It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pacific Ocean radiation back near normal after Fukushima: study

page: 2
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 03:35 PM
link   
Not according to a brand new, honest study.





peakoil.com...




posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 03:51 PM
link   
a reply to: AshFan

That's a tsunami dispersal pattern, it has nothing to do with radiation.

One big piece of misinformation there.



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 03:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: AshFan

That's a tsunami dispersal pattern, it has nothing to do with radiation.

One big piece of misinformation there.


Did you read the link?



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 04:06 PM
link   
a reply to: AshFan

The link doesn't work, but jadedANDcynical is right, that picture has been used numerous of times, and debunked the same amount of times.

It's a disinfo picture..

SOURCE


However, while the Fukushima disaster still poses several very real dangers, that image doesn’t accurately depict any of them. That’s because it’s not of radiation of all: the map was created by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to chart wave patterns from the March 2011 Tohoku earthquake, according to Snopes.

edit on 3-10-2016 by Mianeye because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 04:18 PM
link   
a reply to: AshFan

Didn't need to read the link to know. It had been posted in the original Fukushima mega thread (RIP) and, as Mianeye says, has been debunked many times.

Wikipedia



NOAA was the agency originally responsible for the image.
edit on 3-10-2016 by jadedANDcynical because: Fixed link



posted on Oct, 3 2016 @ 04:36 PM
link   
Three melted through containment. One or more are leaking Cesium into the Pacific.

Safe, my a**.



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 06:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: AshFan

Didn't need to read the link to know. It had been posted in the original Fukushima mega thread (RIP) and, as Mianeye says, has been debunked many times.

Wikipedia



NOAA was the agency originally responsible for the image.


Do you also debunk Obsrvr's ass?



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 08:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Profusion

Ill believe it when I stop glowing.



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 11:12 AM
link   
a reply to: AshFan




Not according to a brand new, honest study.

Radiation is measured in centimeters?

Oh. Covered, I see.
That's what you get for having a post at the top of a page, I guess.

edit on 10/4/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 4 2016 @ 11:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Q: Does light have mass?
A: Of course not. It's not even Catholic!!!



posted on Oct, 22 2016 @ 03:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: Profusion

Radiation levels across the Pacific Ocean are rapidly returning to normal five years after a meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear plant spewed gases and liquids into the sea, a study showed Monday.

Japan shut down dozens of reactors after a magnitude 9.0 earthquake-generated tsunami on March 11, 2011 triggered one of the largest ever dumps of nuclear material into the world’s oceans.

In the days following the quake and explosions at Fukushima, seawater meant to cool the nuclear reactors instead carried radioactive elements back into the Pacific, with currents dispersing it widely.

LINK


It's nice to have unequivocally good news concerning the Fukushima Daiichi disaster. I'm still not eating fish anymore. Bioaccumulation of radiation is happening in the Pacific Ocean regardless what the overall levels of radiation are. Since it's often impossible to know with certainty where the fish you may eat is coming from, I believe fish can no longer be consumed at all.

Bioaccumulation of radiation in an ocean is a very simple process. In the Pacific Ocean, fish are contaminated in the coastal waters off Fukushima, and they swim to other places in the Pacific Ocean. When they're eaten, bioaccumulation spreads throughout the food chain.


sorry but the half life of uranium and cesium is not that short lol, try 10000 years.

also that plant they havent even removed all the warped rods yet and they cant seal the reactors for at least 40 years.

they cooling the reactors with sea water, and dumping 300 tons of it a day into the ocean cuz they cant make storage tanks fast enough to store the contaminated water.

also japanese government put a ban on any health information on japanese epidemiological studies. they aint hiding the health affects on the population cuz everything is hunky dory now.



posted on Nov, 16 2016 @ 02:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: Profusion

Radiation levels across the Pacific Ocean are rapidly returning to normal five years after a meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear plant spewed gases and liquids into the sea, a study showed Monday.

Japan shut down dozens of reactors after a magnitude 9.0 earthquake-generated tsunami on March 11, 2011 triggered one of the largest ever dumps of nuclear material into the world’s oceans.

In the days following the quake and explosions at Fukushima, seawater meant to cool the nuclear reactors instead carried radioactive elements back into the Pacific, with currents dispersing it widely.

LINK


It's nice to have unequivocally good news concerning the Fukushima Daiichi disaster. I'm still not eating fish anymore. Bioaccumulation of radiation is happening in the Pacific Ocean regardless what the overall levels of radiation are. Since it's often impossible to know with certainty where the fish you may eat is coming from, I believe fish can no longer be consumed at all.

Bioaccumulation of radiation in an ocean is a very simple process. In the Pacific Ocean, fish are contaminated in the coastal waters off Fukushima, and they swim to other places in the Pacific Ocean. When they're eaten, bioaccumulation spreads throughout the food chain.


fukishima also doesnt just affect the ocean. when the reactor blew it shot up radiation into the upper atmosphere. its why when there is significant rainfall around areas where they have monitoring in north america and asia, you see the radcon 4 and 5 alerts. its means parts of fukishima in the atmosphere is coming down and its being picked up on detection monitors. can see it on this netc.com site.

www.netc.com...



posted on Nov, 16 2016 @ 07:50 PM
link   
When I clicked the original link it said the article was expired, so I did a search and found the story posted at this link:
www.japantimes.co.jp...



posted on Nov, 16 2016 @ 08:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Profusion

The PTB expect people to not know that cesium-137, one of the two major isotopes released, has a 1/2 life of 37 years. Radiation levels physically cannot return to even 1% of normal for at least 7 half lives or 259 years. Radioactive levels in seawater were 10 to 100 times higher than before the nuclear accident in 2013 according to many studies conducted. Do they seriously expect us to believe that despite nearly continuous leakage that the laws of radioactive decay don't apply anymore.
edit on 16-11-2016 by richapau because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 16 2016 @ 09:12 PM
link   

Taking into account that the 134Cs/137Cs activity ratio was about 1 just after release and was extremely uniform during the first month after the accident, the amount of 137Cs released by the FNPP1 accident increased the North Pacific inventory of 137Cs due to bomb testing during the 1950s and early 1960s by 20%.


Spatial and temporal distributions of 134Cs and 137Cs derived from the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident in the North Pacific Ocean by using optimal interpolation analysis

Yeah, that 20% increase in ocean wide radiation is nothing to worry about.

Oh yeah, it's going to keep doing this (leaking highly irradiated water) for the next how many millennia?

That's 3, count them, 3 level 7 nuclear cockups sitting on the Pacific ocean.

One of the cores isn't where they expected after they pointed a muon camera at where it was supposed to be trying to image it.

No known technology exists that can deal with the intense radiation near the molten coriums (coria? what's the proper plural?), even hardened robots dies after short exposure too close to the cores.



new topics

top topics



 
4
<< 1   >>

log in

join