Hillary Needed Help During The CIC Forum, Had Ear Piece

What the hell?
Do you people think that is politics?
Does one of you "Hillary is unhealthy" people even know what politics is about?
Have a look

Why am I only reading lame attacks, never ever a single discussion about if you think her economic plan would work, or why, or why not?
Her position on health care?
Education?
Shouldn't that maybe be more relevant than the #ing colour of her blazer?

originally posted by: Peeple
What the hell?
Do you people think that is politics?
Does one of you "Hillary is unhealthy" people even know what politics is about?
Have a look

Why am I only reading lame attacks, never ever a single discussion about if you think her economic plan would work, or why, or why not?
Her position on health care?
Education?
Shouldn't that maybe be more relevant than the #ing colour of her blazer?

There we go! That's a better deflection attempt than trying to convince yourself she wasn't wearing an ear piece. Bravo!

a reply to: jjkenobi

She was wearing an ear piece. So what? Has that any impact on your life?

Deflection? WHAT? Because I would like to read some content?

LOL...Right now on the tarmac talking to reporters...she's got a new hairstyle which completely covers her left ear.

a reply to: Peeple

Sure but if we're allowing earpieces then both candidates need them, otherwise how can we fairly judge each?

Surely you agree both candidates deserve to have fair and equal footing for discussing and presenting their policies to we the people, yes?

originally posted by: IAMTAT
LOL...Right now on the tarmac talking to reporters...she's got a new hairstyle which completely covers her left ear.

LMAO!

Have it on and was cracking up!

originally posted by: IAMTAT
LOL...Right now on the tarmac talking to reporters...she's got a new hairstyle which completely covers her left ear.

I am watching and noticed that too!

LoL

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Piece.
Ear piece.
A piece of pie.
Peace on earth good will towards men.

Usual leftist tactic. Ignore and obfuscate.

a reply to: Peeple

How about her advertised position on being "supportive" of Tribal Sovereignty, as is seen on her website? She hasn't addressed the Dakota Pipeline/Standing Rock because I would bet she has corporate donors who want that pipeline to happen, even if it is violating treaties and being constructed in an illegal manner

Well, once again, she has demonstrated that she likes to "talk the talk" but when it comes to her financial donors, they ALWAYS come first

a reply to: seeker1963

RIGHT?
Could it be more obvious?

a reply to: jjkenobi

Maybe I was wrong about her ear after seeing the other pictures.

Just because I disagreed with the OP doesn't mean I'm a supporter.

Where did I ever say I was a Hillary Supporter?

That's all you people ever do is assume.

a reply to: FamCore

Yes it's a shame. What do I know, right?
Maybe she will comment on it.
I could tell you my opinion on that matter, but that's pretty useless.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: seeker1963

RIGHT?
Could it be more obvious?

She is answering a question right now and she is damn sure being fed what she is saying! Are you seeing this?

Since they were not going to give her the questions in advance, she obviously needed the answers given to her.
Just another example of her complete lack of qualifications for the position.

a reply to: Junkheap

I think we assumed because that was the only explanation we could think of for why such a clear as day ear piece could be so blatantly denied not once, but multiple times.

originally posted by: Peeple
What the hell?
Do you people think that is politics?
Does one of you "Hillary is unhealthy" people even know what politics is about?
Have a look

Why am I only reading lame attacks, never ever a single discussion about if you think her economic plan would work, or why, or why not?
Her position on health care?
Education?
Shouldn't that maybe be more relevant than the #ing colour of her blazer?

There are plenty of threads on her policy, and Trumps.

Heck, there are several threads about their comments in the forum last night.

Which raises the question, why chose to comment here instead of those threads?

a reply to: starlitestarbrite

Some people say Trump is running to throw it for Hillary, but the way this is going; is it the other way around in reality. Continues to deny and lie about emails(I get she has to now), clearly has to know people will be watching her like a hawk for health issues and is dumb enough to get busted with ear piece receiver...I mean geez at least wear the hair over it. The responses should be interesting from the left and go like this:

1. She is deaf in that ear
2. There was nothing there
3. It was new type earlobe jewelry

My bet is 3...

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: seeker1963

RIGHT?
Could it be more obvious?

She is answering a question right now and she is damn sure being fed what she is saying! Are you seeing this?

Clearly obvious.
I wonder who is at the other end with the mic?

a reply to: Grambler

Show me one

a reply to: Delts95

You're wrong, so far it's been option number 2, denial, denial, denial. You won't be a millionaire this night. You shoulda used that lifeline.