It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

9/11- Something just occurred to me...

page: 8
43
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 28 2017 @ 10:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Iconic
a reply to: Informer1958

missing at least a very good portion of the block!

Yea, keep telling yourself that.

Like it's hot enough to melt the engine block, but it didn't melt the steel body panels?

This pyroclastic flow is just so selective!

Aluminum and Magnesium parts will melt or burn in a vehicle fire, not steel engine blocks.

Your pyroclatic flow hypothesis makes me chuckle how you guys will defend it.




posted on Apr, 28 2017 @ 10:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: Iconic


missing at least a very good portion of the block!


Yes it is, what could melt an engine, yet leave the many of the burnt cars, and trucks bodies intact?

Again, engage your brain.

The answer is, are you ready for this?

NOTHING

Even your pyroclastic flow can't do that.

Are we going to go to directed energy weapons now?

Selectively targeting random vehicles for motor meltdowns?



posted on Apr, 28 2017 @ 10:46 PM
link   
There was not enough heat to make steel columns fail at the WTC, but there was heat to melt car engines? Right on fantasy fans.


So, what produced all the fantasy heat?

Where are all the burn victims if heat was radiating out from the WTC?

Where are all the other items with burnt off paint. Like signs and billboards? Overpasses? In addition to burnt trees, grass, plastic.....

All the theories for WTC are based on demolitions cuttings steel columns, what's with the intense heat theory? What caused the intense heat.

If there was heat emitting from the WTC that was melting car engines, then material within the WTC would be vaporized into superheated gas. If there was superheated gas, there would be a mushroom cloud above the WTC.
edit on 28-4-2017 by neutronflux because: Fixed this and that.

edit on 28-4-2017 by neutronflux because: Added overpasses



posted on Apr, 28 2017 @ 10:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

Can you present one of you "burnt engine" photos with the name of the photographer, the date the picture was taken, the place the photo was captured, if the photo had a caption, and what the caption was?

All I see are pictures out of context, with low resolution that hides details, and their authenticity is only based on hearsay.



posted on Apr, 28 2017 @ 11:04 PM
link   
Well there goes the thread!


So, what produced all the fantasy heat?




Your pyroclatic flow hypothesis makes me chuckle how you guys will defend it.


So, I am waiting for your evidence, besides your snide remarks, and "opinions" to prove me wrong. Where is your evidence that caused 1,400 cars, trucks, and buses to burn and in many photos specially the big parking lot away from the WTC?

You cannot have your OS of some office fires bringing down three WTC, and yet do this kind of strange phenomena to all these vehicles. This is unheard of.



posted on Apr, 28 2017 @ 11:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: D8Tee


The fire would have melted the radiator, thats about it.
Like really, hot enough and long enough to melt a iron engine block?
hahahahaa


You haven't proved anything here. Where in the photo of the burnt engine does it show the engine?

Look at the rest of the photos, specially the "rescue vehicle", where is that engin?

Nice try.

Obviously we cant see the engine, as it is behind the door.
Here, I'll post the pics again as you must have missed them the first time.




posted on Apr, 28 2017 @ 11:19 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee



Where is the engine in this vehicle did it just walk away?

Your approach is very juvenile.
edit on 28-4-2017 by Informer1958 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 28 2017 @ 11:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

What do you mean by burnt? Hit with smoldering ruble, ash, and combustion products?

Or a flash of heat able to instantly burn paint off metal?

If the burnt paint on the vehicles was solely due to radiated heat:

One, think of the intensity at the towers. If you double the distance from the source, intensity will diminish by a factor of four.

Two, why would only part of the paint be burnt off the fire truck? Why would there still be paint on the overpass in the one picture? Were the cars moved? Seems like the paint on the fire truck was only burnt off as hot combustion products hit the metal. If the metal didn't get hit by hot ash for example, then the paint didn't get burnt.



posted on Apr, 28 2017 @ 11:20 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee


You cannot have your OS of some office fires bringing down three WTC, and yet do this kind of strange phenomena to all these vehicles. This is unheard of.
Did you forget that two of the buildings were hit by aircraft, and the other was damaged by falling debris from the collapse of the tower?

Strange phenomena?

It's called fire.

It's happened before, I've seen other examples of this phenomena.



posted on Apr, 28 2017 @ 11:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: D8Tee


Where is the engine in this vehicle did it just walk away?


The picture is quite inconclusive.

What model car is it?

Do you think an engine block melts without the rest of the cars steel melting as well?

Are you arguing some kind of directed energy weapons were used?


edit on 28-4-2017 by D8Tee because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 28 2017 @ 11:23 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux


What do you mean by burnt? Hit with smoldering ruble, ash, and combustion products?

Or a flash of heat able to instantly burn paint off metal?

If the burnt paint on the vehicles was solely due to radiated heat:


I not here to play sick games with you.


PERMANENTLY IGNORED:
edit on 28-4-2017 by Informer1958 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 28 2017 @ 11:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: Informer1958

Where is the engine in this vehicle did it just walk away?

Your approach is very juvenile.


Are you talking about the white car? Like a heavy load is pushing down the bare rims and the broken suspension?

Can you cite who took the picture, when, and where.

If the engine is missing? How did the more massive engine melt and leave the thin sheet metal with more surface area to react? What process would do that?

edit on 28-4-2017 by neutronflux because: Quotes were messed up



posted on Apr, 28 2017 @ 11:29 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee


The picture is quite inconclusive.

What model car is it?


I see, I don't see game. Good luck convincing everyone that this is a normal thing, when building fall down and not on the vehicles. I have no problems with anyone disagreeing with me, I like it in fact and welcome a good challenge.

However you cannot give me a credibal challenge but insult my intelligence and ad hom attacks.

Good day to you.



posted on Apr, 28 2017 @ 11:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

Look, I proved your silly claim of a melted engine block in the fire truck false.

Now you show a picture taken from afar of a small car with no hood and expect people to believe that the engine is melted out of it?

Give it up already and admit that you are wrong.



posted on Apr, 28 2017 @ 11:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

Enjoy!

Debunked: 9/11 Melted Cars Near WTC 7
www.metabunk.org...



posted on Apr, 28 2017 @ 11:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

Just asking you to describe the process that melts a more massive engine block but leaves thin sheet metal intact and undistorted?

Or the process that burns only part of the paint off a fire truck? Like the paint was more sandblasted than burnt?



posted on Apr, 29 2017 @ 12:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: D8Tee
Your approach is very juvenile.


Informer, you reap what you sow.
edit on 29-4-2017 by D8Tee because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 29 2017 @ 12:18 AM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

Did you point out the rubber on the wheel of the fire truck looks reasonably unmelted?



posted on Apr, 29 2017 @ 12:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: D8Tee

Did you point out the rubber on the wheel of the fire truck looks reasonably unmelted?

The member will somehow still manage to convince himself that the engine block has melted out of that cabover unit.



posted on Apr, 29 2017 @ 12:45 AM
link   
9/11 was an inside job. Doesnt mean George W was flying the planes. Hired hands given just what was needed and nothing more. But who cares about pointless details. Why are you people talking pointless details. You dont need to prove it to ostrich folk and other delusional deniers.

The significance of this chosen date, ixxi, does not lie in Islamic belief systems. I wonder what its significance was, and to whom?



edit on 29-4-2017 by BigBangWasAnEcho because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
43
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join