Arguably The Most Important Documentary In The History Of Medicine Was Just Released

a reply to: PeterMcFly

Yes....the 'battery' of the cell.

Also, your nic picture too...do you work in biotech?

a reply to: TerryDon79

Look for a doctor who believed all cancer was a fungus and acidic. He lost his licence, killed 3 people, released a ton of books and still says it works.

And maybe he was on to something for one type of cancer. They now believe some heart attacks and brain and lung and other diseases are caused by parasites. There can be different causes for the same illness.

originally posted by: NautPsycho
Get your kidneys properly filtering so your body can eliminate the acidic cellular wastes via the lymphatic system which is heavily congested genetically these days. .

Acidic cellular waste? Lymphatic system genetically congested?

Please explain the pathophysiology behind it.

originally posted by: SeaWorthy
a reply to: TerryDon79

Look for a doctor who believed all cancer was a fungus and acidic. He lost his licence, killed 3 people, released a ton of books and still says it works.

And maybe he was on to something for one type of cancer. They now believe some heart attacks and brain and lung and other diseases are caused by parasites. There can be different causes for the same illness.

He was never on to something.

Cancer IS NOT a fungus.

Cancer IS cells mutating and replicating.

Seriously, biology 101 stuff.

a reply to: NautPsycho

I have never seen so much wrong with a single post.

You can't excrete cancer.

Acid =/= Cancer

Did you just read the first pseudoscience article that came up on google?

a reply to: TerryDon79

Also, if you look at most of the alternate cancer cure sites, they want you to buy a book.

Actually most have books available there is a difference. My friend who cured herself of major cancer could not convince her husband many years later as he wished to eat steak and donuts, he died she lived. She has died just now 20 years later from heart attack and I don't know the diet she used if she had a book I would be glad to get it.

a reply to: SeaWorthy

All your post is is another testimony.

Testimony =/= Evidence/Proof

a reply to: TerryDon79

Look for a doctor who believed all cancer was a fungus...

Spouse have worked as a cytotechnologist.

Definition of cytotechnologist:

Cytotechnologists are laboratory professionals who study cells and cellular anomalies. Using a microscope, they examine slides of human cells for any indication that a cell is abnormal and/or diseased (i.e., cancerous or precancerous lesions, infectious agents or inflammatory processes).

Basically she examined cells taken from a tumor to id them. I asked her if she ever saw presence of fungus like C. albicans or others. The answer was NO.

I also asked if fungus was to ever be present in the biopsied tumor, would the fungus also show up on the slide after sample preparation. The answer was YES.

I think that pretty much put to rest the myth of fungus causing cancer.

originally posted by: SeaWorthy
a reply to: TerryDon79

Look for a doctor who believed all cancer was a fungus and acidic. He lost his licence, killed 3 people, released a ton of books and still says it works.

And maybe he was on to something for one type of cancer. They now believe some heart attacks and brain and lung and other diseases are caused by parasites. There can be different causes for the same illness.

Well..that's accurate in the sense that HPV is a virus, a virus that can and does lead to cervical cancer.

So in at least one type of cancer, viral infections / parasites do cause cancer.

originally posted by: Shiloh7
a reply to: rickymouse

You are right on the nose. Cancer research is one of the best examples of corruption and greed because its has so much funding and some people are making huge sums of money out of it and the ghastly cures people are having to suffer today - often they don't work either.

Unless we make a stand at breaking down some of the power of these corporations involved this will simply go on and its now 1 in 2 what a terrible statistic.

You hang a bag of money over the side of a cliff and someone will figure a way to get that bag. Most people won't question why that bag is hanging out there. So many people fail going off the cliff so one person can get rich. If you wait long enough, the pile of bodies will make it possible to just go out and grab that bag of money.

a reply to: PeterMcFly

People still believe it's a fungus though.

Why? Coz some dude on t'internet says so!

a reply to: MysterX

do you work in biotech?

No, just having some knowledge in biochemistry and actively studying it.

