It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A diplomatic row erupted after a top ranking official said a historic border treaty would be ripped up and binned after Brexit.
Calais regional president Xavier Bertrand said France would renege on the terms of Le Touquet Treaty and refuse to police the frontier of a country outside the EU.
It would see British border checks pushed back across the Channel, raising the spectre of a migrant flood into the UK.
The treaty, signed in 2003, sees cross-Channel checks carried out at French ferry and train terminals. Scrapping it would cause a massive security nightmare with migrants free to cross the Channel from where they could launch attempts to sneak into the UK.
New Zealand is joining a list of other nations imposing direct penalties on airlines that board passengers to international destinations without the proper documents. Starting in July, airlines will face fines between NZ$500 and NZ$5000 (US$410, £257, 312€ to US$4080, £2573, 3125€) depending on the seriousness of the breach. Should airlines be entirely responsible?
New Zealand joins Australia, Canada, the UK and the US in imposing fines on airlines that improperly board international passengers.
I agree wholeheartedly, and add that island nations have a better chance of securing/patrolling it's borders due to geographic reasons. Nations that preserve their borders effectively don't rely on others to do their job.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: Spacespider
A truly independent Britain should take care and protect her own borders anyway, a task of which she is more than capable of carrying out and maintaining - it will require a reevaluation of strengthening offshore infrastructure and coastal patrolling logistics.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: Spacespider
A truly independent Britain should take care and protect her own borders anyway, a task of which she is more than capable of carrying out and maintaining - it will require a reevaluation of strengthening offshore infrastructure and coastal patrolling logistics.
A truly independent Britain should take care and protect her own borders anyway, a task of which she is more than capable of carrying out and maintaining
originally posted by: grainofsand
The ferry and train operators have the ultimate responsibility for who they carry.
I say do it France, it is a toothless threat. Massive financial penalties on the companies for every illegal passenger they carry will sort it out quickly, and as SprocketUK said in a later post, removal of operator license if X number of illegal immigrants continue to be found on ships and trains.
It isn't a problem at all, just an increase of boarding security until the ferry or train leaves port.
Ever got onto a plane without a passport anyone? No of course not, and anyone who thinks such a principle cannot be directly transferred to ferries and trains must lack reasoning skills or is just a scaremongering 'remain' voter.
Oh and just a reminder that the £8 Billion the UK pays (net) to the EU each year can increase employement in the border force providing work for lots of people to screen the passengers, easily.