It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So what if she handed her a book on rejecting religion is that also grounds for firing?
"I felt... there was some injustice to what had happened and I felt that this was an avenue where I could stand and say, I would like it to be heard that this doesn't seem to be as it ought to be in a country where we are supposed to be able to be free with each other," she said.
originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: mirageman
"I felt... there was some injustice to what had happened and I felt that this was an avenue where I could stand and say, I would like it to be heard that this doesn't seem to be as it ought to be in a country where we are supposed to be able to be free with each other," she said.
I think we can say byebye to those days when we could talk freely with each other.
Lesson learned.
originally posted by: JDmOKI
a reply to: Gryphon66
For some reason I feel like if the lady was an atheist instead of Christian you would be outraged.
Again, you are making the assumption that all the initiation was on the Christian woman's part, that there was no reason at all to think the Muslim woman was in any way receptive or taking part in these discussions in a manner that encouraged these interactions.
You are operating off the paradigm that all Christians just can't wait to shove our religion down some poor benighted person's throat because it's just what we do which simply displays your prejudice. There just isn't enough information here to really support that.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: ketsuko
My allegations??? By the woman's OWN words she was proselytizing.
BOTH women discusses relgion at work BOTH would be guilty of that If that was actually the case. She wasnt holding sermons or grabbing anyone and shaking them saying Satan b e gone was she?
A Christian health worker in the NHS has lost her appeal against a ruling which suspended her for giving a religious book to a Muslim colleague.
She had given her a book about a Muslim woman's encounter with Christianity and asked her to church.
She [the complainant] also alleged an incident when Miss Wasteney [the Christian "missionary"] put her hand on her knee in a prayer that lasted for 10 minutes, asking God to come to her. The colleague said she felt like she was being groomed.
originally posted by: Bone75
originally posted by: Annee
Was there a policy of no religion at work?
If so, then I'm curious as to how the Muslim woman dressed for work.
originally posted by: Bone75
originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: mirageman
"I felt... there was some injustice to what had happened and I felt that this was an avenue where I could stand and say, I would like it to be heard that this doesn't seem to be as it ought to be in a country where we are supposed to be able to be free with each other," she said.
I think we can say byebye to those days when we could talk freely with each other.
Lesson learned.
Perhaps over in Sissyland where this happened, but not where I work. My crew is an extremely diverse bunch of Christians, Atheists, Blacks, Whites, Latinos, and Lesbians.....
and we dog each other and laugh all day long. We're also the very best at what we do if I must say so myself.
The NSS said at the time that there was probably more to this story than was being revealed by the Christian Legal Centre and, indeed, there is. Much more. We have obtained a copy of the tribunal judgment and it tells the whole story of Ms Wasteney's determined evangelism in the psychiatric hospital where she worked. She started work in the hospital in 2007. In 2011 she approached her line manager, Mr Wilson and asked whether "the Trust could provide a Christian Worship Service at the John Howard Centre." She suggested that this could be provided by her church – The Christian Revival Church. After consulting the chaplain, Mr Wilson agreed to the idea for a probationary period, only on the understanding that the services would be "ecumenical" in nature, so it would have broad appeal and that all Christians who wanted to could attend. Within weeks of the church arriving in the hospital complaints began to arrive on Mr Wilson's desk about the nature of the services it was conducting. The Matron said that staff who were escorting patients to the services were being pressurised to participate in the worship and give their personal details. This is how the tribunal judgment then describes what happened: . . .