I've seen people with the same hole in their throats from cancer that my father had back in the late 70s. If their making progress, it's awful slow.

I work in pharmacy and I have to tell you, if the pharmaceutical companies come up with a chemo drug that has a 2 precent better outcome than next leading chemo drug they jump on it. That's why people who work in the medical field generally do not buy the "they have the cure" theory. Do you realize how much a cure would go for? Look up Harvoni. In 90 precent+ of hepatitis c patients it cures the disease. Over a course of three treatments they are cured, wanna guess how much it costs? It costs my pharmacy over 80 thousand dollars to buy the three bottles consisting of the entire treatment. You know what is even crazier? Insurance companies almost never reject it because it is cheaper over the long run (less hospitalizations). Trust me, if they had a cure it would be bottled and accessible to you... At a cost

a reply to: korath

Progress in research doesn't always mean progress to a cure.

The progress could be as simple as discovering a new direction to look at.

It's not a linear thing, is what I'm trying to say.

originally posted by: Drocms
I work in pharmacy and I have to tell you, if the pharmaceutical companies come up with a chemo drug that has a 2 precent better outcome than next leading chemo drug they jump on it. That's why people who work in the medical field generally do not buy the "they have the cure" theory. Do you realize how much a cure would go for? Look up Harvoni. In 90 precent+ of hepatitis c patients it cures the disease. Over a course of three treatments they are cured, wanna guess how much it costs? It costs my pharmacy over 80 thousand dollars to buy the three bottles consisting of the entire treatment. You know what is even crazier? Insurance companies almost never reject it because it is cheaper over the long run (less hospitalizations). Trust me, if they had a cure it would be bottled and accessible to you... At a cost

And in the UK (and 57 other countries) we get it all for free, the government pays...... so much for hidden cures and Big Pharma conspiracy.

originally posted by: Agartha

originally posted by: Drocms
I work in pharmacy and I have to tell you, if the pharmaceutical companies come up with a chemo drug that has a 2 precent better outcome than next leading chemo drug they jump on it. That's why people who work in the medical field generally do not buy the "they have the cure" theory. Do you realize how much a cure would go for? Look up Harvoni. In 90 precent+ of hepatitis c patients it cures the disease. Over a course of three treatments they are cured, wanna guess how much it costs? It costs my pharmacy over 80 thousand dollars to buy the three bottles consisting of the entire treatment. You know what is even crazier? Insurance companies almost never reject it because it is cheaper over the long run (less hospitalizations). Trust me, if they had a cure it would be bottled and accessible to you... At a cost

And in the UK (and 57 other countries) we get it all for free, the government pays...... so much for hidden cures and Big Pharma conspiracy.

How do you think the government pays?

It's called TAXES, on everything.

The government is taking the money YOU pay to the government in taxes, to pay for your medical bills, and everyone else's medical bills..

It's not "FREE HEALTHCARE", it's a single-payer healthcare funded by taxes... by you.

No such thing as a "free lunch".. (or free healthcare)

a reply to: Cygnis

Completely wrong.

You don't have to work a day in your life and you still get free health care.

ETA: If you want to be accurate then yes, taxes pay for health care. The meaning of "free health care" is that you don't pay through insurance or each time you visit.

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Cygnis

Completely wrong.

You don't have to work a day in your life and you still get free health care.

Socialist-healthcare, it's still not free, someone is paying.

Unless, of course, your in a magical society where money doesn't exist, and everything is free and provided with abundance.

a reply to: BO XIAN

It is clear we are being lied to and its sick. I see cancer as a way to depopulate the world and they know about this. They must do as I have heard many doctors that have retired treat patients with their methods and cured them. A lady only recently cured her own illness with a drug injection. It is a sick plight to try help people but in reality they are not. This is why when I see a cancer advert on TV it makes me sick. It is displaying that they are trying, when they are not while asking for more money. Its disgusting.

I am currently busy with my own ventures but when I get the time, I am going to try my dam hardest to try uncover something about this, find something as I feel with a little effort I could achieve more advancements then these so called scientists.