I can't speak for anyone else who watched this video, but I know it was rather unsettling.
For those of you who don't have time to watch this video, I can help summarize some of the information these remote viewers saw revolving around the
9/11 attack on the Pentagon and World Trade Towers.
I was jumping around to save time when trying to gather the main points, so if any one needs to correct me on some of the things I've mentioned or
missed, feel free to comment or add to it. I would also like to get your take on it.
The documentary was put together by the Far Sight Institute who according to the Director, Courtney Brown, Phd, they use the exact same techniques
used by our military for remote viewing. He goes on to say that he fully trusts the two remote viewers in this documentary because many of the thing
they have viewed in the past have proven to be very accurate.
I don't know much about Remote Viewing, but I do know they don't know what they're viewing before hand. The documentary uses two separate viewers
viewing it at two separate times to help back-up and give some credibility to the accuracy and common visuals each viewer was seeing.
Basically, as far as the Pentagon was concerned, they viewed it not as a plane that flew into the building but a missile or cruise missile that was
directly under control by 3 or 4 military men in uniform. What I found puzzling was the viewer stated they were dark and had facial hair (middle
eastern men or just U.S. military?). It seemed like it was fired from a military ship. They went on to say it was highly controlled and secret and
the men formed like a brotherhood or elite squad. They saw the impact and commotion and emotions involved by the people inside the Pentagon.
As far as the towers were concerned, the viewers saw 3 different groups of highly secret military personnel/business related people who planned and
controlled the plane that flew into the towers. He describes seeing one group sitting on an AWAC's plane in front of monitors strapped to their seat.
It seemed like they were insinuating the military used unknowing terrorists to carry out the planned terroristic attack used to cover-up secrets and
using it as a stepping stone for something that would be planned later.
The viewers saw a small group of military personnel placing clay like explosives around the building supports inside the towers. They said one guy
was the main leader and a top advisor to the president. The viewer drew a picture of this guy and said he was in his mid or late 40's and had
piercing eyes. He said this guy had no remorse or feelings about killing innocent people. The viewer also saw a secluded conference room with this
leader and a handful of men sitting around a large high quality conference table planning 9/11. Nobody was allowed to leave the room with their
secret documents except the leader who was managing the meeting. All documents were stored in a safe upon leaving the room. He also mentioned the
room had "white noise" to keep anyuone from secretly recording conversations.
If anyone watched the video, who do you think this leader was? I was thinking Donald Rumsfeld, but they said this guy was in the military and
Rumsfeld was also much older than what the viewer described.
The viewer also describes a scene of a guy standing at a drafting table with blueprints. He starts describing a thin drawered file cabinet that holds
maps and prints. I could relate to this because I taught CAD drafting. What he was describing was a blueprint filing cabinet. He also described the
large analog monitors and said they were forging blue prints.
They go on to say they don't know what happened to the people on the planes and whether foreign governments were also involved. They didn't remotely
view building 7 or the plane that was either shot down or crashed near Pittsburgh, PA.
I don't know much about remote viewing, but I do know they don't know what they're viewing before hand. If this remote viewing is accurate then it
gives additional possibilities that 9/11 was planned by a few very powerful and secret people in our military and possibly a foreign government.
edit on 4-4-2016 by WeRpeons because: (no reason given)