It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Konduit
Wikileaks has claimed from the beginning that the #DNCleaks were leaks, not hacks, and even implicated former DNC staffer Seth Rich as the source and put up a reward after he was mysteriously murdered outside his home in July.
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: sad_eyed_lady
Hate to be the one to break it to ya, but The Patriot Act
was put in place by Hillary's brother, G. W. Bush. I suppose
that while Obama has more kills by drone strike than
any other leader in history, people should be thankful
they can at least ( mostly ) walk free.
Two U.S. representatives accused Clapper of perjury for telling a congressional committee in March 2013, that the NSA does not collect any type of data at all on millions of Americans. One senator asked for his resignation, and a group of 26 senators complained about Clapper's responses under questioning. Media observers have described Clapper as having lied under oath, having obstructed justice, and having given false testimony.
In an angry letter sent to ODNI chief Clapper on Monday, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes said he was “dismayed” that the top U.S. intelligence official had not informed the panel of the CIA’s analysis and the difference between its judgment and the FBI’s assessment. Noting that Clapper in November testified that intelligence agencies lacked strong evidence linking Russian cyber attacks to the WikiLeaks disclosures, Nunes asked that Clapper, together with CIA and FBI counterparts, brief the panel by Friday on the latest intelligence assessment of Russian hacking during the election campaign.
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Pyle
Have you read the emails? DNC emails
and Podesta emails?
Whom ever leaked them did not write them!
Isn't that what this is all about?
originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: Pyle
Wikileaks protects the confidentiality of it's sources, which is why they implied that Seth Rich was involved but never said it forthright. But they did put up a 50k reward for anyone with information about his murder, which remains unsolved.
originally posted by: Pyle
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: Pyle
Joint Statement from the Department of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security
The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.
Funny 2 months ago they were singing a different tune. I wonder what changed?
Obama and Democrats needed a different set of talking points they could use to blame for the loss of the election, senate seats, house seats, governorship, state legislators etc etc etc.
Pelosi summed it up as to why they lost - source
Appearing on CBS' Face the Nation, Pelosi was asked by host John Dickerson, "The Democratic Party is in a moment of questioning about its identity. You were re-elected to lead the Democrats in the House. What do you tell Democrats who want a new direction and then, go to you, what are you going to do differently?"
"Well, I don't think people want a new direction," replied Pelosi. "Our values unify us and our values are about supporting America's working families. That's one that everyone is in agreement on. What we want is a better connection of our message to working families in our country, and that clearly in the election showed that that message wasn't coming through. But we are united in terms of the security of our country, which is our first responsibility. To be smart and strong and not reckless in how we protect the American people, strong in how we protect our economy."
UM DEMs gained seats in the house, senate and had more Americans vote for their presidential candidate.
Pelosi had predicted they could pick up more than 20 seats in the 435-seat chamber to significantly reduce their deficit, but instead the party gained just six.
The Upshot’s elections model suggests that the Democrats are slight favorites to win the Senate, based on the latest state and national polls.
From now until Election Day, we’ll update our estimates with each new poll, as well as collect the ratings of other news organizations. Here’s how our estimates have changed over time
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Pyle
I'd respectfully disagree, and have no doubt that this issue
is about the content of the emails.
Who "leaked" them is just a yuugee effort of distraction.
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Xcathdra
Honestly, I guess I initially gave them more credit than
they obviously deserved. I thought they would try and
maintain a shred of dignity, since it is her parting
bid in politics. She is now utterly, completely disgraced
on every level, and those who are supporting her in
this pathetic display of poor showmanship.
originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: Pyle
Wikileaks protects the confidentiality of it's sources, which is why they implied that Seth Rich was involved but never said it forthright. But they did put up a 50k reward for anyone with information about his murder, which remains unsolved.
originally posted by: Konduit
Wikileaks has claimed from the beginning that the #DNCleaks were leaks, not hacks, and even implicated former DNC staffer Seth Rich as the source and put up a reward after he was mysteriously murdered outside his home in July.
And Assange's confounding closeness with Siggi, which bordered on a paternal relationship, was also an issue. "The perception was that Siggi basically got to a level where Julian trusted him in a matter of days," says Snorrason. The core volunteers considered Siggi a dangerous liability, prone to youthful indiscretions and lies. But, as Domscheit-Berg recalls, the rumors were being stoked by Assange himself. "Julian told us we shouldn't speak to Siggi because he couldn't be trusted," he says. "He told me Siggi was a notorious liar, but then again Julian told people I was a notorious liar probably because he's a notorious liar. I think it's psychological. We knew Julian was dealing with Siggi all the time – it all implied Julian was using him. These are all kinds of games children get into."
Jónsdóttir was among those caught in Assange and Siggi's web. "I told Julian, 'There's something weird, I can't explain it, but I have this feeling,'" Jónsdóttir recalls. "'You just be very careful with this guy.' But he didn't believe me." Though she continuously tried to get Siggi removed from projects, Assange stood by the boy. "He might have trusted him with something that he didn't want him to expose," she says.
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Pyle
I'd respectfully disagree, and have no doubt that this issue
is about the content of the emails.
Who "leaked" them is just a yuugee effort of distraction.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: burntheships
Notice how none of these sources mention Guccifer 2.0? If you remember, he is the one who took credit for the attacks and released the documents. He said anyone can buy the Trojans that the Russians used, which he claims he bought for $1500 on some hacking forums. He throws doubt on the whole conspiracy theory of Russian hackers.
Guccifer FAQ