It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump's closest advisor Steve Bannon suggests war with China is inevitable

page: 2
12
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:01 AM
link   
a reply to: NeuronDivide

Anyone who wants to start a war should be the frontline themself




posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:06 AM
link   
"Let China Sleep, for when the Dragon awakes, she will shake the world."

~ Napoleon Bonaparte



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:09 AM
link   
a reply to: Kryties

"I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve."

-Isoroku Yamamoto
edit on 3-2-2017 by JinMI because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Kryties

"I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve."

-Isoroku Yamamoto


Yamamoto was Japanese, not Chinese.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:18 AM
link   
a reply to: Kryties

Obviously. Napoleon was French.

I would expect a China/US conflict would make some very wealth people much more wealthy.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Kryties

Obviously. Napoleon was French.

I would expect a China/US conflict would make some very wealth people much more wealthy.


It would also destroy the planet.

War with China will NOT go well.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:22 AM
link   
a reply to: Kryties

I would argue that it depends upon the motive...the real motive.

If it were all out war then yes, I would agree.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Kryties

I would argue that it depends upon the motive...the real motive.

If it were all out war then yes, I would agree.


China has said, in no uncertain terms, that messing with the South China Sea will lead to all-out war. And they meant it.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: WhateverYouSay


Steve Bannon from March 2016:

We’re going to war in the South China Sea in five to 10 years



We’re clearly going into, I think, a major shooting war in the Middle East again




Funny how they never say why they see war as inevitable.

Funny how they say they never say that want to establish diplomatic relations with xyz country or state whatever, for the purposes of discussing and resolving this, this and this issue.

We can see from this that forecasting war from a long way out, that they are actually expressing their Intent for war not their intent to avoid war.

By doing what they are doing here, which they do all the time, we can see they are conditioning the public to the war they want so they will have the necessary public support when the time comes.

They are conditioning the public to the inevitability and therefore expection of war in the future.

its simply same narrative, different face.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:33 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

because the Russia VS U.S. lies that the MSM was spewing last month didn`t take.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:35 AM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

Guns and bombs dont have motives. Dead is dead, destroyed is destroyed. The why and the how of it all are rather meaningless to the dead or their communities.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:35 AM
link   
a reply to: WhateverYouSay

Would be no great surprise if there is war with China.
I'm sure there are lots in this administration and previous administrations that have a use it or lose it mentality with regards to the military advantage the US has right now.

If you listen closely to Bannon in the broadcast it's apparent he is framing the 'we're going to war with China' as a question.
He says, are we.....



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 02:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Leonidas

I'm sure those that push for war without having to step foot on the battlefield are well aware.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 03:08 AM
link   
Inevitable war. Just what the people want.Bravo President Tiny hands.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 04:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: Kryties

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Kryties

I would argue that it depends upon the motive...the real motive.

If it were all out war then yes, I would agree.


China has said, in no uncertain terms, that messing with the South China Sea will lead to all-out war. And they meant it.



Lotta good the SC Sea will be after the all out war.




posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 04:26 AM
link   
I dont want to see war with china.....


But China cant just sieze parts of the ocean and claim it is theres.......

And China do just need to STFU with Taiwan....honestly they are like a dumped pycho girlfriend who cant accept it is over.

If the USA starts the war with China I would be 100% against it.

If China start it.....well the USA needs to finnish it and I would not be oppossed to the UK helping (providing we get Hong Kong back
:lol
.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 04:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Kryties


The Philippine president has just asked the Chinese
to patrol around the Philippines to clear out the Pirates, hardly an aggressive China.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 04:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: Kryties

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Kryties

Obviously. Napoleon was French.

I would expect a China/US conflict would make some very wealth people much more wealthy.


It would also destroy the planet.

War with China will NOT go well.


China have a no nuke first policy.

Providing the USA dont do something retarded like use a nuclear weapons first, in theory any war would be kept conventional.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 04:36 AM
link   
a reply to: WhateverYouSay

Cant see why considering the Chinese, who would inevitability field far superior numbers, still don't have the capability of mounting any full scale invasion of the USA.

Maybe what he meant to say is that a US invasion/incursion on to Chinese foreign soil is an inevitability?



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 04:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: WhateverYouSay

Cant see why considering the Chinese, who would inevitability field far superior numbers, still don't have the capability of mounting any full scale invasion of the USA.

Maybe what he meant to say is that a US invasion/incursion on to Chinese foreign soil is an inevitability?


well one reason is that even with those numbers there is a large gun owning population in the US. so lets say half the us population has some guns thats 160 million armed people they would have to control.







 
12
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join