It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Russia and China unite against NATO

page: 3
6
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 10 2016 @ 07:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Ohanka



If that were true there would have been no Cold War, it'd have been a real one



So its all good then?

Tell to the millions that suffered in Eastern Europe and South America though the USSR - US proxy wars,
or the trillions lost on the Military that could have been spent on their on people




posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 03:59 AM
link   
a reply to: makemap


Each country needs to be neutral and have its own personal defense and satellite to seek the truth instead of following orders under NATO.

Leading pushing them down the path to destruction.

Yaaay Europe, hows it feel to be under another boot heel?

You'd think these people'd wake up.

US out of everywhere. Yankee go home.



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 06:03 AM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

No problem.. The US will "go home" when Russia removes its occupation forces from Ukraine and Georgia.



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 08:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: intrptr

No problem.. The US will "go home" when Russia removes its occupation forces from Ukraine and Georgia.

Pffft...

The US waited till the Soviets took the whole of Eastern Europe back before jumping in at the and of WWII to get a foothold in Europe, used the Soviets as an excuse to stay on, and haven't left since. US has no business in Europe now.



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 09:28 AM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

Wow... learn WWII history.

The USSR spent 1941 to 1943 trying to stop the Nazi advance. It was not until the winter of 1943 that the USSR was able to push the Nazis out of USSR territory and into E. Europe.

The US entered the war against just Japan in Dec 1941. Then Hitler declared war on the US a few days later. Stalin kept bitching the Western allies must open a western front in order to slow / stop the German advance.

The western allies landed in Normandy June 1944, opening the front that the USSR wanted. That landing was coordinated with the USSR who launched their advance during the landings in Normandy.


The USSR started to invade E. Europe in 1939, starting first with their alliance with Nazi Germany in the invasion of Poland. The USSR then invaded Estonia Latvia and Lithuania and occupied those countries. The USSR did not take any of E. Europe until 1944.

Maybe open a book once in a while.

Russia has no business in Georgia or Ukraine. Any country can decide for themselves who they will be friendly with or not be friendly with. In case your are equally ignorant about NATO the US / other NATO members removed their presence from France when they withdrew from NATO.

The US is not going anywhere. A fact Putin seems to have overlooked when he was KGB.

Nice try though.
edit on 11-9-2016 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 02:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra


Wow... learn WWII history.

US jumped in at the end of WWI in europe to get a share in the spoils then, too.

They entered Europe late in the fighting in WWII. USSR killed millions of Germans by then, capturing millions more. The reason why Stalin complained so bitterly for the western front to be opened to take the heat off the struggle in the East, like you said. Because the west was stalling letting stalin take the brunt before joining in just to share in the spoils again.

And let Stalin finish the third reich by themselves and take Berlin at the very end anyway. How nice of the allies. Yah, we're here for the german beer.

Once the Nazis were defeated, the US then declared USSR the new enemy so they could stay on, this time apparently for good. Now its NATO threatening world stability in Eastern Europe, and elsewhere, not the friggin Russians. They went home. Can't fool me...

Yankee go home.



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 02:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

I wonder how Europe will support the UN,NATO and THEIR OWN army?
I see the US joining Russia after a while.
edit on 11-9-2016 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 02:22 PM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

No it was the COMMUNISM we REALLY HATE communism...Russia shouldn't have taken that Crimean port but with the tripe WE elected I can't say we wouldn't do the same.



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 03:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: intrptr

No it was the COMMUNISM we REALLY HATE communism...Russia shouldn't have taken that Crimean port but with the tripe WE elected I can't say we wouldn't do the same.

Take Over the Black Sea Fleets port in Sevastopol? Even the Nazis couldn't do that. And they were some dedicated Socialismists. Russians been there since 1784, anyway. They didn' take nutin'. Its just a meme of the west to justify their takin it, the Universe and everything.



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 04:07 PM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

Bit paranoid much?
No to mention Crimea wasn't IN Russia it was in Ukraine.AKA you invaded and are colonizing like your invasion ,softly.
We haven't taken bases or land ...yet.
WE asked they said OK and we overpaid them for real estate rental and blew off our expense of rebuilding assistance.
YOU should have held out for one in Alaska.
Hit another and we may be talking.
BUT I think Russia is beyond PLEASED we are pivoting in the east.
They would just find admitting it...politically wrong ..which needs to go.



