It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: EndOfDays77
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: EndOfDays77
You're kidding, right?
Edit: Nevermind....I remember that train wreck of a thread....You're not kidding..
The thread is a marvel! I see you're still trolling?! The vast weight of proof is on my side..in fact go ahead and prove it! Present some tangible proof that can outweigh my own repeatably tested tangible proof instead of trying to discredit my work, with a so called smart comment, with no basis in fact..
It's the same thing Oberg does whenever he can't use rational argument against a sighting, he just spits out ridicule, but offers nothing to support his view. Very common here..
It's the same thing Oberg does whenever he can't use rational argument against a sighting, he just spits out ridicule, but offers nothing to support his view. Very common here..
originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
That second video If that was real and not doctored Wow!.
It is odd how many times they shut the feed when something pops up why not let us see? or maybe NASA isn't telling fibs....maybe the aliens are shutting the feed down.
I would If I didn't want to be seen and well was an advanced alien.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: EndOfDays77
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: EndOfDays77
You're kidding, right?
Edit: Nevermind....I remember that train wreck of a thread....You're not kidding..
The thread is a marvel! I see you're still trolling?! The vast weight of proof is on my side..in fact go ahead and prove it! Present some tangible proof that can outweigh my own repeatably tested tangible proof instead of trying to discredit my work, with a so called smart comment, with no basis in fact..
It's the same thing Oberg does whenever he can't use rational argument against a sighting, he just spits out ridicule, but offers nothing to support his view. Very common here..
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: EndOfDays77
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: EndOfDays77
You're kidding, right?
Edit: Nevermind....I remember that train wreck of a thread....You're not kidding..
The thread is a marvel! I see you're still trolling?! The vast weight of proof is on my side..in fact go ahead and prove it! Present some tangible proof that can outweigh my own repeatably tested tangible proof instead of trying to discredit my work, with a so called smart comment, with no basis in fact..
It's the same thing Oberg does whenever he can't use rational argument against a sighting, he just spits out ridicule, but offers nothing to support his view. Very common here..
If you'd like to defend the ridiculous Nibiru claims, you ought to do so in the other thread. Such discussion has no bearing on this thread.
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: EndOfDays77
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: EndOfDays77
You're kidding, right?
Edit: Nevermind....I remember that train wreck of a thread....You're not kidding..
The thread is a marvel! I see you're still trolling?! The vast weight of proof is on my side..in fact go ahead and prove it! Present some tangible proof that can outweigh my own repeatably tested tangible proof instead of trying to discredit my work, with a so called smart comment, with no basis in fact..
It's the same thing Oberg does whenever he can't use rational argument against a sighting, he just spits out ridicule, but offers nothing to support his view. Very common here..
Still waiting for you -- or ANYBODY -- to specify and document logical/factual flaws in my reports at www.jamesoberg.com/ufo.html, after all these years I'm not holding my breath.
As has been pointed out, the NASA notice referred to a specific daily program, NOT the live feeds.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: EndOfDays77
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: EndOfDays77
You're kidding, right?
Edit: Nevermind....I remember that train wreck of a thread....You're not kidding..
The thread is a marvel! I see you're still trolling?! The vast weight of proof is on my side..in fact go ahead and prove it! Present some tangible proof that can outweigh my own repeatably tested tangible proof instead of trying to discredit my work, with a so called smart comment, with no basis in fact..
It's the same thing Oberg does whenever he can't use rational argument against a sighting, he just spits out ridicule, but offers nothing to support his view. Very common here..
Still waiting for you -- or ANYBODY -- to specify and document logical/factual flaws in my reports at www.jamesoberg.com/ufo.html, after all these years I'm not holding my breath.
As has been pointed out, the NASA notice referred to a specific daily program, NOT the live feeds.
You already know deep down exactly what you are. Others do as well.
I wouldn't want to shatter your self image of perfection, so I'll just leave it at that. You already know deep down exactly what you are. Others do as well. And we weren't discussing your correct examinations of some sightings being prosaic things, we were talking of those people who rather than refer to some prosaic explanation, instead prefer to go directly to insults, ridicule, and belittling of witnesses. You also do that a lot.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
originally posted by: EndOfDays77
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: EndOfDays77
You're kidding, right?
Edit: Nevermind....I remember that train wreck of a thread....You're not kidding..
The thread is a marvel! I see you're still trolling?! The vast weight of proof is on my side..in fact go ahead and prove it! Present some tangible proof that can outweigh my own repeatably tested tangible proof instead of trying to discredit my work, with a so called smart comment, with no basis in fact..
It's the same thing Oberg does whenever he can't use rational argument against a sighting, he just spits out ridicule, but offers nothing to support his view. Very common here..
Still waiting for you -- or ANYBODY -- to specify and document logical/factual flaws in my reports at www.jamesoberg.com/ufo.html, after all these years I'm not holding my breath.
As has been pointed out, the NASA notice referred to a specific daily program, NOT the live feeds.
I wouldn't want to shatter your self image of perfection, so I'll just leave it at that. You already know deep down exactly what you are. Others do as well.
And we weren't discussing your correct examinations of some sightings being prosaic things, we were talking of those people who rather than refer to some prosaic explanation, instead prefer to go directly to insults, ridicule, and belittling of witnesses. You also do that a lot.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: shawmanfromny
Question -
Our space program has stations all over the world in order to maintain communications / remote monitoring of the ISS systems. Is it really in the realm of possibility that a live stream is susceptible to comms blackouts?