It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RickinVa
a reply to: Indigo5
There are a few cabinet positions that deal with matters so sensitive, that these people can and must classify their own work when necessary.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: RickinVa
a reply to: Indigo5
There are a few cabinet positions that deal with matters so sensitive, that these people can and must classify their own work when necessary.
...OK...so she is the one responsible for classifying material at state...if you run with that and she chose not to classify it..so she did not send classified material..Your argument isn't helped here...
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RickinVa
Ok, how do you know the information in the NYT article was classified TK information?
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RickinVa
Cos Hillary said so? That was part of her excuse. She said she just forwarded a New York Times article.
She said the NYT article contained classified TK information?
originally posted by: RickinVa
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RickinVa
Cos Hillary said so? That was part of her excuse. She said she just forwarded a New York Times article.
She said the NYT article contained classified TK information?
I don't know... did she? Look the crap up if you are so concerned. I really could care less... much much less than you seem to.
The only thing that should matter to you is everything from the Talent Keyhole program remains on the Top Secret network until it is later de-classified. Some how it wound up at the NY Times
Because that was what was going around at the time Mr Prosecutor.... go look it up....its very trivial in the grand schemes of things the way they are now
or do you need this to specifically try to debunk me or whatever so you can claim glory and testify to the world how I don't know what I am talking about?
Hillary used the excuse that it was all a misunderstanding about an email she forwarded that originated with NY Times.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: RickinVa
Because that was what was going around at the time Mr Prosecutor.... go look it up....its very trivial in the grand schemes of things the way they are now
No thanks. You made the claim, now prove it. Unless you can't.
or do you need this to specifically try to debunk me or whatever so you can claim glory and testify to the world how I don't know what I am talking about?
Are you worried?
Hillary used the excuse that it was all a misunderstanding about an email she forwarded that originated with NY Times.
It is not denied that the NYT piece triggered classification. Now you have the burden, or pleasure, of proving the NYT's article contained TK classified information that came from a Top Secret Network.
You made the claim, kindly prove it.
And Clinton said during an NPR interview on Wednesday that “the best we can determine” is that the emails in question contained a forwarded New York Times article mentioning a classified drone program. “How a New York Times public article that goes around the world could be in any way viewed as classified, or the fact that it would be sent to other people off of the New York Times site, I think, is one of the difficulties that people have in understanding what this is about,” Clinton said.