It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Shamrock6
Reproduction of information meant only to be read, not copied could be treasonous though, especially if reproduction was then followed by off site, unsecured storage, like her private email server or other storage mediums available to a person outside the intelligence industry.
All of which goes beyond "simply seeing." Which, again, is the claim.
And that's still not treason. Again, violation of security laws yes. Treason no.
Seriously, does anybody know what the crime of treason actually is, or is it just the cool buzzword because Clinton?
And despite the opinion of some on ats, there are genuine patriots in every agency, at every level. Could be somebody along those lines.
originally posted by: [post=20941220]jadedANDcynical
How many would fight to keep the status quo simply because right now, their lives aren't all that bad, and the alternative (war or major civil upheaval) only makes their lives worse in the short and long term?
originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
a reply to: thenightisours
Trump is better than Clinton (another example of something better than Hillary Clinton is contracting herpes) but he's also part of the problem and involved in the corruption. (His part of the corruption was relatively low-key stuff though.)
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: jimmyx
4chan?....anonymous posters?.....yeah, right....sounds legit to me........NOT.
I agree with you here jimmyx.
4chan has zero credibility.
If it is true, it was the worst place to drop it.