It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Would a nuclear exchange with Russia necessary mean armageddon

page: 4
5
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 8 2017 @ 09:46 AM
link   
a reply to: BASSPLYR

good luck having people trying to understand up and down spins...

there are probably 3-7 people on ATS that know
edit on 8-4-2017 by penroc3 because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 8 2017 @ 10:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: penroc3
a reply to: BASSPLYR

good luck having people trying to understand up and down spins...

there are probably 3-7 people on ATS that know


😈😈😈



posted on Apr, 8 2017 @ 11:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Golantrevize

Depends on how many are used, and how big megaton wise. It took decades, but Japan came back, despite Hiroshima and Nagasaki.



posted on Apr, 8 2017 @ 11:14 AM
link   
a reply to: UnBreakable

Theres a way to leave zero radiation and immediatly after the strike.

Theres a way to leave zero evidence as to where the strike originated from, although it should be obvious which nation is the only one with the ability to pull of such miraculous destruction.

Theres a way to give zero warning time before the strike. Its just everythings fine once second the next BOOM!!!!! Would you look at that they spontaneously combusted.



posted on Apr, 8 2017 @ 11:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
a reply to: UnBreakable

Theres a way to leave zero radiation and immediatly after the strike.

Theres a way to leave zero evidence as to where the strike originated from, although it should be obvious which nation is the only one with the ability to pull of such miraculous destruction.

Theres a way to give zero warning time before the strike. Its just everythings fine once second the next BOOM!!!!! Would you look at that they spontaneously combusted.


A single Trident missile fired from a nuclear sub 80 miles off the coast of NJ, aimed at Manhattan, won't kill anybody in Oregon, just sayin'.
edit on 4jY by UnBreakable because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 8 2017 @ 11:40 AM
link   
a reply to: UnBreakable

Oh this thing has a dialable yeild. You can simply give enemy soldiers an uncomfortable feeling and get them sick so they vacate an area.

Can kill all life but leave all infrastructure standing perfectly fine.

Or. You can set it to OMFG and level cities in an instant to the bedrock and then keep going.


But youll never leave any radiation.

I also believe that this weapon may even be able to penetrate bedrock and take out nuclear proof bunkers but not leave much evidence on the surface depending on which frequency they choose to do the observation on.



posted on May, 23 2017 @ 01:05 PM
link   
a reply to: TrueBrit

Agreed but with one reservation. The money behind all of it comes from the central bank. It has been that way for decades, perhaps longer. Although, the central banks are controlled by the same select few you are referencing. See how it comes full circle?
Bad things happen to leaders who want to remove central banks from their respective countries. Hitler, Gaddafi and Sadam to name just a few.



posted on May, 24 2017 @ 04:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Golantrevize

Read this wicki page, there is a section with link's to other wiki pages detailing a collection of doomsday scenario's.
en.wikipedia.org...



posted on May, 24 2017 @ 05:52 PM
link   
You have to launch everything you got to be sure you do not lose the ability to respond.



new topics

top topics



 
5
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join