It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Though common in informal communication, alot has never made its way into edited writing, and it’s generally considered a misspelling. In any type of serious writing, the two word spelling, a lot, is the safer choice. Even correctly spelled, however, the imprecise term has a colloquial ring, and it might sound out of place in, say, a school paper or an email to a client.
A lot is like any two-word phrase with the indefinite article (a) followed by a noun (lot). For instance, a cow, a cloud, and a burrito are similarly constructed phrases, but no one would write these acow, acloud, and aburrito. Why a lot is so often compounded into alot is an interesting linguistic mystery. It may have something to do with the existence of the unrelated adjective allot, or it could be because lot in this sense is not common outside this phrase (though the plural, lots, is also common in a nearly identical use).
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: butcherguy
I should too I guess but I don't have much to offer the community .
I thought knowledge was something I could offer.
I'll shut up now.
originally posted by: and14263
a reply to: Sillyolme
May as well use old English if you think like this. Language is always evolving. It's painful and tacky but this is fact. We dislike it as much as Chaucer did. Then Shakespeare.
It's just the natural way for language to go.
I don't like it but I've accepted it.