It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I think it’s much more likely they’d try to end the collection of data, which would minimize its value. Having continuous data is crucial for understanding long-term trends. Trends are what climate change is about — understanding these long-term changes. Think about how much better off the people who don’t want to do anything about climate change would be if all the long-term temperature trends didn’t exist.
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
Because locking data up is the way to progress science.
If they really wanted it to be safe they would distribute it far and wide.
But then if they did that, people would be able dissect the 'data' and see what a sham it is.
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: FamCore
Good for them because I too am afraid of a pathological liar who believes China created Global Warming because reasons.
originally posted by: marg6043
I have no problems with the clima change research as long as my tax dollars Is not going to fund it, with anything that have a global attach to it, we the US tax payers are the ones that are shedding the most of it.
Cut any tax dollars funding, that all I ask, let the clima change researchers get their funds by private donations.
Global Warming. It is the hoax. It is bad science. It is a high jacking of public policy. It is no joke. It is the greatest scam in history.
originally posted by: mOjOm
Shouldn't this be happening anyway???
I mean backing up our current data and knowledge in various ways and places and platforms and access levels should always be happening regardless.
Why wouldn't we be doing that in the first place???
Flipping to green energy is costing the world billions of dollars and pushing people into energy poverty. The public paid for the raw data and deserves to have it.