It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Highly Speculative: What the B-2 Low Altitude Penetrator might have looked like

page: 2
9
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 31 2016 @ 05:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: AmericanRealist

The concept was. They looked at a low altitude penetrating platform because they thought that even with stealth they'd be too vulnerable at higher altitudes.


It's understandable. I mean, the higher "Powers" must have been thinking about what happened on May 1st, 1960.
how cheesy am I.



posted on Jul, 31 2016 @ 05:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: StratosFear
Looks close to what Ive been told about, a few things wrong though.


IMO, people who post stuff like this in here are ducks.

In fact they're anatiferous dandypratts who don't know anything so they're vague. If not ignorant, speak clearly.



posted on Jul, 31 2016 @ 08:34 AM
link   
a reply to: BASSPLYR

Yeah, I've got my own hunches about what the "Fastmover" sighting at Tikaboo saw, and there's plenty of concept art of THAT bird bouncing around the internet.

The LAP reminds me of the description of the North Sea sighting, and the timeline would have fit perfectly as well.



posted on Jul, 31 2016 @ 10:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Barnalby
a reply to: BASSPLYR


The LAP reminds me of the description of the North Sea sighting, and the timeline would have fit perfectly as well.


The Aircraft in Gibson's sighting was being escorted by F111's so I wonder if this infers LAP role/capability or is this completely unrelated?

Take this with the large pinch of salt required for internet rumors but a couple of people said that although the Northrup LAP fits the description shape and timeline, it was actually a never publicized competitor LAP that became Gibsons sighting 10 years later.



posted on Jul, 31 2016 @ 10:59 AM
link   
a reply to: Jukiodone

Well theres something that doesnt look like this LAP that pretty sexy and adroit when she moves. If i saw it during the daytime and i believe another member here did a year earlier than i hope it gets close to going grey. Whatever it was.

Hey zaph, any hope of that one going grey soon?



posted on Jul, 31 2016 @ 11:30 AM
link   
a reply to: BASSPLYR

Same rumor mill suggested that the activities in 1989 were part of FUD sowing campaign during a time of international tensions a la "Dorito's 2014".

There's obviously at least 2 or 3 triangular unknowns actually flying out there that have been pictured and there are probably that number again that have only been (allegedly) witnessed.







edit on 31-7-2016 by Jukiodone because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 31 2016 @ 11:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: Maverick7

originally posted by: StratosFear
Looks close to what Ive been told about, a few things wrong though.


IMO, people who post stuff like this in here are ducks.

In fact they're anatiferous dandypratts who don't know anything so they're vague. If not ignorant, speak clearly.



Booooo



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 05:22 AM
link   
Take a flashlight down this.....Groom Projects



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 08:59 AM
link   
a reply to: Blackfinger

I like the part where the link talks about bright star. Says it looked sorta like the xb70 and was researching quiet boom technology. It would be cool if they ever built something like that and got it opetational. I guess a man can dream though right?



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 11:56 AM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Come on Zaph, there must more you can add to this conversation!! Whats your opinion on this lovely looking bird??



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 11:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Kurokage

Zaph has left the building for awhile.



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 12:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Kurokage

Zaph has left the building for awhile.


I heard your wifi works outside

You don't need to be in the building to comment on the looks of the plane (we've all guessed something like this is flying so you don't have to comment on that!)



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 12:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Kurokage

This should be Zaph's new Avatar.



And I'm going to assume that somewhere in the past this aircraft has been discussed on these boards. With some images and links to some patents.

So....




posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 12:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Kurokage

OK, Zaph has left the planet for a few days. My wifi doesn't work here.

I'll be back after I deal with an ugly head cold and having to drive 600 miles a day.
edit on 8/1/2016 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 01:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

Looks at zaph suspiciously. Convenient. A little too convenient....



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 02:35 PM
link   
Come on guys... who needs FSME's when we got the Michael Schratt big PDF of legit classified projects to aid us?





I'll start by saying the fluxliner looks to have a low probability of likelihood.
Who's next?



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 02:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Jukiodone

Hehehe!! Thanks for making me laugh. So true!



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 04:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

I hear there's a lot of these head colds going around, they have the ability to stop the suffers fingers from typing on any type of keyboard so you've done really well in responding like you have!


I just think this plane looks far more sexy than a B2. What do you think, is she sexy or not??

Grey580 that's Zaph all over!!

edit on 1-8-2016 by Kurokage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 04:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Kurokage

Definitely Sexy.

Hey zaph head colds are good for Something.

if its really bad i suggest you go out side and skywatch. You never know, you might be able to see something you shouldn't.



posted on Aug, 1 2016 @ 04:57 PM
link   
a reply to: BASSPLYR

Getting the hell out of LA will help.



new topics

top topics



 
9
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join