It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dawnstar
have a question about the "burkas" though, which by what I read extends over to headscarves..
so, let's say you have an employee who just had surgery that required a good bit of hair to be shaved off, is anyone going to enforce a ban on head scarves on her, really? I kind of think that if they did, they might find that a number of female employees would be having a head shaving party after work in solidarity for the person or something.. but if an exception was made for her, then one would have to ask, why would her need to be able to wear be deemed more worthy than another person's freedom to practice their religion? a head scarf is a head scarf, and they come in many forms by the way.
originally posted by: dawnstar
have a question about the "burkas" though, which by what I read extends over to headscarves..
So, let's say you have an employee who just had surgery that required a good bit of hair to be shaved off, is anyone going to enforce a ban on head scarves on her, really?
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: schuyler
By oppressing the rights of a person to express themselves to force inclusion? Inclusion into what? A society molded in some bureaucrat's preferred image?
Can you even force people to be included? Is that the right way to go about it? Will people thank you for being forced to be included?
originally posted by: watchitburn
Interesting.
This isn't really in keeping with the all inclusive pro Muslim immigration policies the EU has been pushing.
I wonder what the underlying goal is here.