Release WikiLeaks #27 Plus other helpful links

originally posted by: EchoesInTime
a reply to: MotherMayEye

There is a message posted by Anonymous that a new member posted in this thread.www.abovetopsecret.com...

Ah, so it did not come "directly from Wikileaks."

a reply to: MotherMayEye
Thank you!

Yes I saw it in that thread. Since it mentioned child porn I wanted to add a warning so no one accidently gets in trouble. I am still digging but have been unable to find it related to WikiLeaks. I will continue to look. It may be false but Please use caution!!!!! I don't want anyone getting in trouble!

*I am unable to find this on WikiLeaks twitter or website.

a reply to: Martin75

Interesting exchange between podesta and Neera Tanden.

Neera says Hillary instincts are typically suboptimal and appears to indicate that she wouldn't be surprised if Bill Clinton was purposely trying to sabotage her in some way.

.org/podesta-emails/emailid/29977

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 9:54 PM John Podesta wrote: > Sorry. Yes pissed. Held by our response team that wanted to let him walk > it back on his own So three hours later after he still had not done it, we > are characterized as having a belated response. > >

On Saturday, January 16, 2016, Neera Tanden wrote: > >> You mean pissed? Got held by who? Hillary. God. Her instincts are >> suboptimal. >> >> Pretty typical though. I would not be surprised if wjc told him to do it. >> Just as I'm pretty sure mark Penn didn't do his coc aine rang against >> Obama without some higher up approval. >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 9:24 PM John Podesta >> wrote:

a reply to: Martin75

I am wondering if this might be a counter op to try and reduce the number of people reading through the Wikileaks?

I cannot see Wikileaks publishing docs which include kiddie porn, or porn of any type frankly. Especially given that it seems that U.S. intel services are working with Assange and Wikileaks in order to release information regarding corruption.

imho.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Martin75

I am wondering if this might be a counter op to try and reduce the number of people reading through the Wikileaks?

I cannot see Wikileaks publishing docs which include kiddie porn, or porn of any type frankly. Especially given that it seems that U.S. intel services are working with Assange and Wikileaks in order to release information regarding corruption.

imho.

My thoughts exactly.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Martin75

I am wondering if this might be a counter op to try and reduce the number of people reading through the Wikileaks?

I cannot see Wikileaks publishing docs which include kiddie porn, or porn of any type frankly. Especially given that it seems that U.S. intel services are working with Assange and Wikileaks in order to release information regarding corruption.

imho.

I don't think that announcement was from them. They would be held responsible for distributing kiddie porn and that is not something they would do...it would compromise their integrity.

Sure they may release a bunch of other things, but kiddie porn would not be one....if they had that it would likely go directly to the FBI and other agencies.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Martin75

I am wondering if this might be a counter op to try and reduce the number of people reading through the Wikileaks?

I cannot see Wikileaks publishing docs which include kiddie porn, or porn of any type frankly. Especially given that it seems that U.S. intel services are working with Assange and Wikileaks in order to release information regarding corruption.

imho.

If anything, what this seems to be is two separate dumps. The expected one by Wikileaks, and another, unrelated dump by Anonymous.

It appears as if the two are getting lumped together. The warning posted may be a fake, along with the proposed Anonymous dump. I imagine we will find out within the next few hours, as it said they were uploading at the time of the warning.

a reply to: Jonjonj

I am touching that batch like I would a mini-nuke sold under the table . aint gonna happen . Aside from law enforcement reporting on this kind of material is it even possible for journalist to download it without implicating them selves ? I don't need to see but sure want to know if its worse then we had thought .

So even they think it is undemocratic the way that Hillary used the super delegates!

Here's one from today's release that shows them talking about a story in the NY Times:



/podesta-emails/emailid/43526

Sounds like the State department needs to be included in the investigation.

a reply to: the2ofusr1

I am going nowhere near the toxic dump, if it in fact does exist. But the Wikileaks dump? I have no doubt that it is simply Emails, as that is what they focus on.

Like I said, I think we are talking about two different things here, it is early, and will become clear as the day moves on.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

I hand't thought about that or in that way .I guess I was being selfish to not be implicated personally but yea Wikileaks would have to protect themselves .Anon on the other hand is not based in a embassy that can be invaded .

a reply to: Martin75

These are interesting.