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 06:36 PM
link   
a reply to: cavtrooper7

Any discussion of Ukraine or Crimea distracts from what is important to the Russians. The port of Sevastopol. NATO proponents never address that. It is key to controlling the region including the Balkans and the Black Sea and they know it.

Russians would no sooner give it up than US would give up Hawaii.



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 07:37 PM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

Axis forces took control of Sevastopol in July of 1942 when Soviet forces surrendered.

Back to that whole pick up a book comment.



posted on Sep, 11 2016 @ 07:40 PM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

Considering the port belongs to Ukraine there is nothing for the Russians to give up.

Control of the port is not key to controlling the Black Sea. The Bosphorus straights and the Dardanelles are.
edit on 11-9-2016 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 12 2016 @ 12:22 AM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

We've all known about the port,it's ancient coldwar news.
WE trained in our manuals about possible objectives.
Invading was nickleturney(sic) and an obvious move against a weak US president.



posted on Sep, 12 2016 @ 03:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: Argentbenign
It's time to look at it more serious. Today is training, tomorrow a war party. Apparently the Bulldog USA will have it's difficulties against an economical and military coalition of the chicken-lizard.


Russia and China are preparing for the Joint Sea-2016 naval drills, which are to take place in the South China Sea between 11 and 19 September. Although such manoeuvres are to be held for the 5th time, the most disputed area in the Asia Pacific, where interests of Vietnam, Brunei, Malaysia, and the Philippines are clashed, has been engaged by the Chinese and Russian military fleets for the first time. The exercises were discussed on the G20 sidelines in the Chinese Hangzhou. The Russian President Vladimir Putin claimed Monday that the drills would 'affect interests of no one and are beneficial to security of both China and Russia'. According to the Pacific Fleet spokesman, destroyers Admiral Vinogradov, Admiral Tributs, large landing ship Peresvet, tugboat Alatau, and tanker Pechenga are bound for the South China Sea. The drills are to be held at the Zhanjiang naval base. - See more at: www.pravdareport.com...


THe US is going to get us all killed if the American people dont get off their arse and do something to stop this insanity.



posted on Sep, 12 2016 @ 08:01 AM
link   
I'm aware the Germans took the port after a drawn out siege. Point being its a key strategic port and the crux of the past andcurrent conflict over Crimea and Ukraine. As far as NATO is concerned the 'enemy' is Russian presence, not "Crimea".


Lol, I guess that Hawaii doesn't belong to the United states either. Isn't considered strategic to the US Navy, either...



posted on Sep, 12 2016 @ 08:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: intrptr

We've all known about the port,it's ancient coldwar news.
WE trained in our manuals about possible objectives.
Invading was nickleturney(sic) and an obvious move against a weak US president.

Defensive posturing against a rogue US military, alll the way over therrre. Again, they didn't 'take' Crimea any more than we 'took' Hawaii.



posted on Sep, 12 2016 @ 08:05 AM
link   
Russia and China have united against NATO, dummies, because NATO is on their border. Not because Russian troops and tanks are moving towards Central Europe.

We have morons on our team. Gonna get everyone killed because they just can't keep from meddling in other countries business.

Now respond and be sure to mention Terror, Putin and Commies all in one sentence.
edit on 12-9-2016 by intrptr because: additional



posted on Sep, 12 2016 @ 11:53 AM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

Siege of Sevastopol and its capture by Axis forces. If you are going to make comments get your facts right first. Making a false claim and then trying to walk it back is beneath you.

Ah yes the same failed argument about borders when facts cant be refuted.

The US and Russia / USSR share a border. Ironically enough the countries that border Russia have not invaded Russia. Russia, on the other hand, has invaded countries on its borders.

When the USSR allied with the Nazi's and invaded Poland and the Baltics and then occupied E. Europe for 50+ years those countries wanted nothing to do with the USSR / Russia. Hence the reason they joined NATO when the USSR collapsed.

The reason NATO is close to Russia is because of Russia's / USSR occupation of those countries. Further Russia has demonstrated it will continue to invade / occupy its neighbors who aren't NATO members, pushing those countries, in addition to traditional neutral countries, to look to NATO.

Putin created the very conditions he is bitching about.
edit on 12-9-2016 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 12 2016 @ 03:43 PM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

WE didn't TAKE IT AFTER the millennium,and international agreements did not protect them at the time.
Are we to attack all colonial acts ?
BY the way they better not complain when they loose aircraft to BUZZING.
The Chinese recreated the Kamikaze pilots,we don't need IVAN getting any bright ideas.
edit on 12-9-2016 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
6
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join