It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump's closest advisor Steve Bannon suggests war with China is inevitable

page: 5
12
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 05:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mousygretchen
a reply to: WhateverYouSay


Banon is the new Lenin.


I agree, I'm certain he will soon show his musical talent and fire up a band called the caterpillars.
Can't wait.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 05:47 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee


xD you turned that around like a U turn.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 05:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Soloprotocol

originally posted by: TheScale

originally posted by: Soloprotocol

originally posted by: MakeAmericaSaneAgain
But that b!tch Hillary will lead us into world war 3!!!!!


By losing to Trump she probably has...lol


well whats worse. pissing off russia while bowing down to china like the clintons have done since bill was in office, or having trump who is willing to deescalate with russia while not bowing and scraping for china? ill take the latter myself

There's 2 billion reasons you dont piss off China.


its around 1.4 billion but even so whats better, wait till they have the technological edge and the population advantage or go at it prior to them getting the technological advantage? if we wait and dont do anything then we know they are going to go into the surrounding countries and invade them for their natural resources. we are seeing the military buildup right now along with their posturing. in the end its a crappy situation all around. i dont want to see war but china is gearing up for it. i also dont want to see the surrounding countries that have no chance of defending themselves to be slaughtered either. china is the elephant in the room and it will have to be dealt with at some point or we just roll over and salute our chinese overlords.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 05:57 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

Hey i simply suggested a Poll nothing violent about that.


Have to face facts buddy the rest of the world(Or a significant percentage of such) is rather ambivalent regarding Mr Trump intent.

As to idiots promoting violence online and on the streets, it wont solve jack crap.
edit on 3-2-2017 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 06:03 PM
link   
A naval blockade is the way to force an Asian Empire to declare War on the US.

It worked the last time.

Crash the Chinese economy and cancel the debt once the War starts.

Let them try to find their resources in Siberia.

An invasion they might have planned.

Ten minutes later Uncle Vlad will push the button.




posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 06:03 PM
link   
You are making sense but the OP is not

a reply to: Zanti Misfit



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 06:04 PM
link   
a reply to: draoicht


We could always just place tariffs on fortune cookies.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 06:09 PM
link   
a reply to: WhateverYouSay

Bannon is Trumps Martin Bormann



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 06:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: WhateverYouSay

Bannon is Trumps Martin Bormann


Who is Speers?
We know who Spicer is.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 06:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: D8Tee

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: WhateverYouSay

Bannon is Trumps Martin Bormann


Who is Speers?
We know who Spicer is.


You mean Albert Speer Hitler’s architect.


Good question



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 06:23 PM
link   
a reply to: draoicht

Only if he wishes his own nation to glow in the dark for the next few thousand years hence his ambivalence to do so i imagine.

Full scale nuclear conflict will never happen, stands to reason and if nothing else the lack of control any such event would orchestrate.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 06:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Willtell

originally posted by: D8Tee

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: WhateverYouSay

Bannon is Trumps Martin Bormann


Who is Speers?
We know who Spicer is.


You mean Albert Speer Hitler’s architect.


Good question


Yes.
Who did he put in charge of building the wall?
Whoever that is should fit the bill.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 06:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: draoicht
A naval blockade is the way to force an Asian Empire to declare War on the US.

It worked the last time.

Crash the Chinese economy and cancel the debt once the War starts.

Let them try to find their resources in Siberia.

An invasion they might have planned.

Ten minutes later Uncle Vlad will push the button.




yes even russia suspects they will they will eventually invade. Its going to start with there claim to the area much like the China sea. Putin isnt stupid hes all ready taking steps to prevent it. they are trying to increase Russian immigration to the area since China all most has a majority. And then China moves on to korea and japan they need the resources and building a military to take it.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 11:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheScale

originally posted by: Soloprotocol

originally posted by: TheScale

originally posted by: Soloprotocol

originally posted by: MakeAmericaSaneAgain
But that b!tch Hillary will lead us into world war 3!!!!!


By losing to Trump she probably has...lol


well whats worse. pissing off russia while bowing down to china like the clintons have done since bill was in office, or having trump who is willing to deescalate with russia while not bowing and scraping for china? ill take the latter myself

There's 2 billion reasons you dont piss off China.


if we wait and dont do anything then we know they are going to go into the surrounding countries and invade them for their natural resources.

You do understand Irony, right?



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 12:28 AM
link   
a reply to: Soloprotocol


The whole world is obviously going into an economic crisis. You have Texas Nevada and Utah passing legislation to organise a state repository for Gold and Silver, which will make real money exist in solid form. If their is no Fed then their is no federal deficit. Then you could very well have States called the American alliance or some such thing. The rich Globalists would suddenly realise that because of the Globalisation of the Debt, then the EEC will no longer exist in its present form. With no debt, America would do quite well trading between States, because its essentially a self sufficient region. I don't think Soros would like it much, but the options are decreasing.



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 12:29 AM
link   
a reply to: anonentity


You have Texas Nevada and Utah passing legislation to organise a state repository for Gold and Silver, which will make real money exist in solid form.

Source?



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 12:40 AM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

Pick one
www.google.com...



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 12:46 AM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee



www.youtube.com... 11.28 in the discourse unless you want to be bored with real job numbers.



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 02:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: D8Tee

Pick one
www.google.com...


Your link confused me. Gold repository, depository?

Perhaps the word you were looking for was suppository.



posted on Feb, 4 2017 @ 03:20 AM
link   
a reply to: WhateverYouSay


It would appear on the face of the 20 trillion debt, that the U.S.A is basically, going to have to do a "Soviet Union " and reinvent itself. Some States seem to be anticipating this eventuality and are securing a State/Country precious metal repository. So that in the dire eventuality, of a Federal monetary collapse that they will have an alternative in place to continue trading. Correct me if I am wrong.




top topics



 
12
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join