It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dubiousone
The military trains its recruits to follow orders and not deviate from prescribed procedures and protocols unless someone up the chain of command orders otherwise. Are you saying that THE training no longer works and everyone over there in Iraq is doing whatever the hell they want regardless of their training. That would indeed be a brave new world.
Originally posted by ancientsailor
I for one thought, even if the so called big shots told me to do this, I would of been court marshalled for not following orders. Guilty or not of war crimes of POW, prisoners are not treat, never treated like that. They violated the code of conduct in my book. Now the rest of the ring will be bitting the bullet.
Originally posted by Seekerof
And as such, despite the mention of some within this thread, findings indicated that Mr. Grainer acted voluntarily and independently. There were no "higher-up" superior orders for him to do what he and others did at Abu Ghraib.
seekerof
A military jury Saturday sentenced Army Reserve Spc. Charles Graner to 10 years in prison, downgraded him to private with loss of pay and gave him a dishonorable discharge after convicting him on charges of abusing detainees at Baghdad's Abu Ghraib prison. At the sentencing phase of the court-martial he said that he was merely following orders from civilian contractors and military intelligence
As such, even "if" he was following orders, doing so does not mean that he is exempt from responsibility for his subsequent actions that pertained to those alledged "orders". The Nuremburg Trails give prime example of those that tried to use the excuse that they were following "orders". Doesn't cut it, and certainly doesn't make for a credible excuse, whether it was torture or abuse.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Irregardless of what the article asserts, I guess you missed what else I said?
As such, even "if" he was following orders, doing so does not mean that he is exempt from responsibility for his subsequent actions that pertained to those alledged "orders". The Nuremburg Trails give prime example of those that tried to use the excuse that they were following "orders". Doesn't cut it, and certainly doesn't make for a credible excuse, whether it was torture or abuse.
seekerof
Graner did not testify during his trial, but during the sentencing phase Saturday he took the witness stand to repeat the defense claim that the jury clearly rejected: that he had been ordered by intelligence agents at Abu Ghraib to abuse the prisoners to make them easier to interrogate.
His attorney, Guy Womack, asked him why he was smiling in the infamous photos, some of which were shown while Graner spoke.
“I’m smiling now, and that’s a nervous smile,” Graner said.
Graner described himself as a by-the-book prison guard corrupted by superiors who ordered him to physically mistreat and sexually humiliate detainees.
He said he initially resisted pressure to mistreat prisoners, but his Army superiors made it clear to him that he was expected to obey the commands of the military and civilian intelligence agents who ran his part of Abu Ghraib.
Graner said a lieutenant in his unit told him: “If (military intelligence) asks you to do this, it needs to be done. They’re in charge, follow their orders.”
He said he now knows that those orders were unlawful, but “at the time my understanding is that they were (lawful), or I wouldn’t have done them,” he said.
* * * *
A month later, President Bush urged Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to make sure that any guilty U.S. soldiers be punished for “shameful and appalling acts.”
The BBC's Jim Muir in Baghdad says with elections only two weeks away, violence wracking many areas and daily life for many people a harsh struggle for survival, most Iraqis have not exactly been following the Abu Ghraib prosecutions with baited breath.
But he says, now that the verdict on Graner is out, most of those who are aware of the case believe the sentence should have been tougher.
Originally posted by Seekerof
findings indicated that Mr. Grainer acted voluntarily and independently. There were no "higher-up" superior orders for him to do what he and others did at Abu Ghraib.
seekerof
Originally posted by dh
While Graner goes down, the private companies immersed in the torture scandals, CACI and Titan pick up renewed contracts worth $16 million and $164 million dollars respectively
observer.guardian.co.uk...
The Bush administration gets 4 more years
Originally posted by dubiousone
Good points dh. Maybe those listed as responsible need to be worried that someday, even after they leave office, they'll be nabbed while traveling abroad and brought before the International Court of Justice.
[edit on 1/16/2005 by dubiousone]