It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: xuenchen
Did Obama mention "Islam" today?
If not why not.
We are at war with ISIS afterall.
Why all the side stepping?
originally posted by: xuenchen
Did Obama mention "Islam" today?
If not why not.
We are at war with ISIS afterall.
Why all the side stepping?
originally posted by: Willtell
originally posted by: xuenchen
Did Obama mention "Islam" today?
If not why not.
We are at war with ISIS afterall.
Why all the side stepping?
Because Obama and his master Valerie Jarrett are fools
She doesn’t want him to be a war president
Look a president DOES WHAT HE HAS TO DO
NOT WHAT HE WANTS TO DO!
Trump: 'Appreciate the congrats for being right on radical Islamic terrorism'
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: SgtHamsandwich
originally posted by: kaylaluv
So he said the word terrorist? So much for the predictions that he wouldn't.
No.
He was very careful to do just as was predicted. He called it an act of terror and an act of hate without the slightest inkling of connecting it to anyone, whether it be a religion, or terrorist group.
Not so. He said exactly what he should say. He said 'act of terror'. It is the FBI's job to describe what they are investigating it as. As far as I know, Obama is not an investigator. He stated what the FBI is investigating it as and also said every resource would be given to not just the FBI, but DHS and other law enforcement agencies.
The FBI has not definitively linked this to anything. They stated how they were investigating it. They made no conclusions, either. Therefore, it is an ongoing investigation, that has JUST started.
Read the title of the thread.
originally posted by: [post=20844659]Informer1958
Now the government can move forth with their gun control agenda so we all can be unarmed and killed by terrorists.
If all Americans were armed I guaranteed, most of these people would be alive today.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: reldra
Now the government can move forth with their gun control agenda so we all can be unarmed and killed by terrorists.
If all Americans were armed I guaranteed, most of these people would be alive today.
You can't be serious. In a crowded nightclub, in low light and strobing lights, everyone armed would have made the death toll higher. Inability to see the target, ricochet.
Are you calling this a false flag to further an agenda?
originally posted by: Willtell
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Willtell
The irony is that Obama’s failure to act might help Trump win!
Trump soon will be all over the place saying
See. I told you so
To act how? please share your ideas.
Very simple, as I posted way back...
At the first sign of the ISIS victories, what now over a year ago....
Obama should have led....A WORLD COALITION OF AT LEAST 100,00,TROOPS INCLUDING ARAB AND SYRIAN TROOPS IN A MASSIVE EFFORT TO WIPE ISIS OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH.
Now its only going to get worst or now the US might really overreact when they should have acted a long time ago big time
originally posted by: SgtHamsandwich
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: SgtHamsandwich
originally posted by: kaylaluv
So he said the word terrorist? So much for the predictions that he wouldn't.
No.
He was very careful to do just as was predicted. He called it an act of terror and an act of hate without the slightest inkling of connecting it to anyone, whether it be a religion, or terrorist group.
Not so. He said exactly what he should say. He said 'act of terror'. It is the FBI's job to describe what they are investigating it as. As far as I know, Obama is not an investigator. He stated what the FBI is investigating it as and also said every resource would be given to not just the FBI, but DHS and other law enforcement agencies.
The FBI has not definitively linked this to anything. They stated how they were investigating it. They made no conclusions, either. Therefore, it is an ongoing investigation, that has JUST started.
Read the title of the thread.
My reply was to kalaluv and not to your op. I fully understand your thread title. She was under the impression that Obama called him a terrorist when he in fact did not.
I agree with you that he said exactly what he needed to say about the shooter as no one really knows all the facts at this moment as much more needs investigated.
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: reldra
So these savages are going to keep killing innocent Americans and other people all over the planet
Look a war is always bad but its necessary when you’re attacked
It’s just that simple
Either he does it or the next president will
what happens when they get a nuke?
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Willtell
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Willtell
The irony is that Obama’s failure to act might help Trump win!
Trump soon will be all over the place saying
See. I told you so
To act how? please share your ideas.
Very simple, as I posted way back...
At the first sign of the ISIS victories, what now over a year ago....
Obama should have led....A WORLD COALITION OF AT LEAST 100,00,TROOPS INCLUDING ARAB AND SYRIAN TROOPS IN A MASSIVE EFFORT TO WIPE ISIS OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH.
Now its only going to get worst or now the US might really overreact when they should have acted a long time ago big time
And how does he go about forcing this leadership plan upon the world? And how easy do you think it would be for him to get ground troops for this? You seem to have no idea about how all of this works.