It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Kremlin says Washington must prove hacking accusations or shut up

page: 1
50
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:
+28 more 
posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 07:11 PM
link   
All this embarrassing nonsense from the DNC and Obama. They just have to give up. Drop it. You won't be able to steal the election. Nobody supports you. The military, police etc. definitely don't support the DNC. I guess Obama is just doing his job of injuring the United States for the globalists.


The Kremlin said on Friday that the United States should either prove accusations that Russia interfered in the U.S. presidential election by hacking Democratic Party organizations or drop the issue. "Either stop talking about it or finally provide some evidence. Otherwise it looks indecent," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters in Tokyo. Russia has repeatedly denied the hacking allegations. Futile and silly


Prove it Obama


Julian Assange always said Russian hackers were not his source for the emails that took down Hillary. He has never wavered, never changed his statement.


Assange (no Russians)




posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 07:15 PM
link   
The American MSM vs. the Kremlin.

Two giants of mass manipulation both "calling each other out."

This is laughable. Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction but this entire debacle reads like a bad 90's action movie.

I agree with the put up or shut up, for what it's worth. I just also think what the Kremlin is doing is classic pot calling the kettle black.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 07:19 PM
link   
a reply to: Doctor Smith

I'm sure that the Kremlin is just itching to learn the extent of our counter-cyber security abilities by way of "providing proof" of its hacking.

Did you ever stop to think that by providing this "proof" that we would also be exposing the extent and failure-points of our security?

Or is that form of treason acceptable to you?


+3 more 
posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 07:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Bhadhidar

Moving the goal posts.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 07:22 PM
link   
Censorship!!!


+23 more 
posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 07:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Bhadhidar

Failure point #1. A Secretary of State that totally ignores opSec protocols.
Our Solution: Lie and cheat to make her the Democratic Party nominee for president of the United States.

The Kremlin has likely been sitting watching this all unfold on TV, eating popcorn, drinking vodka, and laughing their asses off.

This current administration is wholly to blame for all of this crap. They did nothing to stop it, in fact they told those working to protect this country to stand down....and made fun of people that brought this potential to light.

We need leadership in this country. And if President-Elect Trump can do that, great. If not, then we have another 4 years of disappointment to find someone that will lead us into the future. What I do know is that the last name of that person is not Clinton.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 07:44 PM
link   
Excellent! We will see the real proof soon... but it will exonerate Russia! Nice move, and it will help put the curent administration out to pasture



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 07:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Krakatoa

Failure point #1, in reality, an electorate so apathetic that less than half of it can articulate the changes that they require to make their government functional, an electorate that is more concerned about partisan pissing contests than participating in their government, to the extent that most of us can only relate to the responsibility of governance as if it were some kind if TV reality game show.

Is it any wonder why a bombast wins over a wonk?

We have ourselves to blame for the crooks and fools we elect because we, ourselves, are crooks and fools

So much so that we have come to distrust anyone who even appears to be neither!
edit on 16-12-2016 by Bhadhidar because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:22 PM
link   


Kremlin says Washington must prove hacking accusations or shut up


Yeah well, Kremlin can prove they didn't or STFU.

Whatever.



+22 more 
posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Dan00

The burden of proof is always on the one that makes a claim



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dan00


Kremlin says Washington must prove hacking accusations or shut up


Yeah well, Kremlin can prove they didn't or STFU.

Whatever.



They can just show them their real capabilities of hacking. That will shut the government up.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Indigent
a reply to: Dan00

The burden of proof is always on the one that makes a claim

Agreed. It's up to Obama, etc to back up their claims. And if they prove them to be true, it's up to the rest of America to decry the attack on democracy...no matter who they voted for!



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:54 PM
link   
isnt obama employing a scorched earth retreat? hes mad and frusrated. No legacy.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 08:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
isnt obama employing a scorched earth retreat? hes mad and frusrated. No legacy.


The "Madness of King George Obama"?
edit on 12/16/2016 by Krakatoa because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 09:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krakatoa

originally posted by: carewemust
isnt obama employing a scorched earth retreat? hes mad and frusrated. No legacy.


The "Madness of King George Obama"?


I just looked it up. You're very close. Good job.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 09:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Doctor Smith

They could always blame the election results on Count Dracula.

Very scary, yet fictional/dead and unlikely to protest having stuff idiotically blamed on him.

Win, win, win for the Dems.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 09:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Urantia1111
a reply to: Doctor Smith

They could always blame the election results on Count Dracula.

Very scary, yet fictional/dead and unlikely to protest having stuff idiotically blamed on him.

Win, win, win for the Dems.


How could they when he voted for Hillary? Don't they also court the undead vote? I mean Hillary has those type of connections as leader of her coven doesn't she?



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 10:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Urantia1111
a reply to: Doctor Smith

They could always blame the election results on Count Dracula.

Very scary, yet fictional/dead and unlikely to protest having stuff idiotically blamed on him.

Win, win, win for the Dems.

Well, it's either ok for foreign governments to # with American elections or it's not. There's absolutely no grey area here.



posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 10:38 PM
link   
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck

There's plenty of grey area here.


+2 more 
posted on Dec, 16 2016 @ 10:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: Urantia1111
a reply to: Doctor Smith

They could always blame the election results on Count Dracula.

Very scary, yet fictional/dead and unlikely to protest having stuff idiotically blamed on him.

Win, win, win for the Dems.

Well, it's either ok for foreign governments to # with American elections or it's not. There's absolutely no grey area here.


Even if Russia did, which i pesonally dont believe, all that happened is that we found out damaging truths about HRC and the Dems.

How is that a bad thing?



new topics

top topics



 
50
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join