NASA ending the ISS live feed...because of UFO's????

originally posted by: ngchunter

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: EndOfDays77

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: EndOfDays77

You're kidding, right?

Edit: Nevermind....I remember that train wreck of a thread....You're not kidding..

The thread is a marvel! I see you're still trolling?! The vast weight of proof is on my side..in fact go ahead and prove it! Present some tangible proof that can outweigh my own repeatably tested tangible proof instead of trying to discredit my work, with a so called smart comment, with no basis in fact..

It's the same thing Oberg does whenever he can't use rational argument against a sighting, he just spits out ridicule, but offers nothing to support his view. Very common here..

So we allow badmouthing other members here now. My how ATS has fallen. Oh well. Here's your "Nibiru" by the way: www.youtube.com...
When the HDEV feed is still running on September 1st and after, I wonder what your excuse will be?

Checking your posts I see you know all about bad mouthing other members. Look in the mirror sometime.
And before you post off topic garbage try checking the dates.

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: ngchunter

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: EndOfDays77

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: EndOfDays77

You're kidding, right?

Edit: Nevermind....I remember that train wreck of a thread....You're not kidding..

The thread is a marvel! I see you're still trolling?! The vast weight of proof is on my side..in fact go ahead and prove it! Present some tangible proof that can outweigh my own repeatably tested tangible proof instead of trying to discredit my work, with a so called smart comment, with no basis in fact..

It's the same thing Oberg does whenever he can't use rational argument against a sighting, he just spits out ridicule, but offers nothing to support his view. Very common here..

So we allow badmouthing other members here now. My how ATS has fallen. Oh well. Here's your "Nibiru" by the way: www.youtube.com...
When the HDEV feed is still running on September 1st and after, I wonder what your excuse will be?

Checking your posts I see you know all about bad mouthing other members. Look in the mirror sometime.
And before you post off topic garbage try checking the dates.

Its like looking into a mirror and seeing another mirror which reflects back the mirror....seriously, are you telling someone else to look in a mirror?

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: ngchunter

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: EndOfDays77

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: EndOfDays77

You're kidding, right?

Edit: Nevermind....I remember that train wreck of a thread....You're not kidding..

The thread is a marvel! I see you're still trolling?! The vast weight of proof is on my side..in fact go ahead and prove it! Present some tangible proof that can outweigh my own repeatably tested tangible proof instead of trying to discredit my work, with a so called smart comment, with no basis in fact..

It's the same thing Oberg does whenever he can't use rational argument against a sighting, he just spits out ridicule, but offers nothing to support his view. Very common here..

So we allow badmouthing other members here now. My how ATS has fallen. Oh well. Here's your "Nibiru" by the way: www.youtube.com...
When the HDEV feed is still running on September 1st and after, I wonder what your excuse will be?

Checking your posts I see you know all about bad mouthing other members. Look in the mirror sometime.
And before you post off topic garbage try checking the dates.

NASA announced in a statement published on its website on July 29 that it will begin phasing out NASA Television’s Space Station Live program sometime in August and it will be discontinued on Sept. 1

Date looks fine to me. I'll see you on September 2nd when HDEV is still up and running.

bs......it don't take that long to switch-out nuthin......has to be bs,huh?

originally posted by: GBP/JPY
bs......it don't take that long to switch-out nuthin......has to be bs,huh?

You are still having problems with written English. A daily program produced by NASA-JSC PAO in Houston called 'Space Station Live' that airs normally from 11:30 to 12:00 ET will be phased out and replaced by streaming interviews and video excepts. The downlink from the external TV cameras will continue unchanged. .

originally posted by: shawmanfromny
Here's a link showing a "live" ISS Stream being shown on USTREAM. So far it looks as if the live stream is up and running, showing only this view of the ISS. Maybe I'm getting old and a tad bit wiser, but I no longer trust our government that much and I'm not too confident that everything NASA tells us is the truth.
www.ustream.tv...

Wow was i dissapointed with that spectacle , no sound effects to hear the music of the spheres or the planet shout rape to all the uninitiated , no wabble in the low earth orbit station 300+ miles up from the ground no meteorites brushing the atmosphere , no light playing tricks with the camera lense and only 500 people bother watching there are proably more viewing midget porn on the www .

Then after 15 minutes or so you get blue screen not to mention that for some reason my cpu is 80 % while viewing this site almost like they data mine for bitcoin

No zooming in or any fun thing happening anywhere on that screen , while it lasted , then i thought LAZER PEN .


What fun you could have on a live feed with one of those very powerfull models placed all over the planet on a certain night a fun friday night thread that would make live from planet earth interesting

Interesting new video -- youtu.be...

No, this is not an ambush, I just found it and have no idea of prosaic explanation yet.

Here is a new one from September 30th. Did they not cut the feed like they said they would? I think its a legit craft to me.

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
Here is a new one from September 30th. Did they not cut the feed like they said they would? I think its a legit craft to me.

It's just the latest bull# by youtuber Streetcap1 who shared a new hoax making over 200.000 views on his stupid youtube channel.

