It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A federal judge may have just paved the way for Barack Obama AND Hillary Clinton to be put on trial for TREASON.
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson has ordered the State Department to turn over previously redacted information regarding what Obama and Clinton knew about and how they responded to the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi.
Both emails had the subject line “Quick Summary of POTUS Calls to Presidents of Libya and Egypt.” Jackson reviewed the documents and rejected the government’s contention that the records had been properly withheld under the Freedom of Information Act.
Both emails had the subject line “Quick Summary of POTUS Calls to Presidents of Libya and Egypt” and were among the emails stored on Clinton’s unofficial email server. Judge Jackson reviewed the documents directly and rejected the government’s contention that the records had been properly withheld under the FOIA B(5) “deliberative process” exemption.
Judicial Watch today announced that U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson has ordered the U.S. Department of State to turn over to Judicial Watch “eight identical paragraphs” of previously redacted material in two September 13, 2012, Hillary Clinton emails regarding phone calls made by President Barack Obama to Egyptian and Libyan leaders immediately following the terrorist attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi. Both emails had the subject line “Quick Summary of POTUS Calls to Presidents of Libya and Egypt” and were among the emails stored on Clinton’s unofficial email server. Judge Jackson reviewed the documents directly and rejected the government’s contention that the records had been properly withheld under the FOIA B(5) “deliberative process” exemption.
originally posted by: Noncents
a reply to: Vasa Croe
I want to believe this will become something more than words but has Judicial Watch ever been responsible for anything tangible? Not trying to troll, honest question.
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Hard core right wing website, also known as fake news in reference to their claims of treason. Did you read the name of the link? Likely, this is conservative backlash because of Trumps recent firing of Comey and hot water over Russia so like any good right winger, deflect immediately to Clinton/Obama.
originally posted by: Noncents
a reply to: Vasa Croe
I want to believe this will become something more than words but has Judicial Watch ever been responsible for anything tangible? Not trying to troll, honest question.
originally posted by: Deplorable
How casually Ambassador Stevens' death was dismissed by 'them'.
My heart goes out to the other fellas whose lives were lost when the Obama administration wrote them off. Even while our military was poised to intervene. I want to know who issued the stand-down orders.
originally posted by: RomeByFire
originally posted by: Noncents
a reply to: Vasa Croe
I want to believe this will become something more than words but has Judicial Watch ever been responsible for anything tangible? Not trying to troll, honest question.
Tangible? Of course not.
It seems to me many here aren't familiar with Judicial Watch.
I have to admit, it's entertaining how people think this is a "bombshell," of any magnitude.
Clearly, this is the first time they've heard of Judicial Watch lol.
They're your run of the mill "non-partisan," (they're partisan) blogs that operate thru click-bait headlines. Because clicks = revenue and revenue = $$$.
They're not the worst, but they claim to be something that they're most certainly not.
originally posted by: Noncents
a reply to: carewemust
Well that's something, I guess. After looking into them a bit it seems most of what they do gets ignored or their cases get thrown out. Oh well, maybe this time things will go differently but I'm not holding my breath.
originally posted by: SBMcG
originally posted by: Deplorable
How casually Ambassador Stevens' death was dismissed by 'them'.
My heart goes out to the other fellas whose lives were lost when the Obama administration wrote them off. Even while our military was poised to intervene. I want to know who issued the stand-down orders.
Steven's death has always bothered me. Almost like he was set up. Put in a place where the bad guys knew he would be...
originally posted by: RomeByFire
originally posted by: Noncents
a reply to: Vasa Croe
I want to believe this will become something more than words but has Judicial Watch ever been responsible for anything tangible? Not trying to troll, honest question.
Tangible? Of course not.
It seems to me many here aren't familiar with Judicial Watch.
I have to admit, it's entertaining how people think this is a "bombshell," of any magnitude.
Clearly, this is the first time they've heard of Judicial Watch lol.
They're your run of the mill "non-partisan," (they're partisan) blogs that operate thru click-bait headlines. Because clicks = revenue and revenue = $$$.
They're not the worst, but they claim to be something that they're most certainly not.