It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The UK and its people are subject to many laws defined and implemented in Brussels! Ridiculous (in my view)!
originally posted by: moniker
originally posted by: anxiouswens
The referendum in 1975 was to stay part of the European Common Market NOT to give away our sovereignity to unelected beaucrats.
Oh my. Where do I even begin.
1. We are still part of the common market.
2. We have not given away our sovereignty to unelected bureaucrats.
3. The MEPs are democratically elected. The councillors are appointed by the head of state of each member country (so yes those are unelected in the same sense that the PM is unelected to the position as PM, but it is nothin like the unelected Lords).
4. Parliament is still the highest court in the UK. We have not given our sovereignty away regardless of what Denial Farage tells you. Only that they may refer certain matters to the ECJ whenever they feel it is appropriate, but it is at Parliament's discretion.
originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
originally posted by: moniker
originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
One thing is clear. After 9 pages of posts to this thread, only a very small number intend to vote IN so far. And the OUT voters are reporting that there associates, friends etc etc only seem to prefer OUT. Which is indicative of the fact that the so call official / media driven polls / others etc are being misreported! Doesn't surprise me.
It will be interesting to see what the final ATS vote count is in June. SO please keep posting the dirt, issues and points for debate and shame etc.
I will definitely vote OUT of the idea of the UK leaving the EU.
That is your prerogative and this ATS vote welcomes all IN, OUT and yet UNDEC votes and opinions to this thread.
Note at the moment that the IN vote is quite low. But time for it to improve for sure.
originally posted by: anxiouswens
The referendum in 1975 was to stay part of the European Common Market NOT to give away our sovereignity to unelected beaucrats. My mum is 87 amd remembers it well. This was the wording on the pamphlet sent out by Government in the run up to that referendum
originally posted by: moniker
originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
originally posted by: moniker
originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamite
One thing is clear. After 9 pages of posts to this thread, only a very small number intend to vote IN so far. And the OUT voters are reporting that there associates, friends etc etc only seem to prefer OUT. Which is indicative of the fact that the so call official / media driven polls / others etc are being misreported! Doesn't surprise me.
It will be interesting to see what the final ATS vote count is in June. SO please keep posting the dirt, issues and points for debate and shame etc.
I will definitely vote OUT of the idea of the UK leaving the EU.
That is your prerogative and this ATS vote welcomes all IN, OUT and yet UNDEC votes and opinions to this thread.
Note at the moment that the IN vote is quite low. But time for it to improve for sure.
In our out won't matter and won't count.
The real vote will be about LEAVE or REMAIN.
Before voting to REMAIN! Because 5 years from now it will be too late!
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
originally posted by: anxiouswens
The referendum in 1975 was to stay part of the European Common Market NOT to give away our sovereignity to unelected beaucrats. My mum is 87 amd remembers it well. This was the wording on the pamphlet sent out by Government in the run up to that referendum
Still well worth a read, I'd say. Especially the parts in which it clearly states that membership approval is a continuous process, not a once-in-a-lifetime event. Only problem is that you managed to get "in" once - after a lot of French resistance - but can't be so sure you will get in again might your nation NOT do so well on it's own. You also would be well advised to read the parts in which it clearly points out that in a modern world "national sovereignity" is an illusion. Even more so for the Brits, whom today are a service-oriented nation (like mine) and can't do anything without the production force of other nations.
You're a bit like hogs there: you eat from the same through we all eat from. Where Germans and Chinese are busy providing the food for all, all you manage to do is moan about the menu. And then, one day, you decide not to have a say about the menu anyway. But you will still have to eat from the same through - and the Chinese will now have the main say in what you will eat.
Choose wisely - be sure brain is in gear before engaging vote.
originally posted by: anxiouswensI see you are from the Netherlands and appear to view the UK with contempt and you are just one person but your attitude is exactly how the whole of the EU seem to see us, we are OK to cough up the money but that is about it.
As the EU is so wonderful
strange that Holland now seem to want a referendum also.
I hope we leave in June and the money we give to the EU can be spent on our own Country and as we appear to be so irrelevant to the EU I am sure they wont miss our money will they!
originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamiteThe UK and its people are subject to many laws defined and implemented in Brussels! Ridiculous (in my view)!
As a Norwegian minister once put it, “if you want to run Europe, you must be in Europe. If you want to be run by Europe, feel free to join Norway.”
originally posted by: grainofsand
a reply to: ForteanOrg
That quote made me chuckle as well.
Why you think anyone would want a similar crap arrangement such as Norway for the UK though I can't imagine.
I'm voting leave with all the associated challenges of striking a deal as a sovereign nation similar to Canada, New Zealand, Australia and the like.
Please don't be lame and assert that such an option is not possible because you cannot know that. Even the above article makes no such claims, as I do not claim it will be all rainbows and unicorns if we vote leave.
Again, it is uncertain either way, and to assert absolutes into this debate would be dishonest at best.
I was referring to the UK having to be subject to laws agreed in Brussels by other country members. That's ridiculous and means the UK is semi-governed from Brussels! The UK should define and administer its own laws and not be undermined by laws cooked up by Eurocrat nitwits!
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
originally posted by: RP2SticksOfDynamiteThe UK and its people are subject to many laws defined and implemented in Brussels! Ridiculous (in my view)!
The EU Laws are defined in lengthy and well thought-out process, in which all EU nations have a say. Yes, if all have had their say and amendments have been applied - and the Law is passed by the Counsil of the EU - it's binding. That's not "ridiculous", that's democracy.
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
a reply to: Flavian
Good read, thank you
I especially liked this quote:
As a Norwegian minister once put it, “if you want to run Europe, you must be in Europe. If you want to be run by Europe, feel free to join Norway.”
Perhaps the UK should opt to join Norway then
originally posted by: johnrobca
I was swinging both ways until I saw an interview with Cameron on sunday morning ... he swung it for me .... LEAVE LEAVE LEAVE!!! His arguments were so poor and pathetic.