NASA, of course, didn't cut the live feed (lost signal). My debunking:

Come on now...

That object in the OP is a bug or possibly from the lens.

NASA would never hide anything and if Aliens existed and they knew it.... they would tell the world without hesitation.

Ask any astronaut... they will tell you aliens haven't been sighted and if they tell you they have seen such they are just crazy.

Oh.. and forget Oberg's assessment because his credentials although a mile long doesn't mean anything. All of his experience, research, and correspondence means nothing either.



Have a on me.

a reply to: shawmanfromny

Right at the top of the page...

NOTE: These changes will not affect live video streams from the International Space Station. Viewers can continue to see live video, as long as the ISS has signal, at www.ustream.tv... and via the High Definition Earth Viewing (HDEV) payload at eol.jsc.nasa.gov... The NASA TV channel is phasing out a daily, 30 minute show called "Space Station Live," which is not the same as the live video feeds from the station.

I'm sure we'll have plenty more UFO sightings from the ISS moving forward.

a reply to: ufoofinterest

Those lens flairs must be pretty nasty then, with many of them ending up with lost signals shortly after. Some of them could be seen as such, but that September 30 one does not look like lens flare to me. The light appears stronger on one side, maybe reflecting the sun??

originally posted by: ngchunter

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: ngchunter

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: EndOfDays77

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
a reply to: EndOfDays77

You're kidding, right?

Edit: Nevermind....I remember that train wreck of a thread....You're not kidding..

The thread is a marvel! I see you're still trolling?! The vast weight of proof is on my side..in fact go ahead and prove it! Present some tangible proof that can outweigh my own repeatably tested tangible proof instead of trying to discredit my work, with a so called smart comment, with no basis in fact..

It's the same thing Oberg does whenever he can't use rational argument against a sighting, he just spits out ridicule, but offers nothing to support his view. Very common here..

So we allow badmouthing other members here now. My how ATS has fallen. Oh well. Here's your "Nibiru" by the way: www.youtube.com...
When the HDEV feed is still running on September 1st and after, I wonder what your excuse will be?

Checking your posts I see you know all about bad mouthing other members. Look in the mirror sometime.
And before you post off topic garbage try checking the dates.

NASA announced in a statement published on its website on July 29 that it will begin phasing out NASA Television’s Space Station Live program sometime in August and it will be discontinued on Sept. 1

Date looks fine to me. I'll see you on September 2nd when HDEV is still up and running.

So uh, HDEV is still up and running exactly as predicted, and oh look, more "HDEV UFOs."

originally posted by: MamaJ
Ask any astronaut... they will tell you aliens haven't been sighted and if they tell you they have seen such they are just crazy.

Actually, I have. Have you?

Sorry, the camera I had with me that day was just my old cruddy cell phone (except for my telescope camera he was kind enough to sign, but that doesn't record video). I wrote out a full transcript though:

