking this?


There are becoming economic reasons to return to the moon. These include minerals tourism and even military. But yes your right easier to build large spacecraft.
edit on 5/15/17 by dragonridr because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 15 2017 @ 10:42 AM
link   
Here's you're good ol NASA. Something about this post that this forum didn't like and decided to delete the thread..

ETA-I saw this formation about 2 weeks ago. Have the video also. 5th time spotted.






















So we have clear links to NASA (or the hidden hand behind it) and Nibiru/Planet X, which this formation is part of.

This/these I have named the St Schneider Formations, there are a few, this example is a more dominant cluster, also note the planet independent of the arrow formation, which btw also has planets within.

The trail (arrow formation) itself, is made by the bow shock wave of gasses and iron oxide released from Planet X, this envelops the whole system.


edit on 15-5-2017 by EndOfDays77 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 15 2017 @ 10:44 AM
link   
a reply to: anonentity

Man oh man oh man. Really!?! No, not really. The truth is they have never nor will ever go to mars.



new topics

top topics



 
14
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join