It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Clownface
hmm planeman interesting pic.. But the angle on the plane looks weird.. I'd say it's taking off in the direction of 2 o clock from where the photo is taken. And if you look at the cargoplane and runway it should be taking off in a more 3 o clock direction. You get my thought? Or maybe it's not taking off like I think it is?
Originally posted by planeman
Anyway, Waynos, if you’re volunteering to go undercover in Iran or China with zoom lenses to take high resolution close-up pictures of restricted aircraft projects, good luck. People seem keen to question the photos I bring to the table yet they buy those high res CGI ones. I don’t know why I bother.
Emile, what have your photos of age-old Russian experimental aircraft got to do with the Jxx?????? I assume you realize that the first is just a re-engined Mig 23 Flogger and the latter the T-58 Prototype for the Su 15 Flagon program? What is their relevance or are they not?
Daedalus3,
That pic is a CGI, no doubt about it –been around a while. It’s good though, but note that the canard cuts of an access panel. But pretty picture all the same. Real first pictures tend to be less sexy.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
nothing is taking off anywhere in that pic!
very interesting and astonishing if those pics are real!
More research is required.
Planeman/CNAFUNs pics are truly intriguing..
especially this one:
seems legit enough to me..
Which other iranian pic you talking about Waynos?
[edit on 1-12-2005 by Daedalus3]
Originally posted by grunt2
AMM, that pic have more relation with the 1.44 proyect, or an "stealthed 144"
Originally posted by waynos
Originally posted by planeman
Emile, what have your photos of age-old Russian experimental aircraft got to do with the Jxx?????? I assume you realize that the first is just a re-engined Mig 23 Flogger and the latter the T-58 Prototype for the Su 15 Flagon program? What is their relevance or are they not?
Actually I think he was proving to the other guy that the plane in your picture was not actually taking off because of the similar ground angle of the two he posted.
Originally posted by American Mad Man
This pic is a fake and has been proven to be so on this site. It is a CG artists rendering.
If you look at it, you will notice a lot in common with the YF-23.
Originally posted by Harlequin
Originally posted by American Mad Man
This pic is a fake and has been proven to be so on this site. It is a CG artists rendering.
If you look at it, you will notice a lot in common with the YF-23.
Just because it might `look` like a YF-23 doesn`t in anyway shap or form make it a `fake`
Originally posted by planeman
Emile, sorry for my abruptness.
The Foxbat suggestion is a good one, I agree with the passing resemblance. But when you look closely, like my associate did, you find several key differences which rule out the Foxbat:
1- The tail fins are canted outwards much more
2- The engines appear slightly wider apart
3- The wing is too low compared to the fuselage
4- No tailplane visible
5- What appears to be canards forward of the wing
But I can see where you were coming from.