It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: superman2012
a reply to: EternalShadow
If it really were to oppose a tyrannical government, what chance do you think the public has against a trained army?
I believe that people use that wording as an excuse. If they started going door to door collecting weapons, who is going to say no when they have a group of soldiers in front of them and their family behind them?
The Rambo mentality will not last in the face of reality. The fact is they are trained, they have better weapons and they follow orders.
Correlation does not imply causation.
originally posted by: joemoe
a reply to: superman2012
It is getting worse and worse in the US and everyone seems to want more and more guns.
Do you have proof to this? The FBI stats suggest violent crime including gun crime have been decreasing for decades. It is now at one of it lowest point in decades even as gun in circulation is at the most ever.
originally posted by: joemoe
a reply to: TheAmazingYeti
Correlation does not imply causation.
Correct! Therefore more guns does not equate to more crime.
originally posted by: EternalShadow
originally posted by: superman2012
a reply to: EternalShadow
If it really were to oppose a tyrannical government, what chance do you think the public has against a trained army?
I believe that people use that wording as an excuse. If they started going door to door collecting weapons, who is going to say no when they have a group of soldiers in front of them and their family behind them?
The Rambo mentality will not last in the face of reality. The fact is they are trained, they have better weapons and they follow orders.
My God, you sound just like the opposition to breaking away from King George.
History really does repeat itself. Wow.
time.com...
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: superman2012
The value is dependent on the individual. I see the value of the 2nd as the same as all the others. I would not be happy changing any of the amendments with the current group of elected officials.
The fact is they are trained, they have better weapons and they follow orders.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: uncommitted
...but the amendment grants the rights to a citizen, i.e., what they can do.
Incorrect. The Constitution presupposes that we already have these unalienable rights. It places a strict limit on what the government can do to curtail those rights.
The fact that the majority of amendments happened long after the deaths of the authors of the constitution kind of invalidates any total confirmation that they would have seen each amendment as being true to the spirit of what they originally wrote - that's the job of very well paid people who argue that is the case.
If that were the case they would not have incorporated the mechanism to alter the Constitution.
originally posted by: TheAmazingYeti
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: TheAmazingYeti
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: TheAmazingYeti
Finally! Take all the guns!
Use your brain not a gun.
All the guns except the ones that belong to "them" right?
I said all the guns.
I love you
Harry
'Take all the guns.'
Do tell who would be doing the 'taking'.
You would be a good citizen and comply with the unarmed Peace officer when the amendment is repealed.