An email chain from March 2016 discusses a Politico article which reports “Clinton faced internal pressure from her Brooklyn headquarters to oppose the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal she helped craft as secretary of State.” “Do not get our spin here,” Gene Sperling, former economic policy assistant to both Bill Clinton and Obama says. “Why we not hyping claw back, ROO, out front on steel, tough enforcement on China?! Was this just her not talking to any of us and off on her own take?(But Joel is in there ) please clarify.” Joel Benenson, a senior Clinton strategist is quoted in the piece. Tanden replies, “Is Joel off reservation? Does he not get that this story makes Hillary seem politically craven at best or a liar at worse? Or if this is campaign position, can I object?” “Hard to say she believes what she says when Joel is spinning that she doesn't mean what she is out there saying,” she adds. Email release Not all emails were released to the public in March 2015, according to a message to political consultant Jim Margolis from Clinton’s chief strategist Joel Benenson. “If there is a release of the 55K, are there others that are not being released?” Margolis asks, to which Benenson replies “Definitely”. Bernie Sanders ‘Obama betrayer’ A February 2016 exchange between strategist Joel Johnson and Podesta discusses possible attacks on Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders – Clinton’s rival for the Democratic nomination at the time. Bernie “needs to be ground to a pulp,” Johnson says. “Crush him as hard as you can.” “Where would you stick the knife in?” Podesta asks in response. “Obama betrayer (Wh will affirm). Hapless legislator (Senators/members will affirm). False promiser (policy elites will affirm). Can't win (black people will affirm),” Johnson fires back.

www.rt.com...

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Here's one from today's release that shows them talking about a story in the NY Times:

Looks like the NYTimes works directly for the Clinton Campaign but they slip up once in a while and need to be put back into place.

The NYTimes (AMY CHOZICK and PATRICK HEALY) released a news story apparently without Clintons teams approval and they were not happy. So they dealt with them?

emailid/44241

That being said, it does feel like some people who should know better took an opportunity to talk about WJC/his potential role in a way that is not helpful.

The rest is Amy/Pat and I'm dealing with them directly.

Well this one's just... bizarre. Nothing that would indict. Still.

Dear John,

This recent Mother Jones’ article referencing you caught me eye and I wanted you to be aware of it. See link below.

www.motherjones.com...

The urgency as I see it is to explain as much as possible to you and to President Obama about what we know for sure about our nonviolent ETI from the contiguous universe who are peacefully assisting us with bringing zero point energy to our fragile planet. Thank you and Eryn for letting me know when you can share a Skype talk with Terri Mansfield and me.

Best regards,
Edgar Edgar D. Mitchell, ScD
Chief Science Officer & Founder, Quantrek
Apollo 14 astronaut
6th man to walk on the Moon

https://_____.___/podesta-emails/emailid/35713

a reply to: new_here

All the ET related stuff in the Podesta leaks are (imho) deliberate Disinfo. I have not been able to track it down, but some time before these leaks (maybe a month or so before they hit) there was a poster on the chans who indicated this exact thing. References to ET/UFO phenomena and that it was part of the obfuscation scheme to try and distract attention from other items within what was leaked.

Tom Delonge met with Podesta and Co. and is tied in with the Spielberg people, he (Delonge) also has some connections to some current and former military people with odd backgrounds. Including a Major General who got retired for getting drunk and causing a scene in Russia, and someone in the Skunkworks dept at Lockheed.

I seem to be getting this a lot today, urg! Anyone else seeing this when trying to search through the emails? I can usually refresh and get what I want but just thought I would ask.

a reply to: Martin75

Been getting that off and on for a few days now. Probably due to the traffic increase they've experienced after CNN told everyone not to look.

I love it when the slimeball's tactics backfire upon themselves.

a reply to: Martin75

Thank you foryour very important warning. That's something that don't want to deal with. I'll let braver souls than I review the information.

Really appreciate the heads up.

How nice of Peter Kadzik to recommend to his son Peter JR to reach out to Podesta for a job in the Hillary campaign. How nice of John to forward it on. Just a coupla good buddies helping each other out. :/ Anybody know if Jr is working for the campaign?

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:18 PM, John Podesta wrote:
> Do you need any junior help in hq or states? Peter and Amy's son.

> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >
From: "PJ Kadzik"
> Date: May 5, 2015 7:44 AM
> Subject: Reaching Out: PJ Kadzik
> To:
> Cc: > > John,
> > > > Hope all is well for you during what I can only imagine is an extremely
> busy time.
> > > > I was with my father and Amy recently, and they both suggested I reach out
> to you. I would love to find some time to connect and see if there may be
> an opportunity for me to help on the campaign.
> > > > I have always aspired to work on a presidential campaign, and have been
> waiting for some time now for Hilary to announce so that I can finally make
> this aspiration a reality. While my professional career is still young, I
> have acquired a diverse skill set, which I believe transition well to a
> campaign setting. During my time with the Malala Fund, I worked on a
> number of advocacy initiatives and events, which solidified my ability to
> work in high pressure and fast paced environments, as well as engage a
> diverse range of constituents. Furthermore, my work with Weiss Public
> Affairs has allowed me to expand my communications and messaging
> experience, both of which position me well to take on a role on the
> campaign.
> > > > From my father's experience I understand the intensity of presidential
> campaigns, and am ready and willing to take on whatever position needs to
> be filled. I currently live in New York City, and believe I would make a
> valuable asset to someone in the campaign's headquarters. I have attached
> my resume to this email to give you a more in depth overview of my
> experience.
> > > > I would be very grateful for any support or guidance you may be able to
> provide in my quest to work on Hilary's campaign. Again, I hope all is
> well and I look forward to hearing back from you.
> > > > Many thanks,
> > PJ Kadzik

https://_____.___/podesta-emails/emailid/40450