It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: reldra
There were at least four who died in Benghazi, not counting our ambassador. Can you say with any certainty at all that the emails had absolutely nothing to do with that? After all, it was the Benghazi investigations that uncovered the private server in the first place.
Benghazi, thankfully, is over. I will not be dragged there.
originally posted by: Konduit
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: reldra
There were at least four who died in Benghazi, not counting our ambassador. Can you say with any certainty at all that the emails had absolutely nothing to do with that? After all, it was the Benghazi investigations that uncovered the private server in the first place.
Benghazi, thankfully, is over. I will not be dragged there.
I know right, those 4 dead Americans were such an inconvenience to Hillary.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: starfoxxx
They were scheduled to appear together right after the Orlando shootings but that event delayed it. He didn't wait. He endorsed her right after the California primary.
I understand that she's evil incarnate - goes without saying - not even going to get into all that. Anyhow - maybe she knew exactly what she was doing - and that's why she's being let off the hook
originally posted by: Konduit
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: reldra
There were at least four who died in Benghazi, not counting our ambassador. Can you say with any certainty at all that the emails had absolutely nothing to do with that? After all, it was the Benghazi investigations that uncovered the private server in the first place.
Benghazi, thankfully, is over. I will not be dragged there.
I know right, those 4 dead Americans were such an inconvenience to Hillary.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: IAMTAT
Do you support the idea of electing her...knowing full well she lied to you and everyone else in the country?
I've said many times that I am not voting in this election, considering the choices we have.
Clinton lies, Trump lies, you lie...everyone lies.
I find it disingenuous to get on a moral high horse and exclaim one's hypocrisy for all to see.
a reply to: UnBreakable
Since when do you have a problem with dishonesty? You support the poster child of dishonesty.
When have I ever stated I support Hillary? I've said the opposite numerous times.
Stop with the personal crap and accept reality, ladies. We have better things to do then cry about this nonsense any longer.
"Everyone lies"...got it.
Does everyone lie about jeopardizing national security?
I don't think so.
originally posted by: matafuchs
I still think the main reason is for not what Hillary knows, but, who could be complacent in the emails and the web it weaves.
HUMINT is very important and it was explained that she had information regarding assets on that server. How is this forgivable?
I am sure that there are those who are dead because of this server. I personally feel that it was her negligence along with the certain aide that caused the death of those SEALS and other OPs in Afghanistan in 2011.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Admire her or not, this will taint anything she does forever.
The meeting with Lynch and Bill.
Her lying to the media.
She may very well still become president.
But the stench of this, like a Taco Bell bathroom, will linger on for decades.
Oh we get it, but maybe not quite in the way that you think.
It's all rotten and corrupt and she knows that game.
originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: reldra
I know, you can't blame the Secretary of State for ignoring calls for help from US embassy under attack for 13 hours straight.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: butcherguy
That doesn't prove that she was intentionally careless, knowing that info would be compromised due to her carelessness.
originally posted by: Bone75
a reply to: introvert
The question isn't about whether or not she intended to harm the US by sending classified information over an unsecured network.
The question is whether or not she intended to send classified information over an unsecured network.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: IAMTAT
Do you support the idea of electing her...knowing full well she lied to you and everyone else in the country?
I've said many times that I am not voting in this election, considering the choices we have.
Clinton lies, Trump lies, you lie...everyone lies.
I find it disingenuous to get on a moral high horse and exclaim one's hypocrisy for all to see.
a reply to: UnBreakable
Since when do you have a problem with dishonesty? You support the poster child of dishonesty.
When have I ever stated I support Hillary? I've said the opposite numerous times.
Stop with the personal crap and accept reality, ladies. We have better things to do then cry about this nonsense any longer.
"Everyone lies"...got it.
Does everyone lie about jeopardizing national security?
I don't think so.
It is okay if you are a Democrat.