It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bobaganoosh
They can't stop here.... This is back country...
SNIP
]
originally posted by: ColaTesla
I recommend anyone who opposes this should be deported to Aleppo.
If you want islam you can have as much of it as you like over there.....
originally posted by: AboveBoard
originally posted by: ColaTesla
I recommend anyone who opposes this should be deported to Aleppo.
If you want islam you can have as much of it as you like over there.....
Welcome to Auchwitz? I mean Aleppo? - Well it was liberals that funded and paid for the situation in Aleppo, So it's doubly fitting if they got to experience the fruits of their labour.
Not agreeing with Dear Leader is basis for deportation to a war zone?? Someone needs to clean up the mess you voted for and created, if only there was some kind of final solution to fix it once and for all...
If that was the law, where would you have been sent during the last Presidency? in the UK where i live.
Sheesh
As a result of the Kentucky case, the State Department stopped processing Iraq refugees for six months in 2011, federal officials told ABC News – even for many who had heroically helped U.S. forces as interpreters and intelligence assets. One Iraqi who had aided American troops was assassinated before his refugee application could be processed, because of the immigration delays, two U.S. officials said. In 2011, fewer than 10,000 Iraqis were resettled as refugees in the U.S., half the number from the year before, State Department statistics show.
White House documents also show that former President Bill Clinton issued six immigrant bans; George W. Bush six immigrant bans; and former President Ronald Reagan four. And in 1980, former President Jimmy Carter banned Iranians after Tehran seized the U.S. embassy.
Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 states: “Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”
Federal agents are reinvestigating the backgrounds of dozens of Syrian refugees already in the United States after discovering a lapse in vetting that allowed some who had potentially negative information in their files to enter the country, two U.S. law enforcement officials said.
Agents have not concluded that any of the refugees should have been rejected for entry, but the apparent glitch — which was discovered in late 2015 and corrected last year — prevented U.S. officials who conducted background checks on the refugees from learning about possible “derogatory” information about them, the two officials said. At a minimum, the intelligence would have triggered further investigation that could have led some asylum applications to be rejected.
The refugees whose cases are under review include one who failed a polygraph test when he applied to work at a U.S. military installation overseas and another who may have been in communication with an Islamic State leader, according to the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter.
Refugee applications have been rescreened before. In 2011, the files of more than 58,000 Iraqi refugees already living in the U.S. were vetted after the FBI learned that an Iraqi man living in Kentucky had participated in roadside bomb attacks in Iraq before he was granted asylum. He and another Iraqi refugee were arrested by the FBI and pleaded guilty in 2013 to trying to send explosives and missiles to the group known as Al Qaeda in Iraq.
I see no problem with those countries as they were all countries that the US has bombed
originally posted by: AboveBoard
originally posted by: ColaTesla
I recommend anyone who opposes this should be deported to Aleppo.
If you want islam you can have as much of it as you like over there.....
Welcome to Auchwitz? I mean Aleppo?
Not agreeing with Dear Leader is basis for deportation to a war zone??
If that was the law, where would you have been sent during the last Presidency?
Sheesh
originally posted by: Stevemagegod
originally posted by: muse7
originally posted by: ColaTesla
I recommend anyone who opposes this should be deported to Aleppo.
If you want islam you can have as much of it as you like over there.....
That'll happen as soon as Trump supporters start laying bricks and build that wall and PAY FOR IT.
It won't be Trump Supporters. It'll be people working for a Construction Company working long hard hours not on welfare.
originally posted by: Stevemagegod
originally posted by: twfau
"Whenever there is a declared war..."
There is no declared war with Iran as far as I know. Give it a few months though.
Iran capturing are Soldiers was a Declaration of War.
originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: Stevemagegod
Are we "at war" with any of the countries on the Muslim ban list?
No.
I see no problem with those countries as they were all countries that the US has bombed
So, because we bombed them at one time, that makes it ok?
What kind of logic are you smoking?
originally posted by: Liquesence
originally posted by: Stevemagegod
originally posted by: twfau
"Whenever there is a declared war..."
There is no declared war with Iran as far as I know. Give it a few months though.
Iran capturing are Soldiers was a Declaration of War.
What are you talking about? If you're talking about last year's naval incident, you keep bringing up this FALSE information in your threads even after being called out. The US navy was IN Iranian navigational waters. They were detained. That is NOT an act of war by Iran.
Yet you keep repeating the same BS as if it were true.
PS: it's "our" not "are."
General Sharif said the sailors were being held under good conditions and treated with “Islamic compassion.”
But Kerry’s words, measured and reasonable as they were, could not erase the sense of humiliation that seemed to be overtaking America with the release of the videos and photos that showed American soldiers sitting on the deck of their boats with their hands over their heads and their eyes darting from side to side in fear and apprehension. The images sparked outrage on the right, discomfort on the left and great embarrassment in the Obama administration: they, rather than Kerry’s statements, will forever define the affair. read more: www.haaretz.com...
inflamed Muslims throughout the word and entrenched the U.S. as their mortal enemy. read more: www.haaretz.com...
originally posted by: neo96
There has been a declaration of war since the Carter administration.
From the embassy bombings, to students being taken hostage to airliners being blown out of the sky.
From Marine barracks to more embassy bombings to the First World Trade Center attack to the USS cole.
To 9-11 and the Pentagon to San Berndino,Orlando, and the Boston Marathon Bombing.
The Enemy that has declared WAR and has waged one on the west in Ameirca and all over the globe for the last 40 years.