Federal Judge Just Issued a Stay Against Donald Trump's "Muslim Ban"

Who started the ban? people keeps forgetting, Obama was the one that started the ban, under the Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015

I guess Trump was the president back then too.

a reply to: marg6043


thanks for the clear statement of fact


ATS, here's a source that will keep you up-to-date on most of the changing dialog on the BAN = PAUSE

www.governmentpropaganda.net...

I just became aware of the Alt-media news site myself, lets discover & rate together

President Trump Responds to Immigration Order Protests in New Statement

Here is the full statement released by the White House on Sunday afternoon:

“America is a proud nation of immigrants and we will continue to show compassion to those fleeing oppression, but we will do so while protecting our own citizens and border. America has always been the land of the free and home of the brave. We will keep it free and keep it safe, as the media knows, but refuses to say. My policy is similar to what President Obama did in 2011 when he banned visas for refugees from Iraq for six months. The seven countries named in the Executive Order are the same countries previously identified by the Obama administration as sources of terror. To be clear, this is not a Muslim ban, as the media is falsely reporting. This is not about religion – this is about terror and keeping our country safe. There are over 40 different countries worldwide that are majority Muslim that are not affected by this order. We will again be issuing visas to all countries once we are sure we have reviewed and implemented the most secure policies over the next 90 days. I have tremendous feeling for the people involved in this horrific humanitarian crisis in Syria. My first priority will always be to protect and serve our country, but as President I will find ways to help all those who are suffering.”

a reply to: St Udio

I read the headlines on the site, the one that got me the most, is Muslim taxis drivers go on strike

Hell that is what happen when foreigners become activist in our own soil and want to play politics.

People be warned, this is how a country is been changed from within to change the face of America, believes, values and traditions.

Then those misinformed think that electoral college is a bad idea, hell thank god that certain areas in the country do not take hold of the white house.

The warnings will go unheard as usual by those the misinformed.

a reply to: BlueAjah

That is great post, the truth be known, the media frenzy and the Democrats are spinning the news.

We know that, but is always those that wants to get their panties in a bunch and use propaganda crap.

Because that is the agenda.

Obama started the ban no Trump. but the media is not going to tell that.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: St Udio

I read the headlines on the site, the one that got me the most, is Muslim taxis drivers go on strike

Hell that is what happen when foreigners become activist in our own soil and want to play politics.

How do you know they're foreigners? There are a lot of multi-generational Muslims here in America. There are mosques in America that are over 80 years old And the Black (African-American) Nation of Islam group was founded in 1930.

How do you know that the Muslim taxi drivers are NOT Americans?

a reply to: Byrd

No going to debate you Byrd, I would not.

But I will tell you this much, just because a person becomes an American citizen doesn't necessarily makes them somebody that respect Americas values, the constitution or that accept our way of life.

That to me makes them a foreign activist that happen to have an American citizenship.

Muslims going on strike like the article I read said, and or protesting at the airport, like the news has been parading, because the temporary ban on none citizens coming into the country have been misinformed about what is behind the ban, the meaning of the presidential EO and the already established laws in our country regarding immigration that Obama himself created.

a reply to: marg6043

Obama Invites 18.7 Million Immigrants to Avoid Oath of Allegiance, Pledge to Defend America

It’s not only illegal aliens who are escaping enforcement of the nation’s immigration laws.

Under the Obama administration’s expansive interpretation of executive authority, legal immigrants seeking citizenship through the nation’s Naturalization process are now exempt from a key part of the Oath of Allegiance.

Immigrants seeking to become citizens no longer have to pledge to “bear arms on behalf of the United States.” They can opt out of that part of the Oath. Nor do they have to cite any specific religious belief that forbids them to perform military service.

According to the Naturalization Fact Sheet on the US Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) website, In the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015, the nation welcomed 729,995 Legal Permanent Residents into full citizenship.

Over the past decade 6.6 million have been naturalized through a process that ends with the Oath of Allegiance.
In the decade 1980-1990, the average number completing Naturalization was only 220,000 annually, but from 1990 to 2000 that number jumped to over 500,000 annually.
1,050,399 new citizens were welcomed in the year 2008.
18.7 million immigrants are eligible to eventually become citizens, and 8.8 million already meet the 5-year residency requirement.

The pledge to help defend America was good enough for the 6.6 million immigrants naturalized since 2005 and good enough for the over 15 million naturalized since 1980, but Obama’s appointees at the USCIS think that is too much to ask of the 18.7 million estimated legal immigrants eligible today for eventual naturalization or the 750,000 who will be naturalized in the coming year.

This radical change was announced a year ago, in July of 2015. Congress did not enact the change in new legislation. There was no congressional debate, no filibuster in the US Senate, and no sit-in in the House to demand that a bill to repeal the USCIS action be brought to a vote.

No, this radical change was implemented while Congress slept. Like other Obama actions to undermine our immigration laws, the Republican-controlled Congress has not used its constitutional powers to reverse the administrative action. Thank God many states are stepping up to fill that void.

click link for entire article...

a reply to: Xcathdra

Then when you question how much a foreigners takes Americas values at hart is view as obscene.

That amount of new citizens, that have not loyalties toward Americas values or traditions become what I call foreign activist.

I think Obama knew very well what he was doing, he knew that eventually those foreign new American citizens will be enough in numbers to influence politics. loving your country and trying to protect it from foreign influences is been deemed dirty and offensive.

But that is my personal opinion.

a reply to: marg6043

I think the more appropriate title would be subversives.

a reply to: marg6043

OK but why are you going back there when the issue is now? This current action is by Trump!

a reply to: soficrow


Judge Donnelly? Now she does understand that known card holding active members of the IRA, if a person were so known, were not allowed in the US and still may not be

As far as political new persons screwing up the state department......its often a tactic, a disruption, has a cleansing effect even if it look like a clusterf**k. As well these old guys that lost their jobs couldn't be counted on to serve anything but their own agendas.