I am the UFO astronaut, and I take it dead serious. And I'm an incredible genius at analyzing what you can see and how it's going to look if it is there to see, and what stuff is, so I work incredibly hard at that. I do the MUFON conference every two or three years and they love me. But you know my take on it is, I've already said, there's a trillion planets out there that got life on it at least, and there's uh billions or hundreds of billions with a very advanced evolutionary strain, and I would guess there's billions that are doing interstellar travel. My own interpretation of the evidence is it hasn't been here yet. Now I'm very careful about saying, "my interpretation." I wasn't there for that abduction, I wasn't there for this. So I'm careful to say, my experience and my interpretation [coughing]. Uh but, like I said MUFON asks me now and then, they love what I've got to offer, I am so serious about the fact that it's everywhere out there, but I'm so serious I might becoming a super expert on how to look for and what you can see, and the interpretation of those things that you can see. And so um, the fact that I take that so seriously is the UFO people love me, even though I disagree in some ways from them because I happen to be an evidence-based person. But I'm careful to say, the experiences that I have had, I'm not saying you didn't have them, that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying I need to have the experience. So STS-80 was a well known one, but it depends now... when I take a video and I'm looking at stuff and it's a hundred feet away, the video that gets out there, the reader comes back doesn't know how far away the objects were. And a lot of that stuff they put it a thousand miles away. Well the videos I took of stuff is 40 feet outside and I know it came from me, if you say it's a thousand miles away you are into a very significant phenomenon. But it's not a thousand miles away. It's right here. I also look at trajectories. Every object I look at, I look at its trajectory to tell me if it came from me. Because if it came from me and no external thing touched it, I can simply trace its velocity back to me. There it goes, it came here. So there's stuff like that, and at times I'll say "that thing came from nowhere." Except I know why it came from "nowhere." There's the sun back there and the massive, the massive shuttle is behind you, it casts a huge shadow but you can't see a shadow. There's no way to see a shadow, there's nothing to shadow. Unless you have an object, you can't see a shadow. So the shadow is covering up the object. And it moves out of the shadow and pop, guess it came from nowhere. Sure it did. Or it split off into pieces and now you've got a piece reflecting a surface with the sun. So it looks like it came from nowhere. And so you've also got to understand the orbital mechanics. That's a thousand miles away but we're flying alongside, we're flying with it. Well why would they be doing a constant rocket burn forever? The difference in orbital mechanics, it's that, you know, if it's a hundred miles below me, it's a massive amount of gas you've got to use to stay with me. You're in a different orbit, and if you're out of plane with me - but anyway, that's the kind of thinking that I do. I have flown more satellites than probably any human on earth. I flew with two satellites that we had on STS-80. And so I studied them, I was like, there's a satellite, y'know, how do I see it, when do I see, what's the orbital mechanics if I'm going to get that satellite back. If we release it it pulls that way, get it back, what's it look like. Orbital mechanics, and so I take it dead seriously in terms of out there what can you see and what's this debris stuff made of. But the debris is fantastic, and so... It doesn't have - I'll say it, I'm not saying we haven't had visitors, I'm not saying we won't have visitors, but if you look at STS-6, Challenger's first flight, and so, in the manufacture of things tools fall behind compartments where you can't get to them. You say, "well that wrench fell, you've got to go get it." "I can't get it." How much of the spacecraft do you have to tear apart to get at it? It went, back there, so you don't go back there. But the incredible vibrations at launch, which are not nice, vmmmm, so everything is vmmmm. And all of the sudden you throttle back to 60% and zheaaa, zero g. Hey you want to break something out? Shake the hell of out it and pop it in zero g and it'll float out. You want to get something out? It's out. But the other little experiment you can do to make that point, is how about a gallon milk jug. And zero g you put a screw in it, that screw will get out in no time. So you got a gallon milk jug and you put a screw in the jug, how long does it take to find its way out? There's always some motion, it's not pure - it's not zero g anyway, it's a free fall condition to be physically correct. But, you just watch that screw bounce around like brownian motion, it's not brownian motion, but you watch it and it will come out through the hole. So on the launch vmmm let's all bouncing around zheeeaaa, zero g, what, if it's going to get out it gets out. So on Challenger's first flight, which I was on so ok right straight from the factory so to speak, in terms of the debris, I opened the doors and then God so help me it's home depot coming out. [Laughter] I'm not talking about washers nuts and bolts, I'm talking about whole tools [Laughter]. Hey man, this is slightly embarrassing, omg. Now you watch this going down, and of course the physics is beautiful because it's got its own rotation, and you see the trajectory unless, newton's second law, something touches it it's going to go. And then but then in and out of the shadow and other stuff is bumping into other pieces and breaking but anyway you got home depot out there but home depot is fine when it's thirty feet away. But I guarantee you, when home depot is a hundred or two hundred feet away and you got a washer that big, you know what that is, so, but I'm watching it go, but it's ok. So I'm just saying that is a quick look at how I, what I do, with physical phenomenon how dead serious I take that world. To understand what it's going to look like, how you're going to see it, what's gonna happen, and what are the sources. Now with every subsequent flight, I did fly on every single shuttle, I flew on Challenger again. And when the shuttle program progessed, it got to my last missions now, not one single thing. So Kennedy is unbelievably clean. So on the later flights, I flew on Columbia, not one single object, not one screw not one washer, they were totally clean. [Audience: The first time they were all around you outside the vehicle] No, the first time they were everywhere. Yup. The debris. [Audience: Not inside] No, they were inside too. There was a bunch of # inside too. [Laughter] Inside's Home Depot too!

Here's a suggested prosaic explanation -- shocker.
www.seeker.com...

a reply to: ngchunter

Great piece of work, I try to publicize it here:

www.jamesoberg.com...

Here are more media quotes from Story --

www.jamesoberg.com...

Me and Story at KSC a few years ago -- we worked together on his first shuttle mission in the early 1980s...

www.jamesoberg.com...

originally posted by: EndOfDays77

Clearly they are shutting down the feed due to the Loch Ness Monster.

originally posted by: JimOberg
a reply to: ngchunter

Great piece of work, I try to publicize it here:

www.jamesoberg.com...

Here are more media quotes from Story --

www.jamesoberg.com...

Me and Story at KSC a few years ago -- we worked together on his first shuttle mission in the early 1980s...

www.jamesoberg.com...

Awesome, thanks! I guess Curt provided you with the transcript, but as you might notice in the comments section of the video he got it from me. I wrote it out after people were asking for a transcript. Not a big deal, just wanted to mention that.

Maybe it's because they are expecting higher than normal UFO traffic in our area...

originally posted by: ngchunter

originally posted by: JimOberg
a reply to: ngchunter

Great piece of work, I try to publicize it here:

www.jamesoberg.com...

Here are more media quotes from Story --

www.jamesoberg.com...

Me and Story at KSC a few years ago -- we worked together on his first shuttle mission in the early 1980s...

www.jamesoberg.com...

Awesome, thanks! I guess Curt provided you with the transcript, but as you might notice in the comments section of the video he got it from me. I wrote it out after people were asking for a transcript. Not a big deal, just wanted to mention that.

always mention it -- I always strive to give full source credit. IM me the way you want to be identified.