It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Zaphod has proven he is an aviation expert, I have seen no evidence from you that indicates the level of knowledge he possess on aviation related matters.
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: neutronflux
You do not fully appreciate the finer points of brain surgery, and neither do I.
You do not fully appreciate the finer points of aviation, but I do.
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: neutronflux
(He thinks that as soon as you hit Vmo, the airplane falls apart)
originally posted by: Pilgrum
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: neutronflux
(He thinks that as soon as you hit Vmo, the airplane falls apart)
Isn't this a little confusion over Vmo and Vne?
The plane doesn't necessarily disintegrate at Vne either for that matter but it's likely to cause damage. I doubt the integrity of the plane or warranty conditions were a concern for the pilot of AAL77.
What proof is there that you have this 'finer appreciation of aviation'?
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: neutronflux
You do not fully appreciate the finer points of brain surgery, and neither do I.
You do not fully appreciate the finer points of aviation, but I do.
originally posted by: Boone 870
Sorry, I haven't had a chance to read through the entire thread yet, but here is a link to a transcript from the interview the C-130 pilot gave 9/11 commission staffers. Just in case the OP is still interested it hasn't been linked to yet.
www.oredigger61.org...
originally posted by: [post=22111394]Salander
I want neutral parties to examine that debris, compare part numbers and such (I worked in aircraft manufacturing for a number of years and know how that part works), and get a positive ID on what those parts were.
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: neutronflux
I want neutral parties to examine that debris, compare part numbers and such (I worked in aircraft manufacturing for a number of years and know how that part works), and get a positive ID on what those parts were.
That won't happen because the government keeps everything secret and away from the public view. There is a reason for the government doing that--it has something to hide.
originally posted by: MrBig2430
originally posted by: [post=22111394]Salander
I want neutral parties to examine that debris, compare part numbers and such (I worked in aircraft manufacturing for a number of years and know how that part works), and get a positive ID on what those parts were.
This is equally as stupid a request as the call to "see the 85 videos."
Here's why- there can be only 2 scenarios.
1- you are right, and there was a guv conspiracy regarding 9/11. But the evidence is in possession of the guv, and if they choose to give your "neutral third party" access to it, they will provide whatever they want to make their lies seem true.
2- you are wrong, and they will provide what they have, which would be the exact same evidence that they would provide if they are lying.
Are the believers in the crazy guv conspiracy theory so infantile to actually believe that if they ask, the guv will incriminate themselves? Cuz this is what you are in effect saying.
In actuality, rather than being such devout cynics in everything and everybody involved with the guv, your only hope for finding proof of your crazy alternative scenario is to believe in the goodness of the involved individuals in the investigations - the grunt FBI agent that was at Fresh Kills, the 1st year kid scientist at the morgue identifying DNA, the career firefighter at the Pentagon that saw bodies strapped to airplane seats, the career firefighter at the WTC that had his son or brother die in the collapses, etc, and hope that they come forward with unassailable proof that the so called OS is a lie.
All you're doing is bayonetting a scarecrow..... www.monbiot.com...
originally posted by: Salander
I like that imagery, bayonetting a scarecrow.
And as much studying as I did then, I just found out the other day that the evidence is quite clear that in the case of the north tower, the tower itself had been prepared for the CD. Bolts removed and other preparation.
.
Where's your evidence?
And as much studying as I did then, I just found out the other day that the evidence is quite clear that in the case of the north tower, the tower itself had been prepared for the CD. Bolts removed and other preparation.