No, I don’t believe this guy had a conversation between himself, the Council of Abraham and Donald Trump in the spirit realm, but that doesn’t
mean I can’t post this for its entertainment value!
I think Trump should tell people that his presidency was ordained by the Council of Abraham. At the time this video was posted, Clinton was
ahead of Trump 48 percent to 39 percent among likely voters. Perhaps
Sadhu really did talk to the Council of Abraham! 😉
Prediction posted to YouTube Aug 15, 2016 @ the Lancaster Prophetic Conference | 2016
edit on 11/9/2016 by AnarchoCapitalist because: (no reason given)
Trump is incapable of purifying US politics when he outright disagrees with the non-aggression principle. He can make it less dirty but not pure. The
non-aggression principle is that you may not be the initiator of violence against another person. Trump has zero problem with using government
violence to force minorities into paying for corruption and wars they have no interest in through taxation. If you don't pay THEIR taxes, you will be
destroyed for as long as you don't fund the violence. If taxes become a legitimate social contract, signed and written, taxes will immediately become
the exactly appropriate amount for every signer. Is Trump going to give me a way to opt out of paying for wars and corrupt government departments? Opt
out of social security?
The ONLY benefit of Trump is the erosion of human rights by the supreme court will slow or stop. He cannot do anything to stop the PHILOSOPHY
destroying the world... that taking other people's property without permission is a fantastic idea and we'd all be doomed without institutionalized
crime as a way of life. The founding fathers did note that when the populace notices that they can raid other people's pocket books using the
government, the United States will end. They were correct and the solution was to not allow such a thing to happen in the first